Christ in Islam
   
   
   

««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
In
the Name of Allah, the Merciful, the Compassionate

Christ in Islam

by Ahmed Deedat 

««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
Chapter One : Christian Muslim Responses

««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
Debate on TV

At the end of the debate - "Christianity and Islam" - which
appeared on the SABC-TV program "Cross Questions" on Sunday 5th
June 1983, the Chairman, Mr. Bill Chalmers commented: "I think it
can be said from this discussion that there is, at present, somewhat more
accommodation on the Islamic side for the founder of Christianity than
there is on the Christian side for the founder of Islam. What the significance
of that is, we leave it to you, the viewer, to determine, but I do think
you will agree that it is a good thing that we are talking together."

"Bill" as he is popularly addressed, without any formalities,
on all his programs, by all his panelists, is extremely charming and stupendous
in his humility. He is a picture of what the Holy Quran portrays of a good
Christian:

"...And nearest among them in love to the believers wilt thou find
those who say: 'We are Christians': because among these are men devoted
to learning and men who have renounced the world. And they are not arrogant."
(The Holy Quran 5:82)

Jesus - His Status

Were the Muslims on the panel trying to placate the viewers out policy,
deceit or diplomacy? Nothing of the kind! They were only articulating what
God Almighty had commanded them to say in the Holy Quran. As Muslims, they
had no choice. They had said in so many words: "We Muslims believe,
that Jesus was one of the mightiest messengers of God that he was the Christ,
that he was born miraculously without any male intervention (which many
modern-day Christians do not believe today), that he gave life to the dead
by God's permission and that he healed those born blind and the lepers
by god's permission. In fact, no Muslim is a Muslim if he or she does not
believe in Jesus!"

Pleasant Surprise

Over 90% of the people who witnessed this debate must have been pleasantly,
but skeptically, surprised. They might have not believed their ears. They
must have surmised that the Muslims were playing to the gallery - that
they were trying to curry favor with their fellow Christian countrymen;
that if the Muslims would say a few good words about Jesus, then in reciprocation
the Christians might say a few good words about Muhammed (may the peace
and the blessings of God be upon all His righteous servants, Moses, Jesus,
Muhammed...etc.); that I scratch your back and you scratch my back - which
would be a sham or hypocrisy.

Hate Cultivated

We cannot blame the Christians for their skepticism. They have been
so learned for centuries. They were trained to think the worst of the man
Muhammed, salla Allah u alihi wa sallam, and his religion. How aptly
did Thomas Carlyle say about his Christian brethren over a hundred and
fifty years ago: "The lies which well-meaning zeal has heaped round
this man (Muhammed) are disgraceful to ourselves only." We Muslims
are partly responsible for this. We have not done anything substantial
to remove the cobwebs.

Ocean of Christianity

South Africa is an ocean of Christianity. If Libya boasts the highest
percentage of Muslims on the continent of Africa, then the Republic of
South Africa would also be entitled to boast the highest percentage of
Christians. In this ocean of Christianity the R.S.A. - the Muslims are
barely 2% of the total population. We are a voteless minority - numerically,
we count for nothing; politically, we count for nothing; and economically,
one white man, as Oppenheimer, could buy out the whole lot of us, lock,
stock and barrel.

So if we had feigned to appease, we might be excused. But no! We must
proclaim our Master's Will; we must declare the Truth, whether we liked
it or not. In the words of Jesus: "Seek ye the truth, and the truth
shall set you free" (John 8:32).

««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
Chapter Two : Jesus in the Quran

««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
Christians Unaware

The Christian does not know that the true spirit of charity which the
Muslim displays, always, towards Jesus and his mother Mary spring from
the fountainhead of his faith - the Holy Quran. He does not know that the
Muslim does not take the holy name of Jesus, in his own language, without
saying Eesa, alaihi assalam ("Jesus, peace be upon him")

The Christian does not know that in the Holy Quran Jesus is mentioned
twenty five times. For example:

"We gave Jesus, the son of Mary, clear signs and strengthened him
with the Holy Spirit" (The Holy Quran 2:87)

"O Mary! God giveth thee glad tidings of a Word from Him: his name
will be Christ Jesus, the son of Mary..." (3:45)

"...Christ Jesus the son of Mary was (no more than) an apostle
of god..." (4:171)

"...And in their foot steps we sent Jesus the son of Mary..."
(5:46)

"And Zakariya and John, and Jesus and Elias: all in the ranks of
the righteous." (6:85)

Jesus - His Titles

Though Jesus is mentioned by name in twenty-five places in the Holy
Quran, he is also addressed with respect as: Ibn Maryam, meaning
"The son of Mary"; and as the Maseeh (in Hebrew it is
the Messiah), which is translated as "Christ". He is also
known as Abdullah, "The servant of Allah"; and as Rasul
u Allah, the messenger of Allah.

He is spoken of as "The Word of God", as "The Spirit
of God", as a "Sign of God", and numerous other epithets
of honor spread over fifteen different chapters. The Holy Quran honors
this mighty messenger of God, and the Muslims have not fallen short over
the past fourteen hundred years in doing the same. There is not a single
disparaging remark in the entire Quran to which even the most jaundiced
among the Christians can take exception.

Eesa Latinised to "Jesus"

The Holy Quran refers to Jesus as Eesa, and this name is used
more times than any other title, because this was his "Christian"
name. Actually, his proper name was Eesa (Arabic), or Esau
(Hebrew); classical Yeheshua, which the Christian nations of the
West latinised as Jesus. Neither the "J" nor the second "s"
in the name Jesus is to be found in the original tongue - they are not
found in the Semitic languages.

The word is very simply "E S A U" a very common Jewish name,
used more than sixty times in the very first booklet alone of the Bible,
in the part called "Genesis". There was at least one "Jesus"
sitting on the "bench" at the trial of Jesus before the Sanhedrin.
Josephus the Jewish historian mentions some twenty five Jesus' in his "Book
of Antiquities". The New Testament speaks of "Bar-Jesus"
a magician and a sorcerer, a false prophet (Acts 13:6); and also "Jesus-Justus"
a Christian missionary, a contemporary of Paul (Colossians 4:11). These
are distinct from Jesus the son of Mary. Transforming "Esau"
to (J)esu(s) - Jesus - makes it unique. This unique (?) name has gone out
of currency among the Jews and the Christians from the 2nd century after
Christ. Among the Jews, because it came to be a name of ill - repute, the
name of one who blasphemed in Jewry; and among the Christians because it
came to be the proper name of their God. The Muslim will not hesitate to
name his son Eesa because it is an honored name, the name of a righteous
servant of the Lord.

««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
Chapter Three : Mother And Son 
««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

Mary Honored

The birth of Jesus Christ is described in two places of the Quran -
chapter 3 and chapter 19. Reading from the beginning of his birth, we come
across the story of Mary, and the esteemed position which she occupies
in the House of Islam, before the actual annunciation of the birth of Jesus
is given:

"'Behold'! the angels said: 'O Mary! God hath chosen thee and purified
thee, and chosen thee above the women of all nations" (3:42)

"Chosen thee above the women of all nations." Such an honor
is not to be found given to Mary even in the Christian Bible! The verse
continues:

"O Mary! Worship thy Lord devoutly: prostrate thyself, and bow
down (in prayer) with those who bow down." (3:43)

Divine Revelation

What is the source of this beautiful and sublime recitation which, in
its original Arabic, moves men to ecstasy and tears? verse 44 below explains:

"This is part of the tidings, of the things unseen, which We reveal
unto thee (O Muhammad!) by inspiration: Thou wast not with them when they
cast lots with arrows, as to which of them should be charged with the care
of Mary: nor wast thou with them when they disputed (the point)."
(3:44)

Mary's Birth

The story is that the maternal grandmother of Jesus, Hannah, had hitherto
been barren. She poured out her heart to God: If only God will grant her
a child, she would surely dedicate such a child for the service of God
in the temple.

God granted her prayer and Mary was born. Hannah was disappointed. She
was yearning for a son, but instead she delivered a daughter; and in no
way is the female like the male, for what she had in mind. What was she
to do? She had made a vow to God. She waited for Mary to be big enough
to fend for herself.

When the time came, Hannah took her darling daughter to the temple,
to hand over for temple services. Every priest wanted to be the god-father
of this child. They cast lots with arrows for her - like the tossing of
the coin - head or tail? 
eventually she fell to the lot of Zakariya, but not without a dispute.

The Source of His Message

This was the story. But where did Muhammed, salla Allah u alihi wa
sallam, get this knowledge from? He was an Ummi, Arabic for
"unlettered". He did not low how to read or write. He is made
by God Almighty to answer this very question in the verse above, by saying
that it was all by divine inspiration. "No!", says the
controversialist. "This is Muhammed's own concoction. He copied his
revelations from the Jews and Christians. He plagiarized it. He forged
it."

Knowing full-well, and believing as we do, that the whole Quran is the
veritable Word of God, we will nevertheless agree, for the sake of argument,
with the enemies of Muhammed, salla Allah u alihi wa sallam, for
a moment, that he wrote it. We can now expect some cooperation from the
unbelievers.

Ask him: "Have you any qualms in agreeing that Muhammed was an
Arab?" Only an ignorant will hesitate to agree. In that case there
is no sense in pursuing any discussion. Cut short the talk. Close the book!

With the man of reason, we proceed. "That this Arab, in the first
instance, was addressing other Arabs. He was not talking to Indian Muslims,
Chinese Muslims, or Nigerian Muslims. He was addressing his own people,
the Arabs. Whether they agreed with him or not, he told them in the most
sublime form, words that were seared into the hearts and minds of his listeners
that Mary the mother of Jesus, a Jewess, was chosen above the women
of all nations. Not his own mother, nor his wife nor his daughter, nor
any other Arab woman, but a Jewess! Can one explain this? Because to everyone
his own mother or wife, or daughters would come before other women.

Why would the prophet of Islam honor a woman from his opposition! and
a Jewess at that! belonging to a race which had been looking down upon
his people for three thousand years? Just as they still look down upon
their Arab brethren today."

Sarah and Hagar

The Jews learn, from the Bible, that their father, Abraham, had two
wives Sarah and Hagar. They say that they are the children of Abraham through
Sarah his legitimate wife; that their Arab brethren have descended through
Hagar, a "bondwoman", and that as such, the Arabs are an inferior
breed.

Will anyone please explain the anomaly as to why Muhammed, salla
Allah u alihi wa sallam, if he is the author, chose this Jewess for
such high honor? The answer is simple, he had no choice he had no
right to speak of his own desire. "It is no less than an inspiration
sent down to him." (53:4)

The Chapter of Maryam

There is a Chapter in the Holy Quran, named Surat u Maryam "Chapter
Mary", named in honor of Mary the mother of Jesus Christ, peace and
blessings of Allah be upon him; again, such an honor is not to be found
given to Mary in the Christian Bible. Out of the 66 books of the Protestants
and 73 of the Roman Catholics, not one is named after Mary or her son.
You will find books named after Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Peter, Paul
and two score more obscure names, but not a single one is that of Mary!

If Muhammed, salla Allah u alihi wa sallam, was the author of
the Holy Quran, then he would not have failed to include in it with Mary,
the mother of Jesus, his own mother Aamina, his dear wife Khadija, or his
beloved daughter Fatima. But No! No! This can never be. The Quran is not
his handiwork!.

««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
Chapter Four : The Good News 
««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

" 'Behold!' the angels said: 'O Mary! Allah giveth thee glad tidings
of a word from him: his name will be Jesus, the son of Mary; held in honor
in this world and the hereafter; and (of the company of) those nearest
to Allah." (3:45)

"Nearest to God," not physically nor geographically, but spiritually.
Compare this with "And (Jesus) sat on the right hand of God."
(Mark 16:19). The bulk of Christendom has misunderstood this verse as well
as many others in the Bible. They imagine the Father (God) sitting on a
throne, a glorified chair, and His Son, Jesus, sitting on His right hand
side. Can you conjure up the picture? If you do, you have strayed from
the true knowledge of God. He is no old Father Christmas. He is beyond
the imagination of the mind of man. He exists. He is real, but He is not
like anything we can think of, or imagine.

In eastern languages "right hand" meant a place of honor,
which the Holy Quran more fittingly describes as "In the company of
those nearest to Allah." The above verse confirms that Jesus is the
Christ. and that he is the Word which God bestowed upon Mary. Again, the
Christian reads into these words, a meaning which they do not carry. They
equate the word "Christ" with the idea of a god-incarnate; and
the "Word" of God to be God.

"Christ" Not a Name

The word "Christ" is derived from the Hebrew word Messiah,
Arabic Maseeh. Root word masaha, meaning "to rub",
"to massage", "to anoint". Priests and kings were anointed
when being consecrated to their offices. But in its translated Grecian
form, "Christ" seems unique: befitting Jesus only.

Christians like to translate names into their own language; like Cephas
to "Peter" , Messiah to "Christ". How do they
do that? Very easily. Messiah in Hebrew means "Anointed".
The Greek word for anointed is Christos. Just lop off the 'os' from
Christos, and you are left with "Christ"; a unique
name!

Christos means "Anointed", and anointed means appointed
in its religious connotation. Jesus, peace and blessing be upon him, was
appointed (anointed) at his baptism by John the Baptist, as God's Messenger.
Every prophet of God is so anointed or appointed. The Holy Bible is replete
with the "anointed" ones. In the original Hebrew, he was made
a Messiah. Let us keep to the English translation "anointed."

Not only were prophets and priests and kings anointed (Christos-ed),
but horns, and cherubs and lamp-posts also.

"I am the God of Bethel, where you anointed a pillar ..."
(Genesis 31:13)

"If the priest that is anointed do sin ..." (Leviticus
4:3)

"And Moses... anointed the tabernacle and all things that
was therein..." (Leviticus 8:100)

"..the Lord shall...exalt the horn of his anointed"
(I Samuel 2:10)

"Thus saith the Lord to his anointed to Cyrus..." (Isaiah
45:1)

"Thou art the anointed cherub..." (Ezekiel 28:14)

There are an hundred more such references in the Holy Bible. Every time
you come across the word "anointed" in your Bible, you can take
it that that word would be christos in the Greek translations, and
if you take the same liberty with the word that the Christians have done,
you will have Christ Cherub, Christ Cyrus, Christ Priest and Christ Pillar,
...etc.

Some Titles Exclusive

Although, every prophet of God is an anointed one of God, a Messiah,
the title Maseeh or Messiah, or its translation "Christ"
is exclusively reserved for Jesus, the son of Mary, in both Islam and in
Christianity. This is not unusual in religion. There are certain other
honorific titles which may be applied to more than one prophet, yet being
made exclusive to one by usage: like "Rasulullah", meaning
"Messenger of God", which title is applied to both Moses (19:51)
and Jesus (61:6) in the Holy Quran. Yet "Rasullullah"
has become synonymous only with Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, among Muslims.

Every prophet is indeed a "Friend of God", but its Arabic
equivalent "Khalillullah" is exclusively associated with
Father Abraham. This does not mean that the others are not God's friends.
"Kaleemullah", meaning "One who spoke with Allah"
is never used for anyone other than Moses, yet we believe that God spoke
with many of His messengers, including Jesus and Muhammed, may the peace
and blessings of God be upon all His servants. Associating certain titles
with certain personages only, does not make them exclusive or unique in
any way. We honor all in varying terms.

Whilst the good news was being announced (verse 45 above) Mary was told
that her unborn child will be called Jesus, that he would be the Christ,
a "Word" from God, and that...

"He shall speak to the people in childhood and in maturity. And
he shall be (of the company) of the righteous." (3:46)

"At length she brought the (babe) to her people carrying him. They
said: 'O Mary! truly a strange thing has thou brought!'. 'O sister of Aaron!,
thy father was not a man of evil, nor thy mother a woman unchaste!' "
(The Holy Quran 19:27-28)

Jews Amazed

There is no Joseph the carpenter here. The circumstances being peculiar,
Mary the mother of Jesus had retired herself to some remote place in the
East (19:16). After the birth of the child she returns.

A. Yusuf Ali, comments in his popular English translation of the Quran:

"The amazement of the people knew no bounds. In any case they were
prepared to think the worst of her, as she had disappeared from her kin
for some time. But now she comes, shamelessly parading a babe in her arms!
How she had disgraced house of Aaron, the fountain of priesthood!

"Sister of Aaron": Mary is reminded of her high lineage and
the unexceptionable morals of her father and mother. How, they said, she
had fallen, and disgraced the name of her progenitors!

What could Mary do? How could she explain? Would they, in their censorious
mood accept her explanation? All she could do was to point to the child,
who, she knew, was no ordinary child. And the child came to her rescue.
By a miracle he spoke, defended his mother, and preached to an unbelieving
audience."

Allah azza wa jall says in the Quran:

"But she pointed to the babe. They said: 'How can we talk one who
is a child in the cradle?' He (Jesus) said: 'I am indeed a servant of Allah
(God) : He hath given me revelation and made me a prophet: 'and He hath
made me blessed wheresoever I be, and hath enjoined on me prayer and charity
as long as I live. '(He hath made me) kind to my mother, and not overbearing
or unblest; 'So Peace is on me the day I was born, the day that I die,
and the day that I shall be raised up to life again)'!" (19:29-33)

His First Miracle(s)

Thus Jesus, peace and blessings be upon him, defended his mother from
the grave calumny and innuendoes of her enemies. This is the very first
miracle attributed to Jesus in the Holy Quran that, he spoke as an infant
from his mother's arms. Contrast this with his first miracle in the Christian
Bible which occurred when he was over thirty years of age: 

"And the third day there was a marriage in Cana of Galilee; and
the mother of Jesus was there: And both Jesus was called, and his disciples,
to the marriage. And when they wanted wine, the mother of Jesus saith unto
him, they have no wine. Jesus saith unto her, 'Woman, what have I to do
with thee? mine hour is not yet come.' His mother saith unto the servants,
Whatsoever he saith unto you, do it. And there were set there six water
pots of stone, after the manner of the purifying of the Jews, containing
two or three firkins apiece. Jesus saith unto them, Fill the water pots
with water. And they filled them up to the brim. And he saith unto them,
Draw out now, and bear unto the governor of the feast. And they bare it.
When the ruler of the feast had tasted the water that was made wine, and
knew not whence it was: (but the servants which drew the water knew;) the
governor of the feast called the bridegroom, And saith unto him, Every
man at the beginning doth set forth good wine; and when men have well
drunk, then that which is worse: but thou hast kept the good wine until
now." (John 2:110)

Since this miracle, wine has flowed like water in Christendom. Many
reason that what was good for the Master is good enough for them. Jesus
was no "kill-joy" they say. Didn't he make good potent wine,
that even those "well drunk", those whose senses had been dulled
could make out the difference ? "That the best was kept for the last.".
This was no pure grape juice. It was the same wine that, according
to the Christian Bible, enabled the daughters of Lot to seduce their father
(Genesis 19:32-33).It was the same wine which the Christian is advised
to eschew in Ephesians 5:18 - "And be not drunk with wine..."

It is that innocent (?) 1% potency that eventually leads millions down
into the gutter. America has 10 million drunkards in the midst of 70 million
"born-again" Christians! The Americans call their drunkards
"Problem Drinkers". In South Africa, they are called "Alcoholics";
drunkard is too strong a word for people to stomach.

But the Prime Minister of Zambia, Dr. Kenneth Kaunda, does not hesitate
to call a spade a spade. He says, "I am not prepared to lead nation
of drunkards", referring to his own people who drink intoxicants.

Whether the water "blushed" or not "seeing" Jesus,
we cannot blame him or his disciples for the drinking habits of his contemporaries.
For he had truly opined, "have yet many things to say unto you, but
ye cannot bear them now" (John 16:12). Mankind had not reached the
stage of receiving the whole Truth of Islam. Did he not also say "You
cannot put new wine into old bottles"? (Matthew 9:17).

"Mother" or "Woman"?

According to St. John, in the fourth verse above, describing the marriage
feast at Cana, we are told that Jesus, peace and blessings be upon him,
behaved insolently towards his mother. He calls her "woman,"
and to rub more salt into the wound he is made to say "what have I
to do with thee?" What connection is there between you and me, or
what have I got to do with you? Could he have forgotten that this very
"woman" had carried him for nine months, and perhaps suckled
him for 2 years, and had borne endless insults and injuries on account
of him? Is she not his mother? Is there no word in his language for "mother"?

Strange as it may seem, that while the missionaries boast about their
master's humility, meekness and long-suffering, they call him the "Prince
of Peace" and they sing that "he was led to the slaughter like
a lamb, and like a sheep who before his shearer is dumb, he opened not
his mouth", yet they proudly record in the same breath, that he was
ever ready with invectives for the elders of his race, and was always itching
for a showdown i.e. if their records are true:

"Ye hypocrites!"

"Ye wicked and adulterous generation!"

"Ye whited sephulcres!"

"Ye generation of vipers!"

and now to his mother: "Woman..."

Jesus Defended

Muhammed, salla Allah u alihi wa sallam, the Messenger of God,
is made to absolve Jesus from the false charges and calumnies of his enemies.

"And He (God Almighty) hath made me (Jesus) kind to my mother,
and not overbearing or unblest" (19:31).

On receiving the good news of the birth of a righteous son Mary responds:

"She said: 'O My Lord! how shall I have a son, when no man hath
touched me?"

The angel says in reply:

"He said: 'Even so: Allah (God) createth what He willeth: when
He hath decreed a matter He but sayth o it 'Be,' and it is! And Allah (God)
will teach him the Book and Wisdom, the Torah (Law) and the Gospel,"
(3:47-48).

««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
Chapter Five : Quranic and Biblical Versions

««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
Meeting the Reverend

I was visiting the "Bible House" in Johannesburg. Whilst browsing
through the stacks of Bibles and religious books, I picked up an Indonesian
Bible and had just taken in hand a Greek - English New Testament, a large,
expensive volume. I had not realized that I was being observed by the supervisor
of the Bible House. Casually, he walked up to me. Perhaps my beard and
my Muslim headgear were an attraction and a challenge? He inquired about
my interest in that costly volume. I explained that as a student of comparative
religion, I had need for such a book. He invited me to have tea with him
in his office. It was very kind of him and I accepted.

Over the cup of tea, I explained to him the Muslim belief in Jesus,
peace and blessings of Allah be upon him. I explained to him the high position
that Jesus occupied in the House of Islam. He seemed skeptical about what
I said. I was amazed at his seeming ignorance, because only retired Reverend
gentlemen can become Supervisors of Bible Houses in South Africa. I began
reciting from verse 42 of chapters 3 of the Holy Quran:

"'Behold!' The angels said: 'O Mary, Allah hath chosen thee...'"

I wanted the Reverend to listen, not only to the meaning of the Quran,
but also to the music of its cadences when the original Arabic was recited.
Rev. Dunkers (for that was his name) sat back and listened with rapt attention
to "Allah's Words".

When I reached the end of verse 49, the Reverend commented that the
Quranic message was like that of his own Bible. He said, he saw no difference
between what he behaved as a Christian, and what I had read to him. I said:
"that was true". If he had come across these verses in the English
language alone without their Arabic equivalent, side by side, he would
not have been able to guess in a hundred years that he was reading the
Holy Quran. If he were a Protestant, he would have thought that he was
reading the Roman Catholic Version, if he had not seen one, or the Jehovah's
Witness Version or the Greek Orthodox Version, or the hundred and one other
versions that he might not have seen; but he would never have guessed that
he was reading the Quranic version.

The Christian would be reading here, in the Quran, everything he wanted
to hear about Jesus, but in a most noble, elevated and sublime language.
He could not help being moved by it.

In these eight terse verses from 42 to 49 we are told:

(a) That Mary, the mother of Jesus, was a virtuous woman, and honored
above the women of all nations. 
(b) That all that was being said was God's own Revelation to mankind.

(c) That Jesus was the "Word" of God. 
(d) That he was the Christ that the Jews were waiting for. 
(e) That God will empower this Jesus to perform miracles even in infancy.

(f) That Jesus was born miraculously, without any male intervention.

(g) That God will vouchsafe him Revelation. 
(h) That he will give life to the dead by God's permission, and that
he will heal those born blind and the lepers by God's permission, ... etc.

"Chalk and Cheese"

The most fervent Christian cannot take exception to a single statement
or word here. But the difference between the Biblical and the Quranic narratives
is that between "chalk and cheese". "To me they are identical,
what is the difference?" the Reverend asked. I know that in their
essentials both the stories agree in their details, but when we scrutinize
them closely we will discover that the difference between them is staggering.

Now compare the miraculous conception as announced in verse 47 of the
Holy Quran with what the Holy Bible says:

"Now the birth of Jesus Christ was in this wise: When as his mother
Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, (as husband
and wife) she was found with child of the holy ghost."(Matthew
1:18)

Master Dramatizer

The eminent Billy Graham from the United States of America dramatized
this verse in front of 40,000 people in King Park, Durban, with his index
finger sticking out and swinging his outstretched arm from right to left,
he said: "And the Holy Ghost came and impregnated Mary!" On the
other hand St. Luke tells us the very same thing but less crudely. He says,
that when the annunciation was made, Mary was perturbed. Her natural reaction
was :

"How shall this be, seeing I know not a man?" (Luke 1:34)
meaning sexually.

The Quranic narrative is:

"She said: O my Lord! how shall I have a son when no man hath touched
me?" (3:47) meaning sexually.

In essence there is no difference between these two statements "seeing
I know not a man" and "when no man hath touched me". Both
the quotations have an identical meaning. It is simply a choice of different
words meaning the same thing. But the respective replies to Mary's plea
in the two Books (the Quran and the Bible) are revealing.

The Biblical Version

Says the Bible:

"And the angle answered and said into her : 'The Holy Ghost shall
come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow
thee" (Luke 1:35)

Can't you see that you are giving the atheist, the skeptic, the agnostic
a stick to beat you with? They may well ask "How did the Holy Ghost
come upon Mary?" "How did the Highest overshadow her?" We
know that literally it does not mean that: that it was an immaculate conception,
but the language used here, is distasteful. Now contrast this with the
language of the Quran:

The Quranic Version

"He said (the angel says in reply): 'Even so: Allah (God) createth
what He willeth: when He hath decreed a plan, He but saith to it, 'Be,'
and it is!' " (3:47)

This is the Muslim concept of the birth of Jesus. For God to create
a Jesus, without a human father, He merely has to will it. If He wants
to create a million Jesus' without fathers or mothers, He merely wills
them into existence. He does not have to take seeds and transfer them,
like men or animals by contact or artificial insemination . He wills everything
into being by His word of command "Be" and "It is".

There is nothing new in what I am telling you, I reminded the Reverend.
It is in the very first Book of your Holy Bible, Genesis 1:3 "And
God said..." What did He say? He said "Be" and "It
was". He did not have to articulate the words. This is our way of
understanding the word "Be", that He willed everything into being.

Choice for His Daughter

"Between these two versions of the birth of Jesus, the Quranic
version and the Biblical version, which would you prefer to give your daughter
?" I asked the supervisor of the Bible House. He bowed his head down
in humility and admitted "The Quranic Version."

How can "a forgery" or "an imitation", as it is
alleged of the Quran, be better than the genuine, the original, as it is
claimed for the Bible? It can never be, unless this Revelation to Muhammed
is what it, itself, claims to be viz. The pure and holy Word of God! There
are a hundred different tests that the unprejudiced seeker after truth
can apply to the Holy Quran and it will qualify with flying colors to being
a Message from on High.

Like Adam

Does the miraculous birth of Jesus make him a God or a "begotten"
son of God? No! says the Holy Quran:

"The similitude of Jesus before Allah (God) is that of Adam; He
created him from dust then said to him: 'Be', and he was." (3:59)

Yusuf Ali, comments in his notes in the Quran translation:

"After a description of the high position which Jesus occupies
as a prophet in the preceding verses we have a repudiation of the dogma
that he was God, or the son of God, or any thing more than man. If it is
said that he was born without a human father, Adam was also so born. Indeed
Adam was born without either a human father or mother. As far as our physical
bodies are concerned they are mere dust.

In God's sight Jesus was as dust just as Adam was or humanity is. The
greatness of Jesus arose from the divine command 'Be': for after that he
was more than dust a great spiritual leader and teacher"

The logic of it is that, if being born without a male parent entitles
Jesus to being equated with God, then, Adam would have a greater right
to such honor, and this no Christian would readily concede. Thus, the Muslim
is made to repudiate the Christian blasphemy.

Further, if the Christian splits hairs by arguing that Adam was "created"
from the dust of the ground, whereas Jesus was immaculately "begotten"
in the womb of Mary, then let us remind him that, even according to his
own false standards, there is yet another person greater than Jesus, in
his own Bible . Who is this superman?

Paul's Innovation

"For this Melchisedec, king of Salem, priest of the most high God...
Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning
of days, nor end of life..." (Hebrews 7:1,3)

Here is a candidate for Divinity itself, for only God Almighty could
possess these qualities. Adam had a beginning (in the garden), Jesus had
a beginning (in the stable); Adam had an end and, claim the Christians,
so had Jesus "and he gave up the ghost". But where is Melchisedec?
Perhaps he is hibernating somewhere like Rip Van Winkel (a fairy tale character
who slept for many ages.)

And what is this "Hebrews"? It is the name of one of the Books
of the Holy Bible, authored by the gallant St. Paul, the self appointed
thirteenth apostle of Christ. Jesus had twelve apostles, but one of them
(Judas) had the Devil in him. So the vacancy had to be filled, because
of the "twelve" thrones in heaven which had to be occupied by
his disciples to judge the children of Israel (Luke 22:30).

Saul was a renegade Jew, and the Christians changed his name to "Paul",
probably because "Saul" sounds Jewish. This St. Paul made such
a fine mess of the teachings of Jesus, peace blessings be upon him, that
he earned for himself the second most coveted position of "The Most
Influential Men of History" in the monumental work of Michael H. Hart:
The 100 or The Top Hundred or the Greatest Hundred in
History. Paul outclasses even Jesus because, according to Michael Hart,
Paul was the real founder of present day Christianity. The honor
of creating Christianity had to be shared between Paul and Jesus, and Paul
won because he wrote more Books of the Bible than any other single author,
whereas Jesus did not write a single word.

Paul needed no inspiration to write his hyperboles here and in the rest
of his Epistles. Did not Hitler's Minister of Propaganda Goebbels say:
"The bigger the lie the more likely it is to be believed'? But the
amazing thing about this exaggeration is that no Christian seems to have
read it. Every learned man to whom I have shown this verse to, seemed to
be seeing it for the first time. They appear dumbfounded, as described
by the fitting words of Jesus:

"...seeing they see not, and hearing they hear not, neither do
they understand." (Matthew 13:13)

The Holy Quran also contains a verse which fittingly describes this
well cultivated sickness:

"Deaf, dumb and blind, will they not return (to the path)."
(2:18)

The Sons of God

The Muslim takes strong exception to the Christian dogma that "Jesus
is the only begotten son, begotten not made". This is what the Christian
is made to repeat from childhood in his catechism. I have asked learned
Christians, again and again as to what they are really trying to emphasize,
when they say: "Begotten not made".

They know that according to their own God given (?) records, God has
sons by the tons:

"...Adam, which was the son of God."(Luke 3:38)

"That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they
were fair... And when the sons of God came in unto the daughters
of men, and they bare children to them..." (Genesis 6: 2,4)

"...Israel is My son, even My firstborn:" (Exodus 4:22)

"...for I (God) am a Father to Israel, and Ephraim is My
firstborn." (Jeremiah 31:9)

"...the Lord hath said unto me (David): 'Thou art My son:
this day have I begotten thee." (Psalms 2:7)

"For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons
of God." (Romans 18:14)

Can't you see that in the language of the Jew, every righteous person,
every Tom, Dick and Harry who followed the Will and Plan of God, was a
"Son of God". It was a metaphorical descriptive term commonly
used among the Jews. The Christian agrees with this reasoning, but goes
on to say: "but Jesus was not like that". Adam was made
by God. Every living thing was made by God, He is the Lord, Cherisher and
Sustainer of all. Metaphorically speaking therefore God is the Father of
all. But Jesus was the "begotten" son of God, not a created
son of God ?

Begotten Means "Sired"!

In my forty years of practical experience in talking to learned Christians,
not a single one has opened his mouth to hazard an explanation of the phrase
"begotten not made". It had to be an American who dared
to explain. He said : "It means, sired by God." "What!?"
I exploded : "Sired by God?" "No, no!" he said,
"I am only trying to explain the meaning, I do not believe that God
really sired a son."

The sensible Christian says that the words do not literally mean what
they say. Then why do you say it? Why are you creating unnecessary conflict
between the 1,200,000,000 Christians and a thousand million Muslims of
the world in making senseless statements?

Reason for Objection

The Muslim takes exception to the word "begotten", because
begetting is an animal act, belonging to the lower animal functions of
sex. How can we attribute such a lowly capacity to God? Metaphorically
we are all the children of God, the good and the bad, and Jesus would be
closer to being the son of God than any one of us, because he would be
more faithful to God then any one of us can ever be. From that point of
view he is preeminently the son of God.

Although this pernicious word "begotten" has now unceremoniously
been thrown out of the "Most Accurate" version of the Bible,
the Revised Standard Version (R.S.V.), its ghost still lingers on
in the Christian mind, both black and white. Through its insidious brainwashing
the white man is made to feel superior to his black Christian brother of
the same Church and Denomination. And in turn, the black man is given a
permanent inferiority complex through this dogma.

Brain-washed Inferiority

The human mind can't help reasoning that since the "begotten son"
of an African will look like an African, and that of a Chinaman as a Chinese,
and that of an Indian like an Indian: so the begotten son of God
aught naturally to look like God. Billions of beautiful pictures and replicas
of this "only begotten son of God" are put in peoples hands.
He looks like a European with blonde hair, blue eyes and handsome features
like e one I saw in the "King of Kings" or "The Day of Triumph"
or "Jesus of Nazareth". Remember Jeffrey Hunter? The "Savior"
of the Christian is more like a German than a Jew with his polly nose.
So naturally, if the son is a white man, the father would also be a white
man (God?). Hence the darker skinned races of the earth subconsciously
have the feeling of inferiory ingrained in their souls as God's "step
children". No amount of face creams, skin lighteners and hair straighteners
will erase the inferiority.

God is neither black nor white. He is beyond the imagination of the
mind of man. Break the mental shackles of a Caucasian (white) man-god,
and you have broken the shackles of a permanent inferiority. But intellectual
bondages are harder to shatter: the slave himself fights to retain them.

««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
Chapter Six : Answer to Christian Dilemmas

««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
"Christ in Islam" is really Christ in the Quran: and the Holy
Quran has something definite to say about every aberration of Christianity.
The Quran absolves Jesus, peace and blessings be upon him, from all the
false charges of his enemies as well as the misplaced infatuation of his
followers. His enemies allege that he blasphemed against God by claiming
Divinity. His misguided followers claim that he did avow Divinity, but
that was not blasphemy because he was God. What does the Quran say ?

Addressing both the Jews and the Christians, Allah says:

"O People of the Book! commit no excesses in your religion: nor
say of Allah (God) aught but the truth. Christ Jesus son of Mary was (no
more than) a messenger of Allah (God), and His Word, which he bestowed
on Mary, and a Spirit proceeding from Him: so believe in Allah (God) and
His messengers..." (4:171)

Going to Extremes

"O People of the Book" is a very respectful title with which
the Jews and the Christians are addressed in the Holy Quran. In other words,
Allah is saying "O Learned People!", "O People with a Scripture!"
According to their own boast, the Jews and the Christians prided themselves
over the Arabs, who had no Scripture before the Quran. As a learned people,
Allah pulls up both the contending religionists for going to either extremes
as regards the personality of Christ.

The Jews made certain insinuations about the legitimacy of Jesus and
charged him of blasphemy by twisting his words. The Christians read other
meanings into his words; wrench words out of their context to make him
God.

The modern day Christian, the hot - gospeller, the Bible thumper, uses
harsher words and cruder approaches to win over a convert to his blasphemies.

He says:

(a) "Either Jesus is God or a liar" 
(b) "Either Jesus is God or a lunatic" 
(c) "Either Jesus is God or an impostor"

These are his words, words culled from Christian literature. Since no
man of charity, Muslim or otherwise, can condemn Christ so harshly as the
Christian challenges him to do, perforce he must keep non-committal. He
thinks he must make a choice between one or the other of these silly extremes.
It does not occur to him that there is an alternative to this Christian
conundrum.

Sensible Alternative

Is it not possible that Jesus is simply what he claimed to be, a prophet,
like so many other prophets that passed away before him? Even that he is
one of the greatest of them, a mighty miracle worker, a great spiritual
teacher and guide - the Messiah!. Why only God or Lunatic? Is "lunacy"
the opposite of "Divinity" in Christianity? What is the antonym
of God? Will some clever Christian answer?

The Quran lays bare the true position of Christ in a single verse, followed
by a note by Yusuf Ali's:

  »  "That he was the son of a woman, Mary, and therefore a man;"

  »  "But a messenger, a man with a mission from Allah (God), and therefore
entitled to honor." 

  »  "A Word bestowed on Mary, for he was created by Allah's word 'Be',
and he was;"(3:59). 

  »  A spirit proceeding from Allah (God), but not Allah: his life and mission
were more limited than in the case of some other messengers, though we
must pay equal honor to him as a prophet of Allah. The doctrines of Trinity,
equality with God, and sons, are repudiated as blasphemies. Allah (God)
is independent of all needs and has no need of a son to manage His affairs.
The Gospel of John (whoever wrote it) has put a great deal of Alexandrian
Gnostic mysticism round the doctrine of the Word (Greek, Logos), but it
is simply explained here." 

Jesus Questioned

Reproduced below are verses 119 to 121 from the Chapter of Maeda (chapter
5 of the Quran) depicting the scene of Judgment Day, when Allah will question
Jesus, peace and blessings be upon him, regarding the misdirected zeal
of his supposed followers in worshipping him and his mother: and his response,

"And behold! Allah will say: 'O Jesus the son of Mary! Didst
thou say unto men, take me and my mother for two gods beside Allah?' He
will say: 'Glory to Thee! never could I say what I had no right (to say).
Had I said such a thing, Thou wouldst indeed have known it. Thou knowest
what is in my heart, Thou I know not what is in Thine. For Thou knowest
in full all that is hidden.

'Never said I to them aught except what Thou didst command me to
say, to wit, 'Worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord'; and I was a witness
over them whilst I dwelt amongst them; when Thou didst take me up Thou
wast the Watcher over them, and Thou art a witness to all things.

'If Thou dost punish them, they are Thy servant: If Thou dost forgive
them, Thou art the Exalted in power, the Wise.'" 
(5:116-118)

Claimed No Divinity

If this is the statement of truth from the All-Knowing, that "Never
said I to them aught except what Thou didst command me to say, to wit,
'Worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord'", then how do the Christians
justify worshipping Jesus?

There is not a single unequivocal statement throughout the Bible, in
all its 66 volumes of the Protestant versions, or in the 73 volumes of
the Roman Catholic versions, where Jesus claims to be God or where he says
"worship me". Nowhere does he say that he and God Almighty "are
one" and "the same person."

The last phrase above "one and the same person" tickles many
a "hot-gospeller" and "Bible-thumper," not excluding
the Doctor of Divinity and the Professor of Theology. Even the new converts
to Christianity have memorized these verses. They are programmed to rattle
off verses out of context, upon which they can hang their faith. The words
"are one" activates the mind by association of memories. "Yes",
say the Trinitarians, the worshippers of three gods in one God, and one
God in three gods, "Jesus did claim to be God!" Where?

Reverend at the Table

I had taken Rev. Morris D.D. and his wife, to lunch at the "Golden
Peacock." While at the table, during the course of our mutual sharing
of knowledge, the opportunity arose to ask, "Where?" And without
a murmur he quoted, "I and my father are one" to imply
that God and Jesus were one and the same person. That Jesus here claims
to be God. The verse quoted was well known to me, but it was being quoted
out of context. It did not carry the meaning that the Doctor was
imagining, so I asked him, "What is the context?"

Choked on "Context"

The Reverend stopped eating and began staring at me. I said, "Why?
Don't you know the context?", "You see, what you have quoted
is the text, I want to know the context, the text that goes with it, before
or after." Here was an Englishman (Canadian), a paid servant of the
Presbyterian Church, a Doctor of Divinity, and it appeared that I was trying
to teach him English. Of course he knew what "context" meant.
But like the rest of his compatriots, he had not studied the sense in which
Jesus had uttered the words.

In my forty years of experience, this text had been thrown at me hundreds
of times, but not a single learned Christian had ever attempted to hazard
a guess as to its real meaning. They always start fumbling for their Bibles.
The Doctor did not have one with him. When they do start going for their
Bibles, I stop them in their stride: "Surely, you know what you are
quoting?", "Surely, you know your Bible?" After reading
this, I hope some "born-again" Christians will rectify this deficiency.
But I doubt that my Muslim readers will ever come across one in their lifetime
who could give them the context.

What is the Context?

It is unfair on the part of the Reverend, having failed to provide the
context, then to ask me, "Do you know the context?" "Of
course," I said. "Then, what is it?" asked my learned friend.
I said, "That which you have quoted is the text of John chapter 10,
verse 30. To get at the context, we have to begin from verse 23 which reads:

23. "and Jesus was in the temple area walking in Solomon's
Colonnade." (John 10:23). 

John, or whoever he was, who wrote this story, does not tell us the
reason for Jesus tempting the Devil by walking alone in the lion's den.
For we do not expect the Jews to miss a golden opportunity to get even
with Jesus. Perhaps, he was emboldened by the manner in which he had literally
whipped the Jews single-handed in the Temple, and upset the tables of the
money changers at the beginning of his ministry (John 2:15).

24. "The Jews gathered around him, saying, "How long
will you keep us in suspense? If you are the Christ, tell us plainly."
(John 10:24). 

They surrounded him. Brandishing their fingers in his face, they began
accusing him and provoking him; saying that he had not put forth his claim
plainly enough, clearly enough. That he was talking ambiguously. They were
trying to work themselves into a frenzy to assault him. In fact, their
real complaint was that they did not like his method of preaching, his
invectives, the manner in which he condemned them for their formalism,
their ceremonialism, their going for the letter of the law and forgetting
the spirit. But Jesus could not afford to provoke them any further there
were too many and they were itching for a fight.

Discretion is the better part of valor. In a conciliatory spirit, befitting
the occasion:

25. "Jesus answered, I did tell you, but you do not believe.
The miracles I do in my Father's name speak for me," 

26. "but you do not believe because you are not my sheep."
(John 10:25-26). 

Jesus rebuts the false charge of his enemies that he was ambiguous in
his claims to being the Messiah that they were waiting for. He says that
he did tell them clearly enough, yet they would not listen to him, but:

27. "My sheep listen to my voice; I know them, and they
follow me." 

28. "I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish;
no one can snatch them out of my hand." 

29. "My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than
all; no one can snatch them out of my Father's hand.." (John
10:29). 

How can anyone be so blind as not to see the exactness of the ending
of the last two verses. But spiritual blinkers are more impervious than
physical defects. He is telling the Jews and recording for posterity, the
real unity or relationship between the Father and the son. The most crucial
verse:

30. "I and the Father are one." (John 10:30).

One in what? In their Omniscience? In their Nature? In their Omnipotence?
No! One in purpose! That once a believer has accepted faith, the Messenger
sees to it that he remains in faith, and God Almighty also sees to it that
he remains in faith. This is the purpose of the "Father" and
the "son" and the "Holy Ghost" and of
every man and every woman of faith. Let the same John explain his
Gnostic mystic verbiage.

"That they all may be one as thou. Father, art in me, and
I in thee, that they also may be one in us..."

"I in them, and thou in me, that they may be made perfect in one..."(John
17:20-22)

If Jesus is "one" with God, and if that "oneness"
makes him God, then the traitor Judas, and the doubting Thomas, and the
satanic Peter, plus the other nine who deserted him when he was most in
need are God(s), because the same "oneness" which he claimed
with God in John 10:30, now he claims for all "who forsook
him and fled" (Mark 14:50). All "ye of little faith"
(Matthew 8:26). All "O faithless and perverse generation"
(Luke 9:41). Where and when will the Christian blasphemy end? The expression
"I and my Father are one," was very innocent, meaning nothing
more than a common purpose with God. But the Jews were looking for trouble
and any excuse will not do, therefore,

31. "Again the Jews picked up stones to stone him,"

32. "but Jesus said to them, I have shown you many great
miracles from the Father. For which of these do you stone me?" 

33. "The Jews answered him, saying : 'For a good work we
stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man,
makest thyself a God.'" (John 10:31-33). 

In verse 24 above the Jews falsely alleged that Jesus was talking ambiguously.
When that charge was ably refuted, they then accused him of blasphemy which
is like treason in the spiritual realm. So they say that Jesus is claiming
to be God "I and the Father are one". The Christians agree with
the Jews in this that Jesus did make such a claim; but differ in that it
was not blasphemy because the Christians say that he was God and was entitled
to own up to his Divinity.

The Christians and the Jews are both agreed that the utterance is serious.
To one as an excuse for good "redemption", and to the other as
an excuse for good "riddance". Between the two, let the poor
Jesus die. But Jesus refuses to co-operate in this game, so:

34. "Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your Law,
`I have said you are gods'?" 

35. "If he called them `gods,' to whom the word of God
came --and the Scripture cannot be broken--," 

36. "what about the one whom the Father set apart as his
very own and sent into the world? Why then do you accuse me of blasphemy
because I said, `I am God's Son'?" (John 10:34-36). 

Why "Your Law"?

He is a bit sarcastic in verse 34, but in any event, why does he say:
"Your Law"? Is it not also his Law? Didn't he say: "Think
not that I am come to destroy the Law of the prophets: I am come
not to destroy, but to fulfill (the Law). For verily I say unto you, till
heaven and earth pass away, one Jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass
from the Law, till all be fulfilled." (Matthew 5:1718).

"You are Gods"

"You are gods:" He is obviously quoting from the 82nd Psalm
, verse 6, "I have said, ye are gods: and all of you are the
children of the most High."

Jesus, continues: "If he (i.e. God Almighty) called them gods,
unto whom the word of God came (meaning that the prophets of God were called
'gods') and the scripture cannot be broken..." (John 10:35), in other
words he is saying: "you can't contradict me!" Jesus knows his
Scripture; he speaks with authority; and he reasons with his enemies that:
"If good men, holy men, prophets of God are being addressed as 'gods'
in our Books of Authority, with which you find no fault, then why do you
take exception to me? When the only claim I make for myself is far inferior
in our language, viz. 'A son of God' as against others being called 'gods'
by God Himself. Even if I (Jesus) described myself as 'god' in our language,
according to Hebrew usage, you could find no fault with me." This
is the plain reading of Christian Scripture. I am giving no interpretations
of my own or some esoteric meaning to words!

««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
Chapter Seven : "In The Beginning"

««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
"Where does Jesus say: 'I am God,' or 'I am equal to God,' or 'Worship
me'?" I asked the Rev. Morris again.

He took a deep breath and took another try. He quoted the most oft-repeated
verse of the Christian Bible - John 1:1.

"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and
the Word was God."

Please note, these are not the words of Jesus. They are the words of
John (or whoever wrote them). Acknowledged by every erudite Christian scholar
of the Bible as being the words of another Jew, Philo of Alexandria, who
had written them even before John and Jesus were born. And Philo claimed
no divine inspiration for them. No matter what mystical meaning that Philo
had woven around these words (which our John has plagiarized), we will
accept them for what they are worth.

Greek not Hebrew

Since the manuscripts of the 27 Books of the New Testament are in Greek,
a Christian sect has produced its own version and has even changed the
name of this selection of 27 Books to Christian Greek Scriptures
! I asked the Reverend whether he knew Greek? "Yes," he said,
He had studied Greek for 5 years before qualification. I asked him what
was the Greek word for "God" the first time it occurs in the
quotation "and the Word was With God"? He kept staring, but didn't
answer. So I said, the word was Hotheos, which literally means "The
God".

Since the European (including the North American) has evolved a system
of using capital letters to start a proper noun and small letters for common
nouns, we would accept his giving a capital "G" for God; in other
words Hotheos is rendered "the god" which in turn is rendered
"God".

"Now tell me, what is the Greek word for "God" in the
second occurrence in your quotation - "and the Word was God"?
The Reverend still kept silent. Not that he did not know Greek, or that
he had lied, but he knew more than that; the game was up. I said
: "the word was Tontheos, which means "a god".

According to your own system of translating you aught to have spelt
this word 'God' a second time with a small 'g' i.e. 'god', and not 'God'
with a capital 'G'; in other words Tontheos is rendered "a
god". Both of these, "god" or "a god" are correct.

I told the Reverend: "But in 2 Corinthians 4:4 you have dishonestly
reversed your system by using a small 'g' when spelling 'God' "(and
the devil is) the god of this world." The Greek word for "the
god" is Hotheos the same as in John 1:1. "Why have you
not been consistent in your translations ?" "If Paul was inspired
to write hotheos the God for the Devil, why don't you use
that capital 'G'?"

And in the Old Testament, the Lord said unto Moses: "See, I have
made thee a god to Pharoah" (Exodus 7:1). "Why do you
use a small 'g' for 'God' when referring to Moses instead of a capital
'G' as you do for a mere word 'Word' - "and the Word was God."?

"Why do you do this? Why do you play fast and loose with the Word
of God?" I asked the reverend. He said, "I didn't do it."
I said, "I know, but I am talking about the vested interests of Christianity,
who are hell-bent to deify Christ, by using capital letters here and
small letters there, to deceive the unwary masses who think that every
letter, every comma and full stop and the capital and small letters were
dictated by God (Capital 'G' here!)."

««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
Chapter Eight : What is Left 
««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

Three Topics

It can hardly be expected in a small publication of this nature that
one can deal with all the references about Jesus, peace and blessings be
upon him, interspersed throughout the fifteen different chapters of the
Holy Quran. What we can do is to give a quick glance to the index page
reproduced from the Quran earlier in this letter.

Here we find three significant topics, not dealt with yet in our discussion:

  »  Not crucified, (4:157). 

  »  Message and miracles,(5:113, 19:30-33). 

  »  Prophesied Ahmed, (61:6). 

Regarding the first topic, "not crucified", I had written
a booklet under the heading "Was Christ Crucified?" some twenty
years ago. The book is presently out of print, and further, it needs updating,
for much water has passed under the bridge since it first saw the light
of day.

As regards the third topic mentioned above, "Prophesied Ahmed",
I propose to write a booklet under the title "Muhammed, salla Allah
u alihi wa sallam, the Natural Successor to Christ" after I have
completed "Was Christ Crucified?", I hope to complete both these
projects soon, Insha Allah! (Arabic: "By the will of Allah").

The Way to Salvation

We are now left with Topic No. 2, "Message and miracles".
The message of Jesus was as simple and straight forward as that of all
his predecessors as well as that of his successor Muhammed, salla Allah
u alihi wa sallam, namely "Believe in God and keep His Commandments".
For the God who inspired His Messengers, is an unvarying God and
He is consistent: He is not the "author of confusion" (1 Corinthian14:33).

A law abiding Jew comes to Jesus seeking eternal life or salvation.
In the words of Matthew:

"And behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good
thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?

And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but
one, that is God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments."
(Matthew 19:16-17)

You will agree, that if you or I were that Jew, we would infer from
these words that, according to Jesus, peace and blessings be upon him,
salvation was guaranteed, provided we kept the commandments without the
shedding of any innocent blood. Unless, of course Jesus was speaking with
tongue in cheek; knowing full well that his own "forthcoming redemptive
sacrifice", his "vicarious atonement" (?) for the sins of
mankind, was not many days hence.

Why would Jesus give him the impossible solution of keeping the
Law (as the Christian alleges) when an easier way was in the offing? Or
did he not know what was going to happen, that he was to be crucified ?
Was there not a contract between Father and Son, before the worlds began,
for his redeeming blood to be shed? Had he lost his memory? No! There was
no such fairy tale agreement as far as Jesus was concerned. He knew that
there is only one way to God, and that is, as Jesus said, "keep
the Commandments"!

Miracles, What They Prove

Regarding his miracles: the Holy Quran does not go into any detail about
blind Bartimus or about Lazarus or any other miracle, except that he (Jesus)
defended his mother as an infant in his mother's arms. The Muslim has no
hesitation about accepting the most wondrous of his miracles - even that
of reviving the dead. But that does not make Jesus a "God" or
the begotten "Son of God" as understood by the Christian.

Miracles do not prove even prophethood, or whether a man is true or
false. Jesus himself said: 

"For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall
show great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they
shall deceive the very elect."(Matthew 24:24)

If false prophets and false Christs can perform miraculous feats, then
these wonders or miracles do not prove even the geniuses or otherwise,
of a prophet. 

John the Baptist, according to Jesus, was the greatest of the Israelite
prophets. Greater than Moses, David, Solomon, Isaiah and all, not excluding
himself: in his own words: 

"Verily I say unto you, among them that are born of women there
hath not risen a greater than John the Baptist..." (Matthew 11:11)

  »  Not excluding Jesus: because, was he not born of a woman - Mary? 

  »  The Baptist, greater than "all", yet he performed not a single
miracle! Miracles are no standards of judging truth and falsehood. 

But in his childishness, the might Christian insists that Jesus is God
because he gave life back to the dead. Will reviving the dead make others
God too? This perplexes him, because he has mentally blocked himself from
the miracles of others who outshine Jesus in his own Bible. For example,
according to his false standard: 

  »  Moses is greater than Jesus because he put life back into a dead stick
and transmuted it from the plant kingdom to the animal kingdom by making
it into a serpent (Exodus 7:10). 

  »  Elisha is greater than Jesus because the bones of Elisha brought a
man back to life merely by coming into contact with the corpse (2 Kings
13:21). 

Need I illustrate to you a catalogue of miracles? But the sickness persists
- "it was God working miracles through His prophets but Jesus performed
them of his own power." Where did Jesus get all his power from? Ask
Jesus, and he will tell us:

Power not His Own

"...All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth."
(Matthew 28:18)

"...I cast out devils by the Spirit of God then the kingdom
of God is come unto you." (Matthew 12:28)

"I can of mine own self do nothing " (John 5:30)

"I with the finger of God cast out devils" (Luke 1
1:20)

Borrowed Power

The "power" as he says is not his, "it is given unto
me". Given by whom? By God, of course! Every action, every word he
attributes to God.

Lazarus

But since so much is made of Jesus' mightiest miracle of reviving Lazarus
from the dead, we will analyze the episode as recorded in John's Gospel.
It is astonishing that none of the other Gospel writers mention Lazarus
in any context. However, the story is that Lazarus was very sick, his sisters
Mary and Martha had made frantic calls for Jesus to come and cure his sickness
but he arrived too late, actually four days after his demise.

He Groaned

Mary wails to Jesus that had he arrived in time, perhaps her brother
would not have died; meaning that if he could heal other peoples' sicknesses,
why would he not have healed her brother, a dear friend of his. Jesus says
that "even now if ye have faith, ye shall see the glory of god."
The condition was that they should have faith. Didn't he say that faith
could move mountains?

He asks to be taken to the tomb. On the way, "he groaned in the
spirit". He was not mumbling; he was pouring out his heart and praying
to God. But while he sobbed so bitterly his words were not audible enough
for people around him to understand. Hence the words "he groaned".
On reaching the grave, Jesus "groaned" again; perhaps, even more
earnestly and God heard his groaning (his prayer), and Jesus received the
assurance that God will fulfill his request. Now, Jesus could rest assured
and command that the stone which was barring the tomb, be removed so that
Lazarus could come back from the dead. Without that assurance from God,
Jesus would have made a fool of himself.

Avoiding Misunderstanding

Mary thinks of the stink because her brother had been dead for four
days! But Jesus was confident and the stone was removed. Then he looked
up towards heaven and said:

"Father, I thank thee that thou hast heard me. And I knew that
thou hearest me always: but because of the people which stand by I said
it, that they may believe that thou hast sent me." (John 11:41-42)

What is all this, play - acting? Why all the drama? Because he know
that these superstitious and credulous people will misunderstand the source
of the miracle. They might take him for "God". Giving life to
the dead is the prerogative of God alone. To make doubly sure, that his
people do not misunderstand, he speaks out loudly that the "groaning"
was actually his crying to God Almighty for help. The prayer was incoherent
as far as the bystanders could discern, but the Father in heaven had accepted
his prayer, viz. "thou hast heard me".

Furthermore, he says, "thou hearest me always"; in other words,
every miracle wrought by him was an answer by God Almighty to his prayer.
The Jews of his day understood the position well, and they "glorified
God", as Matthew tells us of another occasion when the Jews exclaimed
"for giving such power unto men" (Matt. 9:8).

In fact, Jesus gives his reason for speaking loudly. He says, "that
they may believe that thou has sent me." One who is sent is a messenger,
and if he be sent by God, then he is a Messenger of God i.e. Rasulullah.
Jesus is referred to in the Quran asRasulullah ("Messenger
of Allah").

Alas, this attempt by Jesus to prevent any misunderstanding, as to who
really performed the miracle, and that he was in fact only a messenger
of God, failed. Christians will not even accept the unambiguous disavowal
of Jesus, nor the testimony of Peter, the "Rock" upon which Jesus
was supposed to build his Church. Peter truly testified:

"Ye men of Israel, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, A man
approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God
did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know. "
(Acts 2:22)

Case Not Hopeless

This very same message is repeated by God Almighty in the Holy Quran,
following the annunciation. In verse 49 of chapter 3, Allah makes it clear
that every sign or wonder that Jesus performed was "By Allah's leave,"
by God's permission. Jesus says so, Peter says so and God says so; but
the stubborn controversialist will not listen: prejudice, superstition
and credulity die hard. Our duty is simply to deliver the Message, loud
and clear, the rest we leave to God. The case is not altogether hopeless
for Allah tells us in His Holy Book:

"And among them are some who have faith, but most of them are perverted
transgressors." (3:110)

"Among them", meaning among the Jews and the Christians, there
are two types of people; the one group described as people of faith to
whom this book is addressed, and the other as rebellious transgressors.
We must also find ways and means of getting at them. Our literature is
eminently suited to cater for all. Pass them on to your non - Muslim friends
after reading.

Open the Holy Quran and make your Christian friends and acquaintances
to read the verses discussed in this book. Then we can truly conclude:

"Such (was) Jesus the son of Mary: 
(it is) a statement of truth, about which 
they (vainly) dispute.

"It is not befitting to (the majesty of) Allah 
(God) that He should beget a son. Glory be to Him! 
when He determines a matter, He only says to it, 
'Be', and it is. 

"Verily Allah is my Lord and your Lord: 
Him therefore serve ye: this is a Way that is straight."
(19:34-36)

««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
This is an authorized modification of the original English text. 
For more free publications, please contact:

Islamic Propagation Centre International 
124 Queen Street , Durban, 4001 Republic of South Africa 
Telephone (027-31) 306-0026. Telex (095) 6-21815 IPCI SA 
Telefax (027-31) 304-0326 

««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

**This file was converted from HTML to TEXT using a TRIAL version of**
**Markup Remover 1.1 (C) 1998 by Aquatic Moon Software http://www.aquaticmoon.com/**
**This message does not appear in files converted after the program has been liscensed.**