Search: The Web or BeYoND-THe-iLLuSioN Only 
To: alt.magick.tyagi,alt.magick
From: tyagI@houseofkaos.Abyss.coM (tyagi mordred nagasiva)
Subject: Re: Insane Proposition
Date: Kali Yuga 49941012 
Quoting:  |> others
          |gilliam@rudkin.fccc.edu (Jon Charles Gilliam) 

|>We have such principles.  They are taught (in various guises) by Gurus,
|>Priests, Therapists, 12-step counselors, motivational seminars,
|>diet programs, lecturers on esoteric topics, and kindergarden teachers.  
|>Like Newton's laws of motion, these principles enable us to manipulate 
|>concepts which were here-to-fore to ill-formed to permit productive use.

Sure, but neither Newton's nor Magick's principles are absolute.  They
require a certain context in which to be found true.  Magick's context 
appears to be that which concretizes into personality: time, culture, 
class, etc.


|>Where they differ from Newton's laws is in the difficulty of defining
|>metrics for the problem space and the complexity of the phenomena
|>that are being described.  These result in much vaguer statements with
|>much weaker predictive power.  None-the-less, merely having a taxonomy
|>for discussing the issues is a considerable aid to progress.

I still say that the object of Magick as science isn't 'prediction'.
It is ENJOYMENT or, perhaps, TRANSFORMATION.


|   Here's the rub, I think.  In Science, 'progress' is something that
|groups can come to a consensus about, and can work together to accomplish.

The Church of any religion can bring about a 'consensus'.  All it has to
do is restrict the available resources from those activities which might
lead to a lack of 'progress'.

'Progress' is no more clearly defined within modern Science than it is
in modern Magick.  The difference is that modern Science is simply more
widely accepted, along with its (unproven) axioms and (ultimately 
relative) value scheme.


|   The question is, can groups of magicians come to a consensus about
|what 'progress' is so that they can work together without losing the
|arational, deeper essence behind their rhetoric?  

This is why I say that the standards of 'progress' differ between
Magick and at least modern Science.  Groups of magicians can surely
come to consensus on the value of their rites.  This is what makes
'covens' or 'orders' coalesce: consistent value in combined workings.


|Or does this sort of cabal naturally lead into organized religion?

Of course it does.  Magick which becomes institutionalized IS organized
religion.

tyagi@houseofkaos.abyss.com
tyagi nagasiva

Disclaimer: The file contained in the box above or displayed in a separate window from a link in the box above is NOT owned nor implied to be owned by BeYoND THe iLLuSioN. Most files at BeYoND THe iLLuSioN are originally from public Bulletin Board Systems (BBS) which were popular in the days before the Internet or from gopher, web, and FTP sites from the early days of the Internet which no longer exist today. Essentially, all files were acquired from the public domain in one for or another.

However, there have been occasions when copyright protected material has appeared on BeYoND THe iLLuSIoN without permission of the copyright holder. In these instances, we have and will continue to remove the copyright protected file as soon as it is brought to our attention. This can now be done using our Report Copyright Material form. Fill out the form, and the webmaster will be notified of the situation.

There are also times when files found on BeYoND THe iLLuSioN have a real home somewhere else on the Internet. In these instances, we will gladly replace the file with a link to its true home whenever it is brought to our attention. If you know of the true home of any of these files, you can use our Report Original URL form to bring it yo our attention.