CONCENTRATION CAMP PLANS FOR U.S. CITIZENS 

Transcript of taped message concerning the implementation of a 
dictatorial government in the United States. 

A NATIONAL EMERGENCY: TOTAL TAKEOVER 

This is William R. Pabst. My address is 1434 West Alabama Street, 
Houston, Texas 77006. My telephone number is: (713) 521-9896. This is 
my 1979 updated report on the concentration camp program of the Dept. 
of Defense of the United States. 

On April 20, 1976, after a rapid and thorough investigation, I filed 
suit on behalf of the People of the United States against various 
personages that had a key part in a conspiratorial program to do away 
with the United States as we know it. This is a progress report to 
you, the plaintiffs, you the People of the United States. The civil 
action number is 76-H-667. It is entitled, "Complaint Against the 
Concentration Camp Program of the Dept. of Defense." It was filed in 
the U.S. District Court for the southern district of Texas, Houston 
division. The judge responsible for the case was Judge Carl Beau 
(phonetic spelling). 

You have no doubt heard the story: Once upon a time, under the Nazi 
regime in Germany, a man worked on an assembly line in a baby carriage 
factory. His wife was going to have a baby, but the Nazi government 
would not let anybody buy a baby carriage. The man decided he would 
secretly collect one part from each department and assemble the 
carriage himself. When this was done he and his wife gathered up the 
pieces and assembled it. When they were finished they did not have a 
baby carriage, they had a machine gun. 

And that is exactly the situation that I am going to present to you at 
this time. The center for the Study for Democratic Institutions 
recently completed a proposed constitution for the "Newstates of 
America." The Center is Rockefeller funded. To give you an indication 
of the type of constitution proposed, the term "national emergency" is 
mentioned 134 times. The document did not have a Bill of Rights and 
the right to own arms was taken away. At the same time, House 
Concurrent Resolution #28 awaited for calling a constitutional 
convention on or before July 4, 1976. The presiding officer of such an 
event would have been Nelson Rockefeller, Vice President and president 
pro tem of the Senate. This particular resolution awaited in 
committee. Obviously, money would not be spent on these massive 
programs unless there would be the chance for the actual 
implementation of such a scheme. 

However, in case the American people do not voluntarily adopt a new 
constitution less troublesome to those who desire dictatorship, there 
is Executive Order #11490, which will include its predecessors when it 
is cited herein. The Executive Order authorizes the secretaries of the 
various agencies to prepare for any "national emergency" type 
situation--including, but not limited to, those specified in the 
Executive Order itself. If you read the Order, there is nothing at all 
left to the imagination. For any conceivable pretext, a national 
emergency may be declared based upon this frightening decree, dated 
October 1969. The Order itself was prefaced in March of 1969 by 
another Executive Order that established the federal regions and their 
capitals. All the departments of the government were involved, 
including the L.E.A.A. (Law Enforcement Assistance Administration) and 
H.E.W. (Health, Education, and Welfare). Congressman Larry McDonald 
has revealed to Congress that various guerrilla and terrorist groups 
were being financed by the federal government. If they (the terrorist 
groups) actually began in search of activities, Executive Order #11490 
would be activated. But as mentioned previously, if you will read 
Executive Order #11490, you will see that a "national emergency" may 
be declared for any conceivable pretext whatsoever. If the Order 
itself were activated, here is what would happen. The next day you and 
your family would be standing in front of your local post office with 
your neighbors the front doors bursting with block-long lines of 
people waiting to be registered. After waiting in line with your 
family for hours, you finally get channeled through the doors. Once 
inside, you overhear the postal clerk with his sidearm on telling a 
frightened registrant, "Look there is nothing I can do. The truck 
behind the building will take you to a work camp where you have been 
assigned. Your wife has been assigned to a factory and there's nothing 
I can do." Then your son or daughter looks up at you with a quivering 
voice and asks, "Dad, why are we here?" 


IMPLEMENTING THE NEW GOVERNMENT 

Well, you see there's much more to life in a "free country" than 
paying your mortgage. You have to be aware of what is going on and act 
accordingly and participate in government, that is, get involved. 
Examine the organization chart on Executive Order #11490 to discover 
how we have all helped finance (through our tax dollars) the mechanics 
of the overthrow of our Constitution. Executive Order #11490 
designates certain authorities to the Office of Preparedness--which in 
turn designates authority to the various departments of the federal 
government. 

If the Order were implemented, the Post Office department would be 
responsible for a national registration. The State Department would be 
responsible for the protection of the United Nations personnel or 
property and prevention of escape from the United States. The 
Department of Defense would be responsible for its expropriation of 
industry; direction of service and national production system, control 
of censorship; and communication expropriation of non-industrial 
facilities. The Commerce Department would be responsible for 
expropriation, selection and international distribution of commodities 
(which would be the actual looting of the United States), census 
information and human resources 

The Treasury Department would be responsible for collection of cash 
and non-cash items and the recreation of evidence of assets and 
liabilities. The Justice Department would have concurrent 
responsibility with the Dept. of State for prevention of escape from 
the U.S.; for replenishing the stockpile of narcotics; for a national 
police force; for correctional and penal institutions; for mass 
feeding and housing of prisoners and for use of prisoners to augment 
manpower--which would be slave labor. 

The Federal Bulk (which is not a FEDERAL bank) would be responsible 
for regulation of withdrawal of currency. The G.S.A. (General Services 
Administration) would be responsible for confiscation of private 
property for government use. H.E.W. would be responsible for 
nationalization of education (which the Dept. of Education has already 
done), health services, hospital and mental institutions. The Labor 
Dept. would be responsible for recruiting manpower, referring 
manpower, and allocating manpower so each particular person that was 
registered at the post office in this national registration would be 
told where he (or she) was going to work. H.U.D. (Housing & Urban 
Development) would be responsible for emergency enforcement and 
control and movement of passengers and the emergency operation of the 
Alaskan railroad. 

There are two specific agencies here that we need to look at and to 
keep in mind. They are: H.E.W. and the Justice Dept., as those two 
agencies are related to the Dept. of Defense. The various military 
departments are part of the Dept. of Defense. Under it, we have the 
Secretary of Army, Chief of Staff, Deputy Chief of Staff of Personnel 
and law enforcement, U.S. Army's forces command, and continental Army 
Reserve & National Guard. And under that we have the four armies 
dividing up the United States. Under the Fifth Army we have the 
provost marshal, who is directly connected to the Deputy Chief of 
Staff for law enforcement personnel. Under the provost Marshall for 
the Fifth Army we have the 300 Military Police Prisoner-of War (POW) 
Command at Lebonia, Michigan. 

At this point I quote from retired Admiral Elmo Zumoff's (phonetic 
spelling) book, "On Watch": Kissinger states, 'I believe the American 
people lack the will to do the things necessary to achieve parity and 
to maintain maritime superiority.  I believe we must get the best deal 
we can in our negotiations before the United States and the Soviets 
both perceive these changes and the balance that occurs. When these 
perceptions are in agreement, and both sides know the U.S. is 
inferior, we must have gotten the best deal we can. Americans at that 
time will not be happy that I have settled for second, but it will be 
too late. " 

Zumoff said, 'Then why not take it to the American people? They will 
not accept the decision to become second best while we are in a 
position of Gross National Product twice that of the U.S.S.R." 

Kissinger responds, "That's a question of judgment. I judge that we 
will not get their support, and if we seek it and tell the fact as we 
would have to, we would lose our negotiating leverage with the 
Soviets." 

Zumoff stated, "But isn't that the ultimate immorality in a democracy; 
to make a decision for the people of such importance without 
consulting them?" 

Kissinger stated, "Perhaps, but I doubt that there are one million who 
could even understand the issue. 

Zumoff responded, "Even if that presumption is correct, those one 
million can influence the opinions of the majority of the people. I 
believe it is my duty to take the other course." 

Kissinger responded, "You should take care, lest your words result in 
a reduction in the Navy budget." 

So we see what the intention of the State Dept. is regarding the 
people. Another fact: On December 30, 1974, the California National 
Guard announced in a press release (which I have) that the state's 
Military Police battalions were organized and trained to provide 
immediate response to virtually every civil and man-made disaster, as 
well as to assist law enforcement officers in emergency situations to 
carry out their law enforcement as well as their military mission. 
When I asked four of the defendants in this case for their mission 
statement they did not provide it_although they say it is public 
information. 

The training spoken of for the California National Guard covers such 
subjects as dealing with individual civilians/civil population, 
detention procedures, citizen's rights, and similar matters. You know 
as well as I do that when there is Martial Law, or Martial Rule, 
citizens have no rights-because the Constitution is pre-empted. Even 
the uniforms of the National Guards who participate in this program 
are different from the regular uniforms. Army spokesmen will not 
reveal more about the uniforms. But the Los Angeles Sheriff's Dept. 
Paramilitary units, who have received this training also, have army 
fatigues dyed black for their uniforms. 

A further fact is the disaster preparedness plan for the Marine Corps 
Supply Center in Barstow, CA. Quoting from that document: 'Under the 
Constitution and the laws of the United States, the preservation of 
law and order is the responsibility of local and state government. The 
authority to maintain the peace and enforce the law is invested in the 
authorities of those governments.' There are specific exceptions to 
the above concept. One of these pertains to federal intervention to 
the civil disturbances in certain situations.  Military commanders are 
deemed to have the inherent authority to take any measure reasonably 
necessary for the protection of life and property in the event of a 
sudden unexpected public calamity which disrupts the normal process of 
government and presents an emergency so eminent as to make it 
dangerous to await the instructions from appropriate authorities. This 
includes law enforcement duties. The manual mentions something called 
"Garden plot Forces," which will discuss at length in a few minutes. 

Don Bell (who writes a weekly report) reported on July 25, 1975 that 
in May of '75 the 303 Civil Affairs group of the U.S. Army Reserves in 
Kearny, NJ conducted an exercise to sharpen plans for a military 
takeover of the state government in NJ. According to Colonel Frances 
Clark, they had conducted similar studies on how to seize municipal 
and county government over the past few years. But this was the first 
time they had studies STATE government. Such units were trained during 
World War II to operate captured governments in the foreign. We never 
had federal troops training to take over government in the United 
States. When local violence of catastrophe struck, the National Guard-
-under command of the governor--went into action. This is definitely 
not the situation at this time... 

CONTROLLING THE MASSES 

On February 16, 1975, in 'San Gabriel Valley Tribune' it was reported 
that the L.E.A.A. (funded by the Dept. of Justice) and the Police 
Foundation (funded by the Ford Foundation) were prime movers toward 
implementing a national police force. Each, however, contends they 
support local police agencies. The total program involves military 
units that have the function of taking ova the administration of local 
and state governments. That program is "Operation Cable Splicer"_by 
Army civil affairs groups, a sub-plan of "Operation Garden Plot" (the 
Martial Law program). 

The method by which the national police concept is being presented to 
the public has changed. It was first disguised under the cover of 
protection against civil disturbances. This program was as follows: 

A) Keep the people from gathering in the streets.
B) Isolate and neutralize the revolution's leadership.
C) Dispersal of crowds and demonstrators.

This is followed by successful prosecution in order to: I) Validate 
the action of the police; 2) Denying the arrestees propaganda 
materials, and, 3) Denying them the opportunity to recover money 
damages against the police for arresting them. 

Let me quote for you the scenario which was developed for Cable 
Splicer One, Two, and Three to justify the needs for dealing with 
civil disturbances "Phase One - an arrest and shooting provoke crowd 
unrest and threats against public officials and a riot begins to form: 
Phase Two - police vehicles are ambushed, various attempted 
assassinations of public officials occur, destruction and raiding of 
armories occur, and thousands of people begin to gather and local 
police lose control, Phase Three increased movements of rioters and 
the crowds must be dispersed before they become sympathetic with the 
rioters. The National Guard and the local police lose control." 

This scenario provides for an orderly transition from state to federal 
control. The Deputy Attorney General of California commented at a 
Cable Splicer Three conference, that anyone who attacks the State--
even verbally becomes a revolutionary and an enemy by definition.  
They are the enemy and must be destroyed.  This program was taught in 
almost every state west of the Mississippi River and included as 
participants local active military, reserve military and civilian 
police.  The course name was "Civil Emergency Management Course."  The 
official explanation that was to be given if any questions were asked 
about the program was: "This activity is a continuous, joint law 
enforcement military liaison effort and a continuation of coordination 
established last year." 

In 1976, the 'Oakland Tribune' carried the most complete explanation 
of what is planned. It is reported in its entirety in the 'National 
Chronicle' which added an analysis to the story. (The 'Oakland 
Tribune's editor died suddenly after the story was published). And I 
quote: 

"Last Saturday the California National Guard unveiled a new Law 
Enforcement Assistance Force- L.E.A.F., a specially trained and 
outfitted Military Police Unit, whose members will serve as shock 
troops in the state's war against political protesters and 
demonstrators. 

"I saw a full-dress exhibition of what the California National Guard 
has planned for the next American revolution. Helicopters, SWAT teams, 
civilian military policemen in jackboots and helmets, twelve-gauge 
shotguns, .38 and .45 caliber pistols, radios, walkie-talkies, and 
electrically controlled intelligence centers wired for instant 
communications with any police force in one state. 

"L.E.A.F. is a 1,000 member unit put together this year to handle 
unique law enforcement problems such a mass civil disobedience, 
protest demonstrations and riots.  In other words, breaking heads and 
taking names.  L.E.A.F. has the support of Governor Brown, a quarter 
million dollars worth of grants from the federal government, and no 
public opposition from civil liberties' groups. 

"For all its ineptitude however, L.E.A.F. has a frightening 
possibility from a civil liberty standpoint.  It is a direct product 
of the California "Cable Splicer" conferences--a series of high-level 
secret meetings between government officials, law enforcement 
officials and military planners held during the late '60s and early 
'70s.  The meetings were held as late as 1975 so far, as many public 
records show.  These were the conferences which Counter-Spy magazine 
had identified as California's "Garden Plot Sub-plan." 

'Gary Davis, Governor Brown's right hand man, says L.E.A.F. is to 
assist civil police, not to replace them. Gary says, "Civilians could 
expect a civilian type law enforcement rather than what is commonly 
known as Martial Law."  Despite this assurance, L.E.A.F.'s exercises 
look disturbingly like the military coup described in the novel, 
"Seven Days In May. " 

'L.E.A.F. soldiers with nightsticks stood at intersections, stopping 
cars with suspicious occupants, checking I.D. cards and generally 
intimidating onlookers with their SWAT style uniforms, their sidearms 
and helmets.  Perhaps more ominously, several participants in the 
role-playing exercises Saturday admitted that even under simulated 
pressure there has already been a number of incidents where the 
L.E.A.F. troops used excessive force to quell disturbances - even 
though their orders forbade it.' (That ends the quotation.) 

Former L.E.A.A. Administrator, Charles Ross Dovan (phonetic spelling), 
is on record as having stated that local law enforcement has failed 
and must be replaced by a national police force.  Patrick Murphy, the 
administrator of the Police Foundation, states, "I have no fear of a 
national police force.  Our 40,000 police departments are not sacred."  
Ex-Attorney General William Saxby warned that if we can go on as we 
are, crime will invade us and the national police will take over. 

For the policemen who do not cooperate and still want to be policemen, 
there is the program of Contemporary Research, Inc.--an organization 
of psychologists, sociologists, education specialists and economic 
experts--who work toward a solution of many of today's social 
problems.  The same organization develops specialized computer base 
systems for law enforcement agencies at all levels of government. 

The L.E.A.A. alone will receive over a billion dollars a year over the 
next four years_even though it has been ineffective against crime.  
This is because the L.E.A.A. is not geared to fighting crime, it is 
geared to developing a system for takeover of the United States with 
the assistance of the Dept. of Defense. 

THE PLANNED POLICE STATE 

One of the programs the L.E.A.A. works on in its fight against crime 
is psycho-surgery.  If you don't cooperate with their programs, you 
are merely operated on so that you will be as cooperative as an adding 
machine.  Or, the L.E.A.A. supports drug research for the same 
purpose--to neurological source's violence.  Hence, as an example, if 
a law were passed whereby the ownership of firearms was declared to be 
illegal, you would be placed in one of these programs if you did not 
cooperate.  The L.E.A.A. control exercise (at the state's level) is 
from the Office of Criminal Justice Planning of the Governor's office.  
Here in Texas, Mr. Robert C. Klowers is still the executive director 
in that office.  But all states have that particular department. 

In May 1975 the 'L.E.A.A. Newsletter' describes the function of one of 
its organizations: the National Institute of Law Enforcement & 
Criminal Justice.  This organization funds something called the 
'United Nations Clearinghouse" in Rome, Italy.  The function of that 
organization is, among other things, the exchange of Criminal Justice 
System information with the Soviet Union.  It goes without saying that 
we have nothing to learn from the Criminal Justice System of the 
Soviet Union.  These incredible projects are being funded with our tax 
dollars. 

The code names for these projects are: "Garden Plot" and "Cable 
Splicer. " Garden Plot is the program to control the population.  
Cable Splicer is the program for an orderly takeover of the state and 
local governments by the federal government. 

An investigation was completed in Nov., 1975 by four sources: The 
Conservative publication, 'American Challenge' the leftist 'New 
Times'; the foundation financed Fund for Investigative Journalism, 
and, Don Wood of the trustworthy 'Ozark Sunbeam. ' It involves the 
potential creation of a Police State through the use of the Pentagon 
and its computerized intelligence dossier (lodged in the Pentagon 
basement) of thousands of citizens by the National Guard, state and 
local police departments, the L.E.A.A., plainclothes military forces, 
SWAT teams, and the Dept. of Justice. 

Brigadier General J. L. Julienit (phonetic spelling), senior Army 
officer of the Pentagon National Guard Bureau, has admitted, "I know 
of no state that did not have some form of these exercises within the 
last year." 

Today the Cable Splicer handbook is composed of six loose-leaf, three-
ring binders that are merely an outline for the impending takeover and 
destruction of our Constitution.  The Sixth Army used the term "Cable 
Splicer" for the name of the operation, but it has not revealed the 
name of the operation in the other military areas within the U. S. 

On page 4, paragraph 10 on Public Information, the instructions state: 
"As a means to prevent adverse publicity or misleading psychological 
effects in regard to coordinating, planning, and conducting this 
exercise, all military participants involved will perform such duties 
in civilian clothing when exercise oriented activities are conducted 
at law enforcement facilities.  In the event inquiries are received 
regarding this exercise, the response should be limited to identifying 
the activity as a continuous, joint law enforcement military liaison 
effort and a continuation of coordination established last year." On 
page 6, security guidance is explained to the effect that if anybody 
asks any questions, limit the information that is given out on the 
basis of it being in the interest of 'national interest' (security). 

Now, in the festivities celebrating the success of completion of the 
exercises, Attorney General Stanly R. Larsen, the commanding general 
of the Sixth Army stated, "The most serious challenge facing all of us 
will be the challenge of discharging our legitimate responsibilities.  
For a significant portion of a society at large is likely to regard us 
with suspicion and to question, even challenge, our authority on the 
basic assumption of our profession.  Part of this challenge we must be 
prepared to deal with; a potentially dangerous portion of our society 
which in truth, could well become the domestic enemy. 

The manual includes instructions on operation of confinement 
facilities, handling and processing prisoners_including searching, 
transporting, feeding, housing and handling of the special class of 
persons called "detainees." The plan also specifically includes a 
proposition for confiscation of privately owned weapons and 
ammunition. 

FILES ON POTENTIAL PRISONERS 

The Army has over 350 separate record centers containing substantial 
information on civilian political activities. Virtually every major 
Army unit has its own set aside from this.  The Fifth Army of San 
Antonio has over 100,000 files of its own.  The overall operation 
command post is a domestic room at the Pentagon.  There are 25 million 
cards on individuals and 760,000 on organizations held by the Defense 
Central Index of investigations alone.  This information includes 
political, sociological, economical and psychological profiles. All 
this type of information on 25 million Americans. 

Since 1970 local county and state police forces all over the country 
have undertaken crash programs to install various kinds of 
computerized information systems.  A large portion of this is being 
paid for my the L.E.A.A.  Beginning in 1970, Congress and the Joint 
Chiefs of Staff ordered the destruction of all these data banks, but 
they were not destroyed.  All the outlawed collection is now located 
at Mt. Weather, Clark County, West Virginia and similar Pentagon 
facilities designed as adjuncts to the president's emergency powers 
under the Executive Orders. 

The cadre of specialized persons to enforce this plan are found in the 
U. S. Army Reserves Military Police POW Command at Lebonia, Michigan.  
Mr. Fenren (phonetic spelling) of the 300th Military Police POW 
Command at Lebonia told me, when I called him from the Federal 
Information Center at Houston, that the camps in the Command were for 
foreign prisoners-of-war and for "enemies of the United States."  I 
asked him if enemies of the United States included U.S. citizens.  He 
became an_, wouldn't deny it, and referred me to a very sinister 
individual at the Army Reserve facility here at Houston whom I talked 
to; who explained to me that the prisoners were called "inventory" and 
"internees." He would not deny that the camps were for U.S. citizens. 

I called the Pentagon, spoke with the defendant there, and then with 
the provost Marshal for the Fifth Army, and do you know what?  Not one 
of these persons would deny that the system was for U.S. citizens.  
The provost marshal for the Fifth Army--when I mentioned the names of 
all the camp sites--said, "Well at least you've got that right." 

The names of the detention facilities that I gave him were a list that 
I had acquired from the 'Ozark Sunbeam.'  That list of names was the 
same list of facilities designated under the old Detention Act of 1950 
as "emergency detention centers." But there is only one problem: That 
act was supposed to have been repealed in 1971. After some research, I 
found out what the problem was. One Congressman-when the hearings were 
held for the repeal of the Emergency Detention Act--mentioned that 
there are 17 other bits of law that provided for the same thing. So it 
didn't matter whether they ever repealed the Emergency Detention Act. 
The public was in fact tricked by the Congress of the United States! 

Here are the designated sites: Tucked away in the Appalachian 
Mountains of central Pennsylvania is a bustling town of approximate 
10,000 people. Fifteen to twenty years ago it was a sleepy village of 
400. Allanwood, PA is linked to New York City by Interstate U.S. 80. 
It takes up approximately 400 acres and is surrounded by a 10-foot 
barbed wire fence. It now holds approximately 300 minimum security 
prisoners to keep in shape. It could hold 12,000 people from one day 
to the next. 

Thirty miles from Oklahoma City on U.S. 66 is El Reno, OK with an 
approximate population of 12,000. Due west, six miles from town almost 
in sight of U.S. 66 is a complex of buildings that could pass for a 
small school. However, the facility is overshadowed by a guard house 
that appears to be something like an airport control tower--except 
that it's manned by a vigilant, uniformed guard. This is a federal 
prison camp or detention center. These camps are all located near 
super-highways or near railroad tracks or both. 

The federal prison camp at Florence, Arizona could hold 3,500 
prisoners. It is presently kept in condition by approximately 400 
legally convicted prisoners. Wickenberg, AZ is famous for its 
municipal airport that was once government owned. It is now occupied 
by a private party. It is rumored to be capable of being taken back by 
the federal government without notice. 

Now there are a couple other of these facilities that are probably 
existing under the same arrangements. This particular rumor of instant 
taking back without notice has existed for about 9 or 10 years. The 
only way it can actually be established is by looking at the local 
contract for the Wickenberg Municipal Airport itself and the parties 
that have possession of it. 

As I mentioned previously, these names were ratified by the provost 
marshal of the Fifth Army who is in charge of the 300th Military 
Police POW Command. He is the one who verified them. He said, as I 
mentioned before, "Well at least you've got that right." 

Some of the locations are: Tool Lake in California--now in private 
hands. It can be retaken without notice. Some of the others: We have 
Mill Point, West Virginia. I couldn't find a thing on Mill Point, WV 
but in that area we have all kinds of prisons. Among them are: 
Alderson, WV, a women's federal reformatory, Lewisburg, WV, a federal 
prison; Greenville, SC in Greenville County is now occupied by the 
State Youthful Offenders Division. Even that is a mystery to the 
people of that area. 

At Montgomery, AL we have a federal civilian prison camp at Maxwell 
Air Force Base. Now does that sound right? There's one at Tucson, AZ, 
David Munson Air Base. In Alaska we have Elmendorf at Eielson Air 
Force Base. 

That brings us to a facility in Florida, called Avon Park, FL. He 
found the Avon Park Bombing and Gunnery Range, which is also listed as 
the Avon Park Correctional Institute. No one is permitted entrance and 
probably there is no overfly permitted because it is a bombing and 
gunnery range. This was one of the places ratified by the provost 
marshal of the Fifth Army. 

In 1976, as well as on March 20, 1979,1 went to the sheriffs Dept. in 
Houston to see if our local sheriff's Dept. had been infiltrated by 
these plans. Well, it appears so. I was put in contact with a Lt. 
Kiljan (phonetic spelling) who is in charge of some secret unit in the 
department. I asked him if he had participated in military training 
with military personnel here in the Sheriff s Dept. He denied it, and 
when I asked him if he would testify so under oath he became angry and 
stated, "You are just an ordinary citizen. I don't have to tell you 
anything." I later discovered that Lt. Kiljan is the ex-director of 
the Houston branch office of the U. S . Secret Service. Now where does 
his money come from? The area is administered by the Houston-Galveston 
Area Council. 

In this regional-government plan, each federal region is divided into 
state clearinghouses, and each state clearinghouse is divided into 
area clearinghouses. And for our area we have the Houston-Galveston 
Area Council.. It serves as a conduit for federal funds in two major 
areas L.E.A.A. and H.E.W 

Most everybody thinks this organization (the Houston-Galveston area 
Council) is for the development of the area--the geographical area 
here in Houston.  But it is not.  It is for the development of 
L.E.A.A. and H.E.W. projects.  Now this finds its counterpart in every 
community across the U.S. It provides for these agencies a liaison for 
inter-governmental communications, interaction and coordination. 

MENTAL COOPERATION IN TAKEOVER PLANS 

I examined their projects to see what they were doing. This region-
government program distributes federal funds for two major purposes: 
1) Radio hook-ups between every police agency in the state to Fort Sam 
Houston, and: 2) Mental health programs, including programs for the 
mentally ill having priority of beds and hospitals. 

Another interesting fact to consider is that in the Pine Bluff 
Arkansas Arsenal '3-Z" is stored. It's a nerve gas which creates 
sleepiness, dizziness, stupor, and the incapacity to move about. 
According to the Associated Press, the agent can be sprayed by 
aerosol, injected or sprayed over large areas by a bomb. The Military 
has admitted that one potential use of the gas is for civilian 
control. So whatever they planned, they've also planned a way for you 
to go to your destination in a tranquil state of mind. 

H.E.W., by law, is operated in conjunction with the United Nations 
through the World Health Organization. Back in 1948, the International 
Congress on Mental health U.N. organization-declared in its pamphlet, 
'Mental Health and World Citizenship, ' that, "prejudice, hostility or 
excessive nationalism may become deeply imbedded in the developing 
personality without awareness on the part of the individual concerned. 
In order to be effective, efforts of changing individuals must be 
appropriate to the successive stages of the unfolding personality. In 
the case of almost any group of individuals, change will be strongly 
resisted unless an attitude of acceptance has first been engendered. 

"Principles of mental health cannot be successfully furthered in any 
society unless there is progressive acceptance of the concept of world 
citizenship," the document states.  "Programs for social change to be 
effective require a joint effort of psychiatrists and social 
scientists, working together in cooperation with statesmen, 
administrators and others in positions of responsibility." 

The three phases of the development are: 1) Mental hospitals for 
segregation, care and protection of persons of unsound minds. 2) 
Community Mental Health Care Centers so that persons may be treated in 
their own neighborhood. 3) Child Care Centers for dealing with early 
difficulties of nationalism in a child's life. 

Two years earlier, Major General G. B. Chisholm, Deputy Minister of 
Health in Canada_ who later became director of United Nations World 
Health Organization--explained, "Self defense may involve a neurotic 
reaction when it means defending one's own excessive material wealth 
from others who are in great need. This attitude leads to war..."  So 
his solution to the problem is: 'Set's redistribute the wealth among 
everyone. 

Further, the re-interpretation and eventual eradication of the 
individual's concept of right and wrong-which has been the basis of 
child training are the belated objectives of practically all effective 
psychotherapies. Now if we digress even further, to Buria (phonetic 
spelling), the director of the Soviet Secret Police in the 1930's, we 
see he explained the communist political strategy through the use of 
"mental heating" of psychiatry: 

"Psycho-politics is the art and science of asserting and of 
maintaining a dominion over the thoughts and loyalties of individuals, 
officers, bureaus, and masses, and the effecting of the conquest of 
enemy nations through mental healing. You must work,: he stated, 
"Until every teacher of psychology unknowingly or knowingly teaches 
only communistic doctrine under the guise of psychology." 

If you look at the Russian manual of instruction of psycho-political 
warfare, we see in chapter nine, "Psycho-political operations should 
at all times be alert to the Opportunities to organize for the 
betterment of the community mental health centers." 

Now, under the new national Mental Health program, at this moment 
there are more than 600 of these community mental health centers 
across the United States. The whole thing was promoted by Dr. Stanly 
F. Yoles (phonetic spelling), who was the director of the National 
Institute of Mental Health in 1969. He stated back then, that the 
newest trend in treating mental illness is care at local health care 
centers where the patient is not isolated from his (or her) family and 
friends. They have been working on this program for 46 years publicly, 
and now across the U.S._through your tax dollars_you have 603 centers 
(to be exact), Community Health Centers that are all part of this 
program. 

This is how they are part of the program. (It has already happened): 
In the mid-1950's, there were set into motion an interesting chain of 
events. About 1956, the Alaska Mental Health Bill was proposed and 
later passed. It granted approximately $12 million and one million 
acres of public land to Alaska so that it could develop its own mental 
health program. Now this was a little abnormal since Alaska only had a 
little over 400 people who were classified as mentally ill! 

After the bill was passed, Alaska passed its own enabling legislation 
to get into the mental health business. They started by adopting the 
essential elements of the Public Health Service Draft Act on the 
hospitalization of the mentally ill in the old 'interstate Compact on 
Mental Health"_now called the Uniform Mental Health Act. There were no 
provisions for jury trial in it or anything else. You would just be 
picked up and taken to the Alaskan-Siberian Asylum-incommunicado_and 
the state would also confiscate all of your personal and real 
property! They actually tried to do it in 1954 in the case of Ford vs. 
Milinak (phonetic spelling), which declared the act as adopted in 
another state (the state of Missouri) as unconstitutional. 

But the act itself still exists_and modified_but essentially in the 
same form, the Uniform Mental Health Act, to which approximately six 
states subscribe.  And in passing most State Constitutions-if you will 
check them from the period of 1935-made a part of their constitution 
the practice of having a person submit to a 90-day mental examination 
to determine his (or her) sanity, without any provisions for a trail 
by jury. This was part of the national program at that time. 

In this act, the governor could have anyone picked up and sent to the 
Mental Health Institution in Alaska or elsewhere. The results of 
rumors back in the '50s, were that there was in fact a sinister, 
Frankenstein-type mental health person in Alaska. I wrote to Alaska 
(the officials, that is) and asked them for a description of the kind 
of one million acres that they were eligible to receive under the 
Alaska Mental Health Act. I also asked them for a copy of the 
inventory they ran for their facilities back at that same time. Well, 
so far no answer. And probably, I will never receive an answer without 
a court order. 

Through the years, there was a spot in Alaska that was continually 
referred to: Southeast of Fairbanks, southwest of Fairbanks, northwest 
of Fairbanks--somewhere near Fairbanks. Then I received information 
that a pilot had flown over the entire area once and had had his 
license revoked. So, for S1.85 each, I ordered the low-level 
navigation maps from the federal government for Alaska and located the 
Alaska-Siberian Asylum for the treatment of enemies of the United 
States. It's right where rumor over the past 20 years had placed it: 
Southwest of Fairbanks. It stands out like a sore thumb! It's the only 
one of that geometric configuration within the state of Alaska, and 
you will note a black line running up through Fairbanks and down over 
near that area of the map. That is the railroad that the Dept. of 
Transportation would take the emergency operation of under the 
Executive Order--if the Executive Order went into effect. H.E.W. would 
be responsible for making a determination of whether or not you were 
mentally disturbed because of your nationalistic tendencies, your love 
for the United States, or your adherence to any political or religious 
doctrine. 

Let's look a little further into the type of program that the L.E.A.A. 
is paying for through the Dept. of Justice. The Federal Bureau of 
Prisons--located in the backwoods of North Carolina, near a tiny 
village called Butner--is constructing a mammoth 42 acre research 
complex for prisoners from throughout the East. Who will be sent for 
experiments to test new behavioral programs and techniques? Target 
date for completion of the entire system is ironically 1984. 

So, they're using right now, under the L.E.A.A. program, something 
called anectine (phonetic spelling). Punishment for troublesome 
behavior within the prison is being done by drugs and shock, likely to 
be the most selected examples of programs that have made use of 
anectine--a derivative of South American curare. Anectine was 
originally used as a beginning factor to electro-convulsive shock. 
Such shocks applied to the head are so strong they can break and graze 
pores under the strain, resulting in muscle contractions. Since 
anectine paralyzes the muscles without diminishing consciousness or 
the ability to feel pain. By first injecting the inmates with it, 
researchers can turn up the voltage as high as they want without 
cracking the inmates' skeleton when his body is thrown into 
convulsions by the jolt. 

What the anectine does, in short, is to simulate death within 30 to 40 
seconds of injection. It brings on paralysis first, with the small 
rapidly moving muscles in the nose, fingers, and eyes; then in the 
diaphragm and the cardiovascular system. As a result, the patient 
cannot move or breath and yet remains fully conscious, as though 
drowning and dying. This is from the 1974 publication, 'Human 
Behavior. 

THE PEOPLE VS. THE CONSPIRATORS 

The federal government answered my suit in June (1976) by filing an 
unsworn general denial of everything that I had alleged. I spoke with 
the assistant U.S. Attorney in charge of the case and asked him if he 
had gone to the trouble to call any of the parties mentioned in the 
suits--since I had provided not only the addresses, but their 
telephone numbers to provide a faster means of investigation. He said 
he had not. He had not even done a minimal amount of investigation of 
the case, but yet he filed a denial of my allegations. 

I filed a motion in the meantime to take the deposition of the person 
who writes the training programs for the concentration camp guards, 
Mr. Richard Burrage--the 75th Maneuver Air Command at Army Reserve 
Center at Houston, Texas--stating that in light of all the recent 
activity of government agents, one of the agencies involved might 
attempt to murder this key witness, the author of the training camp 
program. The federal judge denied my motion, stating that I had not 
quoted enough cases to him justifying my request. However, he was also 
aware as that there were no cases existing on this set of facts, but 
as you will see as I go along with this report, he chose to ignore it. 

I then made an agreement with the assistant U. S. Attorney to take the 
deposition to Mr. Burrage. After I'd made the arrangements, the U.S. 
Attorney refused to voluntarily go along with taking the deposition. 
It is very difficult to find justice in our system of courts. It is a 
corruption-driven system founded upon the buddy system, and hence, the 
court rules are routinely overlooked or not followed. 

On July 20, a hearing was held at the magistrate of Norman Black, U.S. 
District Court in Houston. The courtroom was completely filled with 
spectators. Although the news media had been contacted, no 
representatives of the press were there. There is a news media 
blackout on this matter here in Houston. 

Brief oral arguments were presented. The U.S. Attorney explained that 
I was not the proper person to bring the suit because, although the 
free exercise of my constitutional rights was threatened by the 
concentration camp program as alleged, it did not constitute my 
injury. The magistrate was impressed with the information I had thus 
far collected and stated that he would bring it to the attention of 
the federal judge.  The U.S. Attorney tried to have my investigation 
of the case halted, but the magistrate would not go along that far 
with a pre-arranged decision. 

As an additional indication of what I was up against, the original 
hearing was scheduled for 10:30 in the morning. However, the U.S. 
Attorney had secretly had the time changed to 2:30 in the afternoon. 
The magistrate gave the U.S. Attorney permission to file for motion to 
dismiss because he felt that the concentration camp program--to be 
used for persons who exercise their freedom of speech--did not present 
any injury. 

Now, on July 23 I had placed in the 'Houston Post' and in the 'Houston 
Chronicle' newspapers the following advertisement in the legal 
section. Quote: "Solicitation for witnesses in Civil Action 78-H 667, 
Federal District Court of Houston, People extemporal William Pabst vs. 
Gerald Ford et d. The action titled: Complaint Against the 
Concentration Camp Program of the Dept. of Defense. Attention: If you 
have participated in Operation Garden Plot, Operation Cable Splicer, 
the 300th Military Police Prisoner of War Command, or the Army Reserve 
Civil Affairs group, you may be involved in a program that needs to be 
disclosed for this suit. To give your testimony call or write; (and 
here I placed my name address and telephone number). 

As I previously mentioned, there is a news media blackout on the story 
here in Houston. Both newspapers refused to carry the ad. First, at 
the 'Houston Post,' I had to threaten them with a lawsuit to carry out 
the ad, even though I was paying for it. Then, at the 'Chronicle' I 
had to meet with the president and various vice presidents because a 
refusal from that paper had come up from their own lawyers. Both 
newspapers finally carried it, but only after two days of complaining. 
The initial response of both papas was, "We don't carry stories like 
that" and: "Don't you think that the people planning the concentration 
camps have our best interest in mind?" As you will hear for 
yourselves, the policies definitely do not reflect our best interests. 

The next event that occurred was that the U.S. Attorney filed a 
"Statement of Authority," showing the reasons he could find why I 
should not be allowed to take depositions to get more information from 
the person who was writing the concentration camp guard training 
program. However, his brief was completely filled with misquotes of 
the law from many cases. He'd mention the case and then invent 
whatever the case should say. In my brief to the court at this point, 
I notified the judge of the violation of the law requiring honesty in 
such matters. But, the notification was ignored by the judge, who 
apparently sanctioned this most dishonest of acts, commonly known as 
"quoting out of context." 

THE GENEVA CONVENTION 

My brief was filed on August 27. On August 31, formal arguments were 
set. The new courtroom of the magistrate was almost filled again. 
However, no one from the news media showed up for this hearing either. 
The few who were contacted had been told not to go; they would lose 
their jobs. 

At the hearing I introduced evidence that heretofore had never been 
introduced in any court of law in the U.S. The U.S. Attorney had 
denied, you will remember, everything in my suit without so much as 
even a tiny investigation. So, I introduced him to evidence the 
following letter from the Dept. of the Army, Office of the Deputy 
Chief of Staff of Personnel, signed by 1B Sergeant, Colonel G.S., 
Action Director of Human Resources Development. 

Quoting: "On behalf of President Ford, I am replying to your letter 27 
May, 1976, regarding a news article in the Dallas Morning News. As 
much as he would like to, the president cannot reply personally to 
every communication he receives. Therefore, he has asked the 
departments and agencies of the federal government in those instances 
where they have special knowledge or special authority underlogued. 

"For this reason your communication was forwarded to officials of the 
Dept. of Defense. Within the Dept. of Defense, the Army is responsible 
for custody and treatment of enemy prisoners of war and civilian 
internees as defined under terms of the Geneva Convention of 1949. 
Therefore, the Army is prepared to detain prisoners of war and 
detainees as defined in Article IV of the 1949 Geneva Convention 
relative to the treatment of prisoners of war and protection of 
civilian persons. 

'It is U.S. policy that its Armed Forces adhere to the provisions of 
international law to set the example for other countries of the world 
to follow and respecting the rights and dignity of those who become 
victim of international conflict. It should be noted that the Army 
program is designed for implementation during conditions of war 
between the U.S. and one or more foreign countries. The Army had no 
plans nor does it maintain detention camps to imprison American 
citizens during domestic crises." 

The problem with this letter is that it's not true, and that's what 
I'm going to discuss at this point. First of all, in verifying the 
authenticity of the claims in the letter, I checked the Geneva text. 
There is no article in the Geneva Convention entitled as the letter 
states. There is, however, on each of the classifications, "Protection 
of War Victims / Civilian Persons" and a separate article on 
"Prisoners of War." "That was the first discrepancy. 

Then I turned to Article IV of the Geneva Convention. That article did 
not set up any requirements or authorizations for military units of 
any type and does not even suggest it. Hence, the second discrepancy. 

The next problem with the letter from President Ford's representative 
is that it states that the prisoner of war guard program is set up for 
the implementation for "conditions of war between the U.S. and one or 
more (foreign) countries." However, Article III of the Geneva 
Convention reads that the treaty applies to (and I am quoting): 'In 
case of an armed conflict, not of an international character, 
occurring within the territory of one of the high contracting 
parties." Obviously and armed conflict occurring within one's own 
territory did not mean between one or more of the parties to the 
treaty, especially if only one is involved. Now, the examples of this 
type of conflict are: civil war, armed insurgency and guerrilla 
activities. In other words, they're speaking of a domestic conflict. 

An even more shocking item is found in the pages of the 1949 Geneva 
Convention under "Protection of War Victims/Civilian Persons." You 
will find the index card, the identification card, forms to be used to 
writing your family, and everything necessary for the administration 
of a concentration camp is contained in this treaty that the U.S. 
signed and ratified. Further, if there is a conflict in the U.S. 
involving only the U.S. this convention or treaty can go into 
operation_which includes the procedures for setting up the 
concentration camps. 

Article LXVIII of the Convention states (and I paraphrase): If you 
commit an offense that is solely intended to harm the occupying power, 
not harming the life or limb of members of the occupying power, but 
merely talking against such a force_such as the Martial Law situation 
you can be imprisoned provided that the duration of such imprisonment 
is proportionate to the offense committed. Well, President Dwight 
Eisenhower didn't feel that provision was strong enough. So he had the 
following additions placed in the treaty, which state: "The U.S. 
reserves the right to impose the death penalty in accordance with the 
previsions of Article LXVIII without regard to whether the offense is 
referred to therein are punishable by death under the law of the 
occupied territory at the time the occupation begins." 

So not only can you be imprisoned for having exercised freedom of 
speech; you can be put to death under the provisions of the Geneva 
Convention in 1949 for having exercised, or attempting to exercise 
freedom of speech. 

The next item that I introduced into evidence was a field manual; FM 
41-1-, '