From: David Weber 
Subject: [illusions] Criminal Govt Conspiracy - Behind the Scenes
Date: 10 May 2001 17:09:02 -0400
To: Illusions 

--=====================_59061560==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

Al Martin Raw: Criminal Govt Conspiracy - Behind the Scenes
Behind the scenes in the beltway
http://www.almartinraw.com/column12.html
by Al Martin
Aries II Down: Another Technology Transfer to China
In the continuing effort to make China the bogeyman of the 21st
century, Washington has scored yet another coup - the loss of the EP-3E
Aries II surveillance aircraft.
It's very reminiscent of the phony FBI Hanssen Spy Case. In other
words, what the US Government is saying just doesn't jibe with the facts.
The implausible government story states that the Aries II aircraft was
supposedly escorted by ancient Chinese F8 fighter planes to a Chinese
military base at Hainan Island.
The Aries II has an electronic counter-measure capability that could
completely fry the electronic components of a state-of-the-art MIG 29, let
alone a vintage Chinese F-8. Its defensive capability consists of highly
advanced directional microwave weaponry.
Also this US Navy aircraft uses technology that is proprietary to the
National Security Agency. Most of the technology on the aircraft is
electronic intercept in nature.
According to Department of Defense statements, all protocols were
broken. This indicates that the incident has been staged to create a
deliberate transfer of this technology. This technology is so advanced that
even the NSA was queasy about giving it to the Chinese.
Since this technology is not proprietary to the Department of Defense
and since the NSA directly controls the contractors who produce this
equipment, there wasn't any way for those who are in favor of transferring
this technology to China, as a matter of illegal covert State policy, to
effect this transfer without staging an international incident. Therefore an
incident had to be created to give the Chinese this technology.
Whoever was in charge of the aircraft command must have been in on it.
Otherwise they would not have had the authority to circumvent the protocols,
unless directly ordered to do so. The aircraft then would either be in
pieces and the crew would be floating in life rafts. Or they would all be
dead.
By the way, the military designation of the EP-3E Aries II aircraft is
high enough that all crew members carry cyanide capsules. They must not fall
into enemy hands for interrogation. And that is precisely where they are at
this moment.
The Department of Defense claims they know nothing -- another bogus
claim, since throughout the inside of the aircraft, there is a discreet
video system which continues to broadcast.
The Defense Department is also trying to imply that the Chinese are
jamming the signals, but what they're not saying is that the Chinese don't
have the technological capability to jam these signals. These are highly
advanced microburst transmissions that can even be bounced off of China's
own satellites. The Chinese would not even be aware of it. Russian and
Chinese equipment cannot even detect such complex microburst transmissions.
The protocol on this aircraft is very simple. If there was any chance
that the aircraft could fall into hostile hands, the crew is deemed to be
completely expendable. The protocol can only be overridden by the President
of the United States.
The only logical conclusion about this incident is that it is simply
an ongoing transfer of sophisticated technology to the Chinese military.
First, the government had admitted that there were 24 personnel on the
aircraft the "majority of which were US Navy personnel." The aircraft's has
19 operating stations, Who are the non-Navy personnel, which the government
refuses to identify?
Second, why did the crew not execute its emergency protocol and
destroy the aircraft?
The media is reporting that the crew is supposed to destroy the
technology by any means necessary. What they're not saying is that the
aircraft has a self-destruct mechanism already built in. It could have been
completely destroyed.
If it appears that the aircraft is about to fall into "hostile" hands,
the normal protocol is that the self-destruct mechanism is supposed to be
activated. If the aircraft is over international waters, they are supposed
to actually ditch the plane and land on the water. The aircraft is built, so
it can make an emergency water landing.
Since the Aries II is a naval aircraft, it is built to stay afloat
long enough for the crew to get out and the life rafts to automatically
inflate. The aircraft also carries emergency survival equipment with an
EBIRB, an emergency locating system.
The protocol then would have been to either destroy the plane or land
on the water, in which case, had the emergency self-destruct mechanism been
rendered inoperable for any reasons, as the plane began to sink, the
emergency self-destruct mechanism would have been activated automatically
when sea water came into contact with the amitol derivative explosives in
the mechanism. Amitol automatically explodes when sufficiently saturated by
seawater.
Even if the self-destruct mechanism had been rendered inoperable, as
the aircraft sank into the ocean and filled with seawater, it would have
automatically detonated. The question remains - why weren't these protocols
followed?
If the plane was able to travel an additional 76 miles and land on
hostile territory, why couldn't it have flown to Vietnamese territorial
waters? The US Government claims that the plane was "severely damaged" and
had to make an emergency landing.
How "severely damaged" could the plane have been and still have flown
76 miles to make a landing at a Chinese air force base?
The aircraft had to fly north when it could have simply turned west.
Since it was less than 76 miles from Vietnamese territorial waters, there
would have been no threat there given the extremely hostile relationship
between Vietnam and China regarding territorial disputes in that region.
One could almost say that the reason the protocol was not invoked was
because China was not considered a "hostile" country.
The "coincidental" nature of this international incident also plays
into the hands of the Republican right and the defense contractors clamoring
to sell Taiwan the large and profitable arms package which includes the
Aegis II missile system.
The longstanding Bush family connections with defense contractors who
would profit handsomely by this sale should also not be underestimated
vis-a-vis the creation of this current incident. Regarding the yet
unidentified extra personnel on the aircraft -- could they in fact be
electronics experts who were there to help the Chinese dismantle the
technology?
The key system the Chinese want from this aircraft is called SCSS,
Story Classic Surveillance System. It is the most sophisticated electronics
surveillance and communications reception technology ever constructed.
It has the ability to intercept and decode transmissions.
It can locate the source of the transmissions and automatically
translate from any language into English. It can pick up computer
transmissions, telephone and fax transmission, and long wave transmissions
from submarines. In short, this device can intercept any electronics
communications generated anywhere on the planet, underneath the ocean, and
even in outer space. There has never been anything like it. It is estimated
to be 20 years ahead of any other similar technology.
The reason why Washington wasn't able to get this device to China
through the usual illicit means is that it is proprietary to the National
Security Agency. They're the ones who control these devices and they're the
ones who build these devices.
Its capabilities are truly fantastic -- simultaneous translation in
all languages from any intercepts -- underwater traffic, cable traffic,
email traffic, telephone traffic, and satellite traffic. And it can also
pinpoint the location of where the transmission originates.
The National Security Agency has been consistently opposed to the
Washington policy of covertly arming China. NSA does not have the same
vested interest that those in the shadows of the White House and the
Department of Defense have in arming China.
It must be remembered that the modus operandi is to rearm China and to
make China the bogeyman of the 21st century, so everybody can start making
money again. Essentially it's an effort to turn back the clock.
NSA does not have a vested interest in this because it doesn't need to
operate from a large covert infrastructure. It doesn't have to generate
illicit covert monies the way others do. It's not like the CIA or Department
of Defense. It is really a more technically oriented agency dealing in
electronics. It doesn't deal in a lot of field intelligence and the sales of
weapons and narcotics to produce illegal covert revenue streams pursuant to
the sustenance of illegal illicit or surreptitious State policy. It is more
of a technical adjunct and therefore the NSA doesn't have this vested
interest.
The SCSS is proprietary technology built by the NSA. It's built by a
shadowy electronics company known as Vtek Industries, which is secretly
controlled by the NSA. It's so tightly controlled that the DoD and others in
Washington haven't been able to get their hands on it.
This SCSS system is also the same system used in the NSA Westar 7
satellite, which has the ability to monitor all telephone communications on
earth. Unlike the Echelon system, which is an invasive system, the SCSS is a
passive intelligence gathering system.
The Chinese F8 fighters, which supposedly forced the Aries II to land,
are knock-offs of early MIG-21 jets from about 1961.
The US Government is saying that the two Chinese F8 fighters were on
"routine patrol"(you could ask -- how do they know that?) and one of them
collided with the EP-3E.
They're not mentioning the fact that the Chinese actually scrambled
the aircraft out of their airbase on Hainan Island to intercept the Aries
II, even though the aircraft was over international waters.
The electronic countermeasure capability of this aircraft is so
advanced and the Chinese ECCM (electronic counter-counter measure) is so
antiquated that it is in fact possible that the only way the Chinese
aircraft could do anything would be to ram the US aircraft..
The Aries II ECM capability would have completely fried out the fire
and control mechanisms of the F8. They couldn't have fired. They couldn't
have locked on the radar and target imaging system. The only thing they
could have done to be a threat is to have rammed the aircraft.
That part of the story has plausibility, but now they're saying the
contact was accidental.
How do you make "accidental" contact with weather conditions of a
brilliant clear sky and unlimited ceiling?
They would have visually seen it from a long way off, since it's a
large aircraft.
The other explanation is that the Chinese aircraft was letting the
Aries II know that if they didn't fly to Hainan Island that the Chinese
pilots were prepared to sacrifice their lives and ram the plane. In other
words, "your ECM technology may have fried our fire and control mechanism
and our target imaging system but we will still ram you."
The Chinese pilots didn't have the bigger picture. They were scrambled
out on a mission and sent after this aircraft with the instructions to force
this aircraft to land on Chinese territory by any means necessary.
It's also unlikely that the Navy personnel on the Aries II knew the
reasons. It's probably only the shadowy unidentified non-Navy extra
personnel who knew what was going on. Therefore the Navy personnel didn't
really have any choice. It was either fly the plane to Chinese territory --
or get rammed.
These are the issues the US Government is dancing around. And just
like the Hanssen case, the more the government talks about this incident,
the more they contradict what they said before.
First they said there were 24 people on the aircraft. Then when
everyone noticed the aircraft complement of people was less, they said there
were additional non-Navy personnel, which they weren't prepared to identify.
Then suddenly the F8s were on patrol. Then they admitted that they were
scrambled out. Then they said, the plane had to make an emergency landing.
The Department of Defense briefing stated that the plane was in
"severe distress" and "They were going down and they had to make an
emergency landing" when they were able to fly an additional 76 miles.
This always happens because you've got the State Dept issuing press
releases. You've got Defense issuing press releases. The Navy is issuing
press releases. And as always in government, they don't coordinate the lies.
Everyone has different agendas, and consequently there isn't any
cooperation for the LCC. The LCC (Lie Coordination Committee) function
doesn't work And this really exists. Usually it comprises one of the Deputy
Assistant Secretaries of each agency in the cabinet.
The problem is when there are so many turf battles and cases of
inter-agency rivalry, these agencies have different agendas and the normal
Lie Coordination function doesn't work.
Most recently, the Navy has issued another contradicting statement --
that contrary to public knowledge, the aircraft was not fitted with an
explosive self-destruct mechanism.
The Navy spokesman actually said that the self-destruct mechanism in
the aircraft consisted in having a hammer at every operating station. Every
operating station comes with its own emergency hammer that's built into it.
The instructions on the hammer state that if there's any chance that
the plane will fall into hostile hands, the station operator is instructed
to "take the hammer and beat the ever loving piss out of this piece of
equipment."
In fact the Department of Defense issued a statement that as the plane
was being escorted to Chinese territory, the crew was supposed to be taking
their hammers and beating the piss out of their stations. Why did the
aircraft personnel wait until the aircraft was on the ground before
attempting to destroy the equipment, while armed Chinese troops were
entering the aircraft?
The DoD has repeatedly stated the level of technology is so advanced
that if it were to fall into hostile hands, it would seriously impact US
offensive military capabilities for a decade. Therefore, either the
Department of Defense is over-hyping this equipment. Or someone in
Washington wanted this equipment to be in Chinese hands. There is no other
explanation.
And here's the ludicrous context of this ludicrous story.
With the most secret electronics surveillance system in existence -
for which crews are supposed to become expendable, before the equipment
falls into enemy hands, the only self-destruct mechanism, according to the
Department of Defense, is a spare hammer with the instructions on the label
"to beat the ever loving piss out of it."
This is not your ordinary hammer, but a "special" Department of
Defense hammer, which undoubtedly cost the American taxpayer $600.
But the real operating protocol for the emergency procedures of the
Aries II -- if there is any possibility that the aircraft should become
involved in a situation wherein said technology may fall into hostile
hands -- the crew becomes completely expendable.
They are to undertake whatever measures are necessary to prevent this
equipment from falling into hostile hands. In other words, the technology on
this aircraft is so sophisticated that it is CL-1 (Compartmentalized Level
1) technology, the highest possible classification that exists.
The people who fly the Aries II surveillance aircraft equipped with
this technology are essentially operating on a wartime protocol, while
flying parallel to the coast of a hostile nation. They must counter any
threat to this technology by its destruction.
If the Department of Defense claims that the aircraft doesn't have an
explosive self- destruct mechanism, the question remains - why didn't they
just let the plane go into the ocean?
The crew's lives are immediately expendable upon threat, which means
that they are to expend their lives to prevent the technology and equipment
in question from falling into hostile hands. So why is the crew still alive?
And why is the aircraft still intact?


--=====================_59061560==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"


Al Martin Raw: Criminal Govt Conspiracy - Behind the Scenes

Behind the scenes in the beltway 

http://www.almartinraw.com/column12.html

by Al Martin

Aries II Down: Another Technology Transfer to China

In the continuing effort to make China the bogeyman of the 21st 

century, Washington has scored yet another coup - the loss of the EP-3E


Aries II surveillance aircraft.

It's very reminiscent of the phony FBI Hanssen Spy Case. In other 

words, what the US Government is saying just doesn't jibe with the
facts.

The implausible government story states that the Aries II aircraft was


supposedly escorted by ancient Chinese F8 fighter planes to a Chinese


military base at Hainan Island.

The Aries II has an electronic counter-measure capability that could


completely fry the electronic components of a state-of-the-art MIG 29,
let 

alone a vintage Chinese F-8. Its defensive capability consists of highly


advanced directional microwave weaponry.

Also this US Navy aircraft uses technology that is proprietary to the


National Security Agency. Most of the technology on the aircraft is 


electronic intercept in nature.

According to Department of Defense statements, all protocols were 

broken. This indicates that the incident has been staged to create a


deliberate transfer of this technology. This technology is so advanced
that 

even the NSA was queasy about giving it to the Chinese.

Since this technology is not proprietary to the Department of Defense


and since the NSA directly controls the contractors who produce this


equipment, there wasn't any way for those who are in favor of
transferring 

this technology to China, as a matter of illegal covert State policy, to


effect this transfer without staging an international incident. Therefore
an 

incident had to be created to give the Chinese this technology.

Whoever was in charge of the aircraft command must have been in on it.


Otherwise they would not have had the authority to circumvent the
protocols, 

unless directly ordered to do so. The aircraft then would either be in


pieces and the crew would be floating in life rafts. Or they would all be


dead.

By the way, the military designation of the EP-3E Aries II aircraft is


high enough that all crew members carry cyanide capsules. They must not
fall 

into enemy hands for interrogation. And that is precisely where they are
at 

this moment.

The Department of Defense claims they know nothing -- another bogus 


claim, since throughout the inside of the aircraft, there is a discreet


video system which continues to broadcast.

The Defense Department is also trying to imply that the Chinese are 


jamming the signals, but what they're not saying is that the Chinese
don't 

have the technological capability to jam these signals. These are highly


advanced microburst transmissions that can even be bounced off of China's


own satellites. The Chinese would not even be aware of it. Russian and


Chinese equipment cannot even detect such complex microburst
transmissions.

The protocol on this aircraft is very simple. If there was any chance


that the aircraft could fall into hostile hands, the crew is deemed to be


completely expendable. The protocol can only be overridden by the
President 

of the United States.

The only logical conclusion about this incident is that it is simply


an ongoing transfer of sophisticated technology to the Chinese
military.

First, the government had admitted that there were 24 personnel on the


aircraft the "majority of which were US Navy personnel." The
aircraft's has 

19 operating stations, Who are the non-Navy personnel, which the
government 

refuses to identify?

Second, why did the crew not execute its emergency protocol and 

destroy the aircraft?

The media is reporting that the crew is supposed to destroy the 

technology by any means necessary. What they're not saying is that the


aircraft has a self-destruct mechanism already built in. It could have
been 

completely destroyed.

If it appears that the aircraft is about to fall into "hostile"
hands, 

the normal protocol is that the self-destruct mechanism is supposed to be


activated. If the aircraft is over international waters, they are
supposed 

to actually ditch the plane and land on the water. The aircraft is built,
so 

it can make an emergency water landing.

Since the Aries II is a naval aircraft, it is built to stay afloat 

long enough for the crew to get out and the life rafts to automatically


inflate. The aircraft also carries emergency survival equipment with an


EBIRB, an emergency locating system.

The protocol then would have been to either destroy the plane or land


on the water, in which case, had the emergency self-destruct mechanism
been 

rendered inoperable for any reasons, as the plane began to sink, the


emergency self-destruct mechanism would have been activated automatically


when sea water came into contact with the amitol derivative explosives in


the mechanism. Amitol automatically explodes when sufficiently saturated
by 

seawater.

Even if the self-destruct mechanism had been rendered inoperable, as


the aircraft sank into the ocean and filled with seawater, it would have


automatically detonated. The question remains - why weren't these
protocols 

followed?

If the plane was able to travel an additional 76 miles and land on 

hostile territory, why couldn't it have flown to Vietnamese territorial


waters? The US Government claims that the plane was "severely
damaged" and 

had to make an emergency landing.

How "severely damaged" could the plane have been and still have
flown 

76 miles to make a landing at a Chinese air force base?

The aircraft had to fly north when it could have simply turned west.


Since it was less than 76 miles from Vietnamese territorial waters, there


would have been no threat there given the extremely hostile relationship


between Vietnam and China regarding territorial disputes in that
region.

One could almost say that the reason the protocol was not invoked was


because China was not considered a "hostile" country.

The "coincidental" nature of this international incident also
plays 

into the hands of the Republican right and the defense contractors
clamoring 

to sell Taiwan the large and profitable arms package which includes the


Aegis II missile system.

The longstanding Bush family connections with defense contractors who


would profit handsomely by this sale should also not be underestimated


vis-a-vis the creation of this current incident. Regarding the yet 

unidentified extra personnel on the aircraft -- could they in fact be


electronics experts who were there to help the Chinese dismantle the


technology?

The key system the Chinese want from this aircraft is called SCSS, 

Story Classic Surveillance System. It is the most sophisticated
electronics 

surveillance and communications reception technology ever
constructed.

It has the ability to intercept and decode transmissions.

It can locate the source of the transmissions and automatically 

translate from any language into English. It can pick up computer 

transmissions, telephone and fax transmission, and long wave
transmissions 

from submarines. In short, this device can intercept any electronics


communications generated anywhere on the planet, underneath the ocean,
and 

even in outer space. There has never been anything like it. It is
estimated 

to be 20 years ahead of any other similar technology.

The reason why Washington wasn't able to get this device to China 

through the usual illicit means is that it is proprietary to the National


Security Agency. They're the ones who control these devices and they're
the 

ones who build these devices.

Its capabilities are truly fantastic -- simultaneous translation in 


all languages from any intercepts -- underwater traffic, cable traffic,


email traffic, telephone traffic, and satellite traffic. And it can also


pinpoint the location of where the transmission originates.

The National Security Agency has been consistently opposed to the 

Washington policy of covertly arming China. NSA does not have the same


vested interest that those in the shadows of the White House and the


Department of Defense have in arming China.

It must be remembered that the modus operandi is to rearm China and to


make China the bogeyman of the 21st century, so everybody can start
making 

money again. Essentially it's an effort to turn back the clock.

NSA does not have a vested interest in this because it doesn't need to


operate from a large covert infrastructure. It doesn't have to generate


illicit covert monies the way others do. It's not like the CIA or
Department 

of Defense. It is really a more technically oriented agency dealing in


electronics. It doesn't deal in a lot of field intelligence and the sales
of 

weapons and narcotics to produce illegal covert revenue streams pursuant
to 

the sustenance of illegal illicit or surreptitious State policy. It is
more 

of a technical adjunct and therefore the NSA doesn't have this vested


interest.

The SCSS is proprietary technology built by the NSA. It's built by a


shadowy electronics company known as Vtek Industries, which is secretly


controlled by the NSA. It's so tightly controlled that the DoD and others
in 

Washington haven't been able to get their hands on it.

This SCSS system is also the same system used in the NSA Westar 7 

satellite, which has the ability to monitor all telephone communications
on 

earth. Unlike the Echelon system, which is an invasive system, the SCSS
is a 

passive intelligence gathering system.

The Chinese F8 fighters, which supposedly forced the Aries II to land,


are knock-offs of early MIG-21 jets from about 1961.

The US Government is saying that the two Chinese F8 fighters were on


"routine patrol"(you could ask -- how do they know that?) and
one of them 

collided with the EP-3E.

They're not mentioning the fact that the Chinese actually scrambled 


the aircraft out of their airbase on Hainan Island to intercept the Aries


II, even though the aircraft was over international waters.

The electronic countermeasure capability of this aircraft is so 

advanced and the Chinese ECCM (electronic counter-counter measure) is so


antiquated that it is in fact possible that the only way the Chinese


aircraft could do anything would be to ram the US aircraft..

The Aries II ECM capability would have completely fried out the fire


and control mechanisms of the F8. They couldn't have fired. They couldn't


have locked on the radar and target imaging system. The only thing they


could have done to be a threat is to have rammed the aircraft.

That part of the story has plausibility, but now they're saying the 


contact was accidental.

How do you make "accidental" contact with weather conditions of
a 

brilliant clear sky and unlimited ceiling?

They would have visually seen it from a long way off, since it's a 

large aircraft.

The other explanation is that the Chinese aircraft was letting the 

Aries II know that if they didn't fly to Hainan Island that the Chinese


pilots were prepared to sacrifice their lives and ram the plane. In other


words, "your ECM technology may have fried our fire and control
mechanism 

and our target imaging system but we will still ram you."

The Chinese pilots didn't have the bigger picture. They were scrambled


out on a mission and sent after this aircraft with the instructions to
force 

this aircraft to land on Chinese territory by any means necessary.

It's also unlikely that the Navy personnel on the Aries II knew the 


reasons. It's probably only the shadowy unidentified non-Navy extra 


personnel who knew what was going on. Therefore the Navy personnel didn't


really have any choice. It was either fly the plane to Chinese territory
-- 

or get rammed.

These are the issues the US Government is dancing around. And just 

like the Hanssen case, the more the government talks about this incident,


the more they contradict what they said before.

First they said there were 24 people on the aircraft. Then when 

everyone noticed the aircraft complement of people was less, they said
there 

were additional non-Navy personnel, which they weren't prepared to
identify. 

Then suddenly the F8s were on patrol. Then they admitted that they were


scrambled out. Then they said, the plane had to make an emergency
landing.

The Department of Defense briefing stated that the plane was in 

"severe distress" and "They were going down and they had
to make an 

emergency landing" when they were able to fly an additional 76
miles.

This always happens because you've got the State Dept issuing press 


releases. You've got Defense issuing press releases. The Navy is issuing


press releases. And as always in government, they don't coordinate the
lies.

Everyone has different agendas, and consequently there isn't any 

cooperation for the LCC. The LCC (Lie Coordination Committee) function


doesn't work And this really exists. Usually it comprises one of the
Deputy 

Assistant Secretaries of each agency in the cabinet.

The problem is when there are so many turf battles and cases of 

inter-agency rivalry, these agencies have different agendas and the
normal 

Lie Coordination function doesn't work.

Most recently, the Navy has issued another contradicting statement --


that contrary to public knowledge, the aircraft was not fitted with an


explosive self-destruct mechanism.

The Navy spokesman actually said that the self-destruct mechanism in


the aircraft consisted in having a hammer at every operating station.
Every 

operating station comes with its own emergency hammer that's built into
it.

The instructions on the hammer state that if there's any chance that


the plane will fall into hostile hands, the station operator is
instructed 

to "take the hammer and beat the ever loving piss out of this piece
of 

equipment."

In fact the Department of Defense issued a statement that as the plane


was being escorted to Chinese territory, the crew was supposed to be
taking 

their hammers and beating the piss out of their stations. Why did the


aircraft personnel wait until the aircraft was on the ground before 


attempting to destroy the equipment, while armed Chinese troops were


entering the aircraft?

The DoD has repeatedly stated the level of technology is so advanced


that if it were to fall into hostile hands, it would seriously impact US


offensive military capabilities for a decade. Therefore, either the 


Department of Defense is over-hyping this equipment. Or someone in 

Washington wanted this equipment to be in Chinese hands. There is no
other 

explanation.

And here's the ludicrous context of this ludicrous story.

With the most secret electronics surveillance system in existence - 


for which crews are supposed to become expendable, before the equipment


falls into enemy hands, the only self-destruct mechanism, according to
the 

Department of Defense, is a spare hammer with the instructions on the
label 

"to beat the ever loving piss out of it."

This is not your ordinary hammer, but a "special" Department of


Defense hammer, which undoubtedly cost the American taxpayer $600.

But the real operating protocol for the emergency procedures of the 


Aries II -- if there is any possibility that the aircraft should become


involved in a situation wherein said technology may fall into hostile


hands -- the crew becomes completely expendable.

They are to undertake whatever measures are necessary to prevent this


equipment from falling into hostile hands. In other words, the technology
on 

this aircraft is so sophisticated that it is CL-1 (Compartmentalized
Level 

1) technology, the highest possible classification that exists.

The people who fly the Aries II surveillance aircraft equipped with 


this technology are essentially operating on a wartime protocol, while


flying parallel to the coast of a hostile nation. They must counter any


threat to this technology by its destruction.

If the Department of Defense claims that the aircraft doesn't have an


explosive self- destruct mechanism, the question remains - why didn't
they 

just let the plane go into the ocean?

The crew's lives are immediately expendable upon threat, which means


that they are to expend their lives to prevent the technology and
equipment 

in question from falling into hostile hands. So why is the crew still
alive?

And why is the aircraft still intact?





--=====================_59061560==_.ALT--

_______________________________________________
Illusions mailing list
Illusions@beyond-the-illusion.com
http://www.beyond-the-illusion.com/mailman/listinfo/illusions