From: econews@ecologynews.com
Subject: IUFO: CWM-Clandestine Weather Modification
Date: 4 Mar 2001 13:39:24 -0500
To: iufo@topica.com

->  IUFO  Mailing List

CWM - Clandestine Weather Modification 
                                                             

  Hi All - The Seattle-Vancouver earthquake seems to be one of those 
  events which trigger integrative commentary on the role of EM and 
PSYOPS   in earth and climatic change. FYI - Below is a very interesting 
piece   on CWM (Clandestine Weather Modification)we received from Dick 
Eastman. 
  Thanks for reading it - Alfred Webre, Vancouver, BC

  =====
  Subject:         Re: ENVIRONMENTAL WAR & GLOBAL CLIMATE
  Date sent:       Sun, 4 Mar 2001 01:40:36 -0800

  Like the weather and the oceans, the mantle beneith the
  floating tectonic plates also involve convection cells, but
  in a plastic medium that sets up wave patterns that may
  may be modified by superimposition of additional waves.

  It is that fact that makes the following interesting:

  ENVIRONMENTAL WAR & GLOBAL EARTHQUAKES
   

   Have not seen the book referenced below, but could the
   abnormal activity on 3.39 MHz February 20 and prior be
   linked to the Seattle quake? If so, why would HAARP
   (supposedly funded by U.S. sources) be used to create quakes
   or other assorted EM mayhem on U.S. property? I picked up a
   signal so strong it went right off the S meter on my SW set
   at that frequency at 6:00 am on Feb 20th. Took an audio
   sampling of half an hour but can't make hide or hair of what
   HAARP is broadcasting, just that it's STRONG. 


  Answer: HAARP is operated by the unaccountable secret
  organizations, a group that long ago made its own peace with
  the enemy and today merely carries on the charade of
  protecting the U.S. For example, the CIA, Mossad and the
  Peoples Liberation Army together act as one giant transnational
  corporation and NGO in a host of secret "research" ventures, including
  weather modification and other geophyscial science. But this
  alliance also has a mercenary side to it as well (see article on
  weather modification, following the book notice, below).

   
   econ-@ecologynews.com wrote: 


   
   EARTH CHANGES: ENVIRONMENTAL WAR & GLOBAL EARTHQUAKES

   VANCOUVER, BC - In the aftermath of the Seattle, WA
   earthquake of 28 February 2001, Universebooks.com is
   immediately releasing a review pre-publication version of
   its new eBook on Environmental War and Global Earthquakes.
   You can now read a review copy of the challenging new eBook
   EARTH CHANGES (Universebooks.com) at:
   http://www.universebooks.com/earthchanges.html
   EARTH CHANGES explores the disciplines of catastrophic
   geology, seismology, vulcanology, parapsychology, and public
   interest policy analysis. Author Alfred Lambremont Webre
   develops a new field theory explaining how an age of global
   earthquakes might be fulfilled -- not by earth system
   mechanics, but by the deployment of a new generation of
   electromagnetic weapons, used in environmental warfare.

   Electromagnetic (EM) weapons are a possible trigger of
   cataclysmic earth events. EM fields can superheat the
   ionosphere, devastating magnetic bands around the earth, and
   in turn causing massive disruption of the earth's Tectonic
   plates. A January 17, 1995 earthquake in Kobe, Japan may
   have been triggered by clandestine deployment of EM weapons.
   EM strategic warfare includes weather, climate and earth
   event warfare. Researchers have reported the use of EM
   weapons in anti-population mind-control operations over
   major cities.
   .......
   Author Alfred Webre, a Yale Law School graduate, is a former
   member of the Governor's Emergency Task Force on Earthquake
   Preparedness, State of California, and author of the classic
   work on Earth Changes, THE AGE OF CATACLYSM (G.P. Putnam's
   Sons 1974).
   CONTACT: Geri DeStefano, PhD, edi-@universebooks.com
   EcoNews Service
   http://www.ecologynews.com 

  ------------------------------------
  In an envrionment of government
  secrecy the citizen must use the
  methods of science to uncover
  abuse and hold officials accountable.
  Sufficient evidence has accumulated
  to justify the suspicion that
  cloud-generation technologies are
  being used to redirect, attenuate
  and intensify the natural course
  of meteorological and oceanographical
  events by changing lower-atmosphere
  pressure (air density)-- what the
  public is begining to call clandestine
  weather modification.


  An ezboard web resource for
  interdisciplinary investigation
  of the possibility of clandestine
  weather modification has just been
  created. People are invited to post
  anything there which they deem
  relevant to

  1) interpreting the observations
  and documents that have
  occasioned the CWM explanation;

  2) evaluating soundness of the
  science that is being
  attributed to CWM; or

  3) refuting or supporting the
  necessary implications of CWM
  if it is taking place.



  The following essay presents one
  first-hand observer's grounds for
  suspicion that chemtrails are
  clandestine weather modification
  in action.

  Dick Eastman
  ---------------------

  Numerous worldwide "chemtrail"
  reports ( for examples, see www.carnicom.com/contrails.htm,
  www.chemtrailcentral.com ,
  and www.rense.com ) support no
  other explanation than that
  large-scale operations are
  underway that are modifying
  the atmosphere with "treatment"
  that only the most causal or
  short-term observer might mistake
  for the ordinary vapor-trail
  condensation of jet aircraft
  or natural cloud cover.

  And when concerned citizens
  bring this abnormality, so
  obviously filling the sky,
  to the attention of appropriate
  authorities, including the
  Environmental Protection
  Agency -- a bureaucracy often
  so direct and aggressive in
  investigating all leads
  on infractions of air-quality
  regulations -- we quickly learn
  that our government is neither
  anxious to impound airplanes
  and levy fines, nor willing to
  ease growing public confusion
  and fear concerning what
  is being done to our atmosphere
  and why.

  The time has come to subject
  the following as-yet-unrefuted
  but also under-tested thesis
  to every possible criticism and
  test that disinterested research
  can bring to bear.

  The Clandestine Weather
  Modification Thesis:

  Since at least 1992 major
  weather events have been
  shaped by the application
  of technologies that
  alternately heat or cool
  precise parcels of
  the lower atmosphere,
  thereby decreasing or
  increasing, respectively,
  the density of those
  parcels, in order to alter
  the pressure-system
  dynamics that otherwise
  would naturally obtain;
  this being a means of
  governing the movement
  of heat and moisture
  within the atmosphere, but
  also of redirecting
  wind-pushed currents of warm
  or cool water near the surface
  of the seas -- the
  interaction of marine and
  atmospheric events both
  monitored and anticipated
  by real-time sensors,
  signal-processing, and
  intervention hardware.

  Let us consider the two
  distinct sets of technologies
  that give Clandestine Weather
  Modification its directive
  "push" and "pull" capabilities,
  technologies involving the
  generation of cloud, using
  aircraft, and the dissipation
  of cloud, using remote high-
  energy radio-energy generating
  stations respectively.

  How "Chemtrail" Cloud "Pushes"
  Weather Systems

  If CWM is real, then the
  non-dissipating cloud-cover-creating contrails/chemtrails terrifying
  the observant are most-likely
  being deployed to reduce the
  amount of solar energy
  reaching precisely determined
  patches of the earth's survace,
  land or ocean, in order
  to effect lower-than-otherwise
  surface temperatures and,
  concomitantly, higher-than-otherwise
  barometric pressure in the
  troposphere, or lower atmosphere,
  immediately above the patch.

  (Consider a pan on a stove
  with water heated a-little-short
  of the boiling point. The heat
  at the bottom of the pan sets
  up convection currents,and thus
  a circulating "weather" system
  is created in the fluid medium.
  But if only half of the pan's
  bottom surface is heated, the
  pattern of circulation will
  change in complex, but not
  wholly chaotic (unpredictable)
  ways. It is to effect this kind
  of dynamic pattern change that
  carefully calculated loci of
  chemtrailed cloud sunblock are
  introduced in the thermally driven
  atmosphere. In this way chemtrailing
  redirects air-current flows, speeds
  or slows them, or detains them in
  places so the air can gain or loose
  heat and moisture. And when
  chemtrailing of cloud is done over
  the sea, the same principle
  results in a change in the winds
  that push surface waters --a result
  that puts the immense heat-energy
  reservoir of the tropical seas at
  the disposal of the weather modifiers,
  giving them the capability of
  steering great parcels of warm or
  cooler sea water from one
  geographical region to another
  -- an action fertile in catastrophic
  consequences of terrifying variety.

  How Applied Radio Physics
  "Pulls" Weather Systems

  A second meteorological mystery
  that the clandestine weather
  modification thesis explains is
  the sudden -- almost instantaneous--
  disappearance of cloud before the
  eyes of amazed onlookers.

  This feat is the work of a second
  technology, one that yields an
  effect the opposite of that
  caused by chemtrailing, i.e,
  it eliminates high-altitude cloud
  in order to allow more of the sun's
  radiant energy to warm a targeted
  patch of earth surface more than
  would occur without this
  intervention. This cloud-busting-
  effected heating of patches of
  surface decreases the density of
  the air immediately above the
  patch, causing that air to rise,
  thereby creating a low-pressure
  cell that will pull in (as wind)
  higher-pressure air adjacent
  to the patch. (This is like
  adding extra heat to just
  one small spot on the bottom of
  a pan of water to affect
  convection patterning.

  To gain a better grasp of the
  physics involved, get a wide
  cake pan, two or three candles,
  some liquid food coloring and
  some candle holders. Place the
  pan of water over an arrangement
  of lit candles, then drop in
  some of the food coloring
  so that you can follow the
  circulation of water in the
  fluid "atmosphere." Change
  the relative locations of
  the candle-heated spots and
  see how the convective
  flow patterns change.)

  Few meteorologists are familiar
  with the story of Dr. Florence W.
  van Straten and her discovery of
  "cloud breaking."

  Differential heating of parcels of
  air to quickly dissipate natural
  cloud accumulation is a process
  pioneered in the late 1940's by
  Dr. van Straten, then a Navy
  meteorologist. Van Straten hit
  upon the idea of using blowing
  carbon black (i.e., soot) into the
  atmosphere through a section of
  stovepipe sticking out the opened
  door of modified Superconstellation
  "Hurricane Hunter." Carbon
  black admits almost no light and
  is more than 99 percent efficient in
  capturing every bit of light energy
  falling upon it.Van Straten knew
  that theoretically "a pound of
  very finely divided carbon
  scattered in the bright sunshine
  picks up enough energy each
  minute to raise the temperature
  of eleven tons of water from
  the freezing point to the
  boiling point." And even within
  a cloud, there is still enough
  light reflected from water
  droplets and hitting the carbon
  particles from all sides to
  heat the cloud sufficiently to
  undo vapor condensation.
  In the very first experiment,
  when a one-pound dose of carbon
  was ejected into a cloud
  formation growing from a base
  of about 2,500 to a top at about
  11,000 feet ("with crisp and
  sharp edges and turrets looking
  like boiling cauldrons, stretching
  upward another thousand
  feet or so") the carbon took
  a few minutes to warm, but then
  the results became dramatic,
  as recorded from several
  photo-reconnaissance planes
  monitoring the experiment.
  Multiple motion pictures from
  different altitudes show
  "that after several minutes
  during which nothing happened,
  the cloud suddenly spurted upward
  from a point just above our
  flight level. A tunnel formed
  where we had flown though the
  cloud, opening and widening
  rapidly until the cloud was
  sliced in two. The upper section
  darted up several thousand feet,
  becoming very wispy and
  transparent. Moments after
  its push upwards, it thinned out
  and was gone. Almost
  simultaneously, the bottom
  half of the cloud turned very
  dark and, as though a giant had
  wiped a sponge over a slate,
  it, too, disappeared. The
  observers were unanimous in
  testifying that there was
  nothing gradual about the process.
  'Now you see it. Now you don,t,'
  the pilot of a jet plane flying
  toward the cloud reported."
  So regardless of its presence
  or absence in current journals,
  technology for removal of
  sun-blocking atmospheric cloud
  by increasing its interior
  temperature has been established
  by the most unassailable
  criterion; it has been done.

  (Perhaps not irrelevant is the
  fact that van Straten was
  immediately reassigned and
  her project terminated
  when the first progress report
  of this revolutionary experiment
  (including even more impressive
  replications) reached the Pentagon;
  "I was forced to return to
  Washington because I was needed (?)
  and the planes were needed elsewhere...
  (yet) I was sure I had a tool for
  performing significant work in
  weather modification."
  (Note: The question mark in the
  preceding sentence is van Straten's.)
  Source: Florence W. van Straten,
  Weather or Not, (New York:
  Dodd & Mead, 1966), chapter 12,
  "Making and Breaking Clouds."

  Clandestine Weather Modification
  of course does not rely on
  broadcasting soot to heat cloud.
  Advanced radio physics has
  yielded a technology that
  permits high-frequency
  high-energy waves to be
  projected to the ionosphere
  which in turn serves to reflect
  and focus excited (heated)
  electrons and ions onto
  30-mile-diameter targets
  thousands of miles from the
  transmission point. This
  means of heating objects
  from a distance gives CWM
  its weather-system "pull"
  in two ways:

  1) By heating cloud enough
  for cloud dissipation to occur,
  thereby permitting more of
  the sun's radiation to reach
  and heat targeted earth-surface
  patches; and

  2) By heating those land
  and sea-surface patches (and
  maybe the molecules and ions
  of the unclouded lower
  atmosphere itself) directly
  with high-energy particle
  streams focused down through
  an already cloudless upper
  atmosphere. (Note: this second
  technique requires much more
  transmission energy to achieve
  a given amount of CWM pull, as it
  does not rely on the sun to do
  the additional "the heavy
  lifting." (It should also be
  remarked that the vast amounts
  of electrical power this
  techology requires can, in fact,
  easily be supplied in abundance
  by tapping natural gas at oil
  wells of Alaska's North Slope.
  In fact,Defense Advanced Research
  Projects Agency has long held a
  patent that includes the design
  of a 40-mile-square transmitter
  for ionospheric bombardment
  utilizing that very source.

  The problem of
  signal processing.

  Data collection, data processing,
  and the faster-than-real-time
  modeling-for-prediction of nonlinear dynamical systems (where small
  changes in initial conditions can
  have incalculably divergent effects
  if the "corrective interventions
  cannot be calculated and applied
  fast enough are not a problem for
  CWM given present known
  scientific capabilities.

  Often presented as insurmountable
  obstacles for weather modification,
  the barriers imposed by tendencies
  toward fundamental unpredictabilty
  in systems of organized complexity
  only exist if one is attempting to
  change weather too far in the future
  using only one single intervention
  applied at time t = 0. Clandestine
  weather modification, in order to
  work at all, i.e., in order to
  beat the tendency of nonlinear
  dynamic systems to chaotic pattern
  divergence, must utilize continuous
  feedback and correction, and this
  is exactly what existing weather
  monitoring instrumentalities and
  high-speed computers and software
  have been capable of doing at
  least since 1992.

  Sociological, Political and
  Economic Considerations


  People in authority within the
  United States Government and
  various powerful non-governmental
  organizations (NGOs) during
  the course of World War II and
  the Cold War have gained
  managerial control over secret,
  originally defense-related
  applied technologies, including
  -- as the increasingly complete
  historical record now shows --
  technologies that afford practical
  control of discrete weather events
  --as the experience of Florence
  W. van Straten and the fate of
  the great weather-modification
  breakthrough -- what should have
  been the triumph of her career --
  described above, vividly
  demonstrates.

  Unfortunately it is in the
  nature of secrecy in
  organizations that those
  bureaucrats and those CEO's
  of NGOs who control events
  through officially secret
  means, soon come under strong
  temptation to employ their
  clandestine power to
  affect economic markets for
  the benefit of their own,
  i.e., for the people who
  enjoy the privilege of
  privately networking "inside"
  systems of governance, people
  accountable to no one but
  themselves. It is for such
  as these that the existence
  of a secret defense technology
  for controlling weather would
  present a great "moral hazzard,"
  a temptation to help one's
  family and friends to make a
  lot of money from exclusive
  knowledge and control of
  future weather events.


  Weather is the most powerful
  and volatile variable in the
  human food-supply system, and
  as a consequence of this, in
  the fluctuations of the
  commodities and futures
  markets worldwide.

  Weather disasters involve
  billions of dollars in emergency
  funds, recovery loans,
  and reconstruction investment.
  Insurance companies are depleted
  of capital, marginalizing
  them as competition for other
  big players in the financial
  markets --cut in their supply
  of loanable funds amounting
  billions worldwide in the course
  of the super-weather-disaster-
  ridden 1990's.

  Nor should we overlook the
  suspicious new
  "weather derivative" created
  in recent years, a financial
  instrument that permits big
  finance to package and sell
  risk-management "bets" on what
  buyers assume to be crap-shoot
  "acts of God" or of randomly
  bridled and unbridled "nature,"
  never suspecting that the
  "game" has been loaded
  by clandestine weather modification.
  (British financiers developed the
  first publically offered weather
  derivatives, by the way.)

  And finally there is the obvious
  contingency that giant Wall Street
  capitalized agribusiness is able to
  buy up thousands of acres of small
  family farms and Western ranches
  following economic distress and
  foreclosure of securitized first
  and second mortgages, when crops
  fail too many years in a row due
  to drought, flood, or even merely
  unseasonable "normal"
  weather onsets.

  In all of the above one should
  keep in mind the economic reality
  that, in an economic disaster,
  assets are not destroyed, they
  merely change hands.
  Bad weather ruins crops, but
  usually leaves the future
  usefulness of the land unaffected.
  What a hurricane destroys in
  one decade -- temporarily
  depressing real estate values,
  may, ten years later, be the
  jungle-lush site of
  multi-billion-dollar up-scale
  resorts owned by a consortium
  of global investors.

  In short, if one looks for a
  "bottom-line" incentive that
  would motivate development
  of a CWM system that can
  simultaneously cover larges
  fractions of continental
  and ocean surface with
  chemtrailed cloud and can
  utilize 40-square-mile
  transmitters that suck
  up tons of North Shore gas
  volume to bounce high
  energy off the ionosphere,
  be aware: more-than-
  ample economic stimulus
  exists to make it all
  worth while.

  There you have it
  -- the bare-bones CWM thesis.


  And when you do join this
  investigation, may you find the
  rest of us all discoursing in
  the spirit of John Stewart Mill
  when he wrote:

  "The only way in which a
  human being can make some
  approach to knowing the
  whole of a subject is by
  hearing what can be said
  about it by persons of
  every variety of
  opinion and studying
  all modes in which it
  can be looked
  at by every character
  of mind. No wise man
  ever acquired
  wisdom in any mode
  but this."

  Dick Eastman
  Yakima,Washington
  U.S.A.
  east-@wolfenet.com
  dickea-@nwinfo.net

  Every man is responsible to every other man. 

__________
EcoNews Service - Always online for Ecology, Consciousness & Universe 
Exopolitics.     Vancouver, BC V6M 1V8
EcoNews http://www.ecologynews.com/
Prague  http://mujweb.cz/www/ecologynews/ 
mailto:econews@ecologynews.com


-> To unsubscribe send email to iufo-unsubscribe@topica.com

____________________________________________________________
T O P I C A  -- Learn More. Surf Less. 
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose.
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01