From: woodrow anselen
Subject: RE: SNET: Fantasy - The Starlink Disaster
Date: 27 Feb 2001 22:50:52 -0500
To: snetnews@topica.com
-> SNETNEWS Mailing List
Thats a lot to read on an empty stomach
> [Original Message]
> From: Steve Wingate
> To: ; SNETNEWS ; IUFO
> Date: 2/27/01 7:54:44 PM
> Subject: SNET: Fantasy - The Starlink Disaster
>
> -> SNETNEWS Mailing List
>
> The GM Food Segregation
> (This is a very interesting article. --SW)
>
> Fantasy - The Starlink Disaster
>
http://www.purefood.org/gefood/genefoodseg.cfm
> 2-27-1
>
>
> Just about everybody ignored the safety
rules on a kind
> of biotech corn called Starlink. Luckily,
no one died from
> eating it. But what if someone had? by
Brian 0'Reilly
>
> For anyone in the business of growing corn,
one of the
> biggest frustrations of the job is a brown
inchworm-like
> creature that spends most of the summer and
fall
> munching and tunneling through the corn,
only to emerge
> as a moth that flies off to spawn a lot
more inchworms.
> Like many adolescents, corn borers can be
enormously
> destructive. Depending on when in the
growing season
> they arrive, they can damage arteries that
carry moisture
> to corn, or even cause the entire ear to
fall off before
> harvest. The borer costs American farmers
and their $20
> billion corn crop upwards of $1 billion a
year, if you count
> diminished yields plus the price of
pesticides and other
> measures needed to keep the borer at bay.
>
> So in 1995, when scientists produced an
early variety of
> genetically modified corn that poisoned the
borer shortly
> after its first cornstalk casserole,
farmers fairly jumped for
> joy. But last summer, right in the middle
of the harvest,
> things got messy. Plant Genetics Systems, a
company
> now owned by Aventis, a giant European
> pharmaceuticals firm, had developed another
> borer-killing gene that it called Starlink.
However, the
> toxin that Starlink produced in the corn
plant resembled a
> substance that triggers violent allergies
in some people.
> When federal regulators threatened to ban
Starlink corn
> until its safety in humans could be
established, the
> developers thought they had a better idea.
In effect, they
> promised to sell Starlink seed only to
farmers using it for
> feed corn; in turn, the farmers would agree
not to sell the
> seed to anyone who would put it in human
food. Okay,
> said the feds. But be careful.
>
> Well, guess what? Almost everybody involved
screwed
> up. Even though Starlink was on the market
for just three
> years-and made up just 0.5% of the 80
million acres of
> corn planted in the U.S. last year-it began
showing up in
> all sorts of places it didn't belong,
including tacos, corn
> chips, breweries, and muffin mix. The
promises made by
> Starlink's inventors proved worthless,
falling prey to
> managerial inattention, corporate mergers,
blind faith,
> misplaced hope, woeful ignorance, political
activism, and
> probably greedy farmers too, if you can
imagine such a
> thing.
>
> Any batch of core destined for human
consumption must
> now be ground up and tested for the
StarLink gene.
>
> The episode hardly qualifies as a disaster,
since no one
> seems to have gotten seriously ill from
eating Starlink
> corn. Howard Buffett, son of Warren and a
farmer near
> Decatur, Ill., even sees a bright side to
it; he says
> Starlink has revealed the shortcomings of
federal
> oversight and has pointed up the inability
of the
> grain-handling industry to segregate subtly
different
> products. Still, Starlink has caused no end
of hassles for
> farmers, grain-elevator operators,
railroads, and food
> processors. Neil Harl, an agricultural
economist at Iowa
> State University, calls it "the biggest
assault on American
> agriculture I have ever witnessed."
Altogether, the fiasco
> could cost Aventis half a billion dollars.
>
> The long-term consequences may be more
severe. So
> far Americans have been much more accepting
of
> genetically modified food than the rest of
the world. If
> Starlink triggers hysteria among Americans,
the world's
> biggest appetite for that promising
technology will shrink,
> and the whole science will be retarded for
years. If
> foreign food processors that buy U.S.
agricultural
> commodities worry that American grain glows
in the dark,
> they will turn even more to Brazil and
other countries for
> their food, and U.S. farm prices, already
depressed, will
> fall further.
>
> Harvest of Trouble Starlink seeds were
planted on just
> 350, 000 of America's 80 million acres of
com last year,
> mostly in the upper Midwest.
>
> 1-1,000 acres 1,001 - 10,000 acres 10,000 -
100,000
> acres Iowa: 135,000 acres
>
> One of the more surprising revelations of
the Starlink
> mess isn't that genetically modified food
h0as suddenly
> appeared in the food supply, but rather how
much such
> food is already out there. Most of us have
heard about
> such oddities as strawberries protected
from frost
> damage by a gene transplanted from an
arctic fish. But
> did you know that genetically modified
soybeans now
> account for 60% of all soy grown in the
U.S.? Called
> Roundup Ready, the plants were developed by
> Monsanto to tolerate Roundup, one of the
company's
> weed-killers. Says Gary Niery, a farmer in
central Illinois:
> "Before Roundup, we used to use a quart of
herbicide
> per acre. Now it's just ounces." Similarly
engineered soy
> plants, including LibertyLink from Aventis,
are sold by
> other companies.
>
> Close on the heels of Roundup Ready soy
came another
> kind of genetically altered plant: one that
produced its
> own pesticide. That's where the Starlink
story begins.
> For nearly 30 years farmers have sprayed
crops with
> solutions derived from a soil bacterium
called Bacillus
> thuringiensis. This so-called Bt spray is
harmless to
> humans but quite effective against a
variety of pests,
> including corn borers. However, it doesn't
kill all corn
> borers, especially those that often show up
in a second
> wave of infestation in midsummer. In 1995
seed
> companies such as Pioneer Hi-Bred and
DeKalb won
> approval to sell corn genetically altered
to produce the
> pesticide found in soil bacteria; this seed
killed nearly
> 99% of corn borers. About 18% of corn
planted in the
> U.S. last year was of the Bt variety.
>
> One bag of seed corn (enough to plant 2
acres) costs
> $90; Bt corn costs an additional $15 per
bag. Corn-borer
> infestations vary widely from year to year,
depending on
> wind and rain. If infestations are mild,
it's cheaper to fight
> the borer with sprays. But in broad swaths
of the
> Cornbelt where the borer is a chronic
problem, the Bt
> varieties of seed are more economical.
Roughly a quarter
> of the corn grown last year in Iowa,
Kansas, Nebraska,
> and Minnesota was of the Bt type; the
figure was 35% in
> South Dakota.
>
> Pioneer and DeKalb's head start in the
Btengineered
> crop business worried Aventis, a
$20billion-a-year
> French pharmaceuticals and agricultural
sciences
> company formed last year by the merger of
> Rhône-Poulenc and Hoechst. Although most of
Aventis'
> revenues come from drugs such as Allegra, a
> prescription antihistamine, the company's
crop-sciences
> division had sales of $4 billion last year,
making it one of
> the biggest agproducts operations in the
world. At least
> some Aventis officials had big hopes for
genetic
> engineering. "We were spending $450 million
a year on
> R&D in the agricultural division," says an
executive who,
> like all Aventis officials interviewed by
FORTUNE,
> declined to be identified. "We had gone
about as far as
> you could fighting weeds and pests with
chemicals and
> needed to make a big shift to
biotechnology." Even
> before their companies merged, executives at
> Rhone-Poulenc and Hoechst worried that
rivals were
> grabbing market share in key agricultural
technologies
> that would be difficult to win back later.
>
> Buried in the welter of corporate
subentities created by
> the RhônePoulenc/Hoechst combination was a
small
> Belgian company called Plant Genetics,
which Hoechst
> had acquired in 1996. Corporate life cannot
have been
> easy for the managers and scientists at
Plant Genetics,
> who had been working for a decade on a Bt
variety of
> corn. Four years before the Aventis merger,
Hoechst had
> formed a joint venture with Schering, the
U.S. drug
> company. Plant Genetics was acquired by the
joint
> venture, called Agrevo, which was later
folded again into
> a division of Aventis. The point here is
less the details
> than the big picture. There was lots of
upheaval at Plant
> Genetics-its tiny U.S. headquarters moved
through three
> cities in four years. It is reasonable to
assume, too, that
> operational details surrounding a corn gene
were hardly
> the most important concern of senior
Aventis executives
> trying to manage a $20 billion merger.
Until it was too
> late.
>
> Although scientists at Plant Genetics were
a few years
> behind the competition, they were excited
about what
> they had created: a variety of the Bt
protein that
> destroyed a different part of the corn
borer's gut. This
> was important because an additional
vulnerability would
> make it harder for the corn borer to
develop resistance to
> Bt pesticides. The Bt variety created in
Starlink corn was
> called Cry9. (Bt proteins have a
crystalline shape, so
> different varieties were called Cry1, Cry2,
etc.) Aventis
> scientists thought Cry9 was a winner that
would make
> them significant players in the next
generation of
> agricultural products. Federal regulators
in the U.S. were
> more cautious.
>
> David Witherspoon of Garst Seed Co. holds a
genetically
> altered seedling. Garst was the biggest
seller of Starlink.
>
> In the early 1980s, when the prospect of
bioengineered
> crops first emerged, people from numerous
U.S.
> government agencies met to discuss how to
regulate the
> products. They agreed that the Department
of Agriculture
> would determine whether a new plant was
safe to grow
> outdoors: Would it run amok, for example,
and harm
> other plants or animals? If a genetically
altered plant was
> supposed to produce a pesticide, the
Environmental
> Protection Agency would decide whether the
plant was
> safe in food. The Food and Drug
Administration would
> enforce the food safety standards
established by the
> EPA.
>
> In 1997, when EPA scientists were
evaluating Starlink,
> they saw something they hadn't seen in
other brands of
> Bt corn. Starlink's Cry9 protein didn't
dissolve in stomach
> acid as quickly as proteins in other Bt
varieties. Nor did it
> break down as rapidly during cooking or
processing. This
> meant that the Cry9 protein, unlike the
others, might stay
> in the stomach long enough to be passed
intact into the
> bloodstream, where it could trigger an
allergic reaction.
> "Other Bt proteins lasted only a few
seconds in simulated
> gastric juices," says Stephen Johnson,
deputy assistant
> administrator of the EPA in charge of
pesticide
> regulations. "This broke down much more
slowly." In
> other tests, however, the Cry9 protein
seemed fine. "We
> looked at the structure of the molecule and
asked if it
> walked and talked like other known
allergens," says
> Johnson. "It did not. So we were faced with
two of three
> studies saying there was something
different about this
> pesticide. We decided we couldn't allow it
in food without
> more tests."
>
> Starlink's developers, eager to market
their product,
> invoked a little-known EPA rule that allows
some
> pesticides and herbicides to be used on
feed for animals
> but not on food destined for humans. This
"split
> registration" had never been sought for
genetically
> modified products. Johnson notes. "We
looked at each
> other and said, 'What do we know about
allergens? We
> know they don't pass through cattle.' We
spoke to USDA
> and FDA, and they said [Starlink] passes
the standard.
> We didn't feel real comfortable with it.
But the law
> prevents us from saying, `We don't like
your product.' So
> we allowed it but put restrictions on it."
For their caution,
> Johnson says, "we were denounced as
pointy-headed
> regulators."
>
> The restrictions on Starlink corn were
severe. It could be
> grown only for animal feed or for nonfood
use, such as
> conversion to ethanol. Because regulators
worried that
> windblown pollen from Starlink stalks could
pass the
> Cry9 gene to ordinary corn, farmers had to
leave
> 660-foot buffer strips around their
Starlink fields. Farmers
> bringing the corn to market had to notify
grain elevators
> that it could not be used in human food.
The EPA
> ordered Starlink's developers to require
all farmers who
> bought the seed to sign a form affirming
that they
> understood the restrictions and would abide
by them.
> The company also promised to conduct a
"statistically
> valid" survey of Starlink growers to ensure
they were
> following the rules. Finally, says Johnson,
"the company
> agreed to accept full liability if anything
went wrong."
>
> Neither Aventis nor its predecessor
companies ever
> produced much Starlink corn. Instead they
inserted the
> newly spliced genes into small amounts of
corn and sold
> the resulting sprouts to recd companies.
These then
> planted Starlink in greenhouses, harvested
the corn, and
> replanted it to create more seed.
Eventually the seed
> companies contracted with farmers who grow
large
> volumes of corn for seed under controlled
conditions
> outdoors. Once that seed was harvested, the
companies
> had enough Starlink seed to begin
marketing.
>
> Ultimately, about a dozen small seed
companies licensed
> Starlink corn from Plant Genetics. The
Garst Seed Co.,
> which is near Des Moines and has one of the
longest
> pedigrees in the seed business, produced
the vast
> majority of Starlink corn, according to
Aventis executives.
> Garst, as is common with smaller seed
companies, relies
> heavily on "farmer dealers" to sell its
products. These are
> usually farmers who use the slow winter
months to
> schmooze relatives and neighbors into
buying a few
> thousand dollars' worth of seed. In 1998,
the first year
> Starlink was on the market, just 10,000
acres were
> planted. Last year a mere 350,000 of
America's 79.6
> million acres of corn were Starlink. The
highest
> concentration of Starlink in any state last
year was 1.1 %
> in Iowa, Garst's backyard.
>
> Nevertheless, the proliferation of Bt corn
was causing
> growing concern outside the Farmbelt. In
April 1999 an
> entomology professor at Cornell University
researching
> corn-borer resistance to Bt reported that
he had fed a
> diet of corn pollen to monarch butterflies'
larvae. Many of
> the monarchs that ate Bt pollen died. This
caused a furor
> among environmentalists, who admire the
monarch for its
> yearly migration from Mexico and back. Many
> environmentalists are profoundly worried
about all
> genetically altered plants and animals,
fearful that they
> contain health hazards that won't become
apparent for
> years, or that they will somehow reproduce
wildly and
> overwhelm ordinary species. For
environmentalists, the
> monarch was about to become the poster
butterfly of the
> anti-Frankenfood movement.
>
> Among the environmentalists who led the
charge against
> Bt corn was Larry Bohlen, an engineer by
training and a
> senior official in the Washington office of
Friends of the
> Earth. For years FOE and other greens had
been trying
> to get the U.S. government to sign
international protocols
> on the use of genetically modified
organisms. "When the
> Cornell study on monarch butterflies came
out, we had
> our first tangible example of the kind of
impact genetic
> crops could have," says Bohlen. He wrote to
President
> Clinton asking that use of Bt plants be
suspended until
> their effect on nontarget animals could be
determined.
> And he began writing to consumer-product
companies
> like Campbell's, Kellogg, and Frito-Lay,
urging them to
> forswear all genetically modified food.
Last July the
> campaign began in earnest. Bohlen arranged
for popular
> foods to be tested for genetically altered
ingredients "so
> we could contact the manufacturers and tell
them to be
> more careful."
>
> Eventually Bohlen learned about Starlink.
"When I asked
> grain elevator operators and farmers how
Starlink and
> other unapproved varieties were being
segregated, I was
> told that separation was difficult and that
very little
> segregation was being done." Bingo. Bohlen
had his
> galvanizing image. "By summer it seemed
there was a
> good chance Starlink had made it into the
food supply."
> In late July of last year, Bohlen went to
the Safeway near
> his home in Silver Spring, Md., and filled
his grocery cart
> "with all the corn products I could find."
He sent them to
> Genetic ID, an Iowa lab that routinely
checks commodity
> shipments bound for Europe to make sure
they comply
> with European Union standards. In September
the news
> that Starlink corn had been found in tacos
made by Kraft
> and sold under the Taco Bell brand was
splashed across
> the front page of the Washington Post.
>
> David Witherspoon, president of the Garst
Seed Co.,
> can't recall where he was when the news
broke. That's
> surprising, because if anybody should have
been
> electrified by the development, it was the
head of Garst,
> which sold nearly all the Starlink produced
in the U.S.
> "We were very concerned," Witherspoon now
says.
> Aventis executives say they were
flabbergasted and
> didn't believe the reports at first. A
biotech industry
> organization immediately questioned the
reliability of
> Genetic ID. But then Kraft ordered its own
tests of the
> tacos; it found Starlink and recalled more
than a million
> boxes. Other taco makers did the same.
Kellogg shut
> down one of its mills because it feared
Starlink
> contamination. Grain elevators, in the
midst of gathering
> the fall harvest, scrambled for ways to
test arriving
> truckloads for Starlink contamination. In
many ways it
> was too late; most of the Starlink in the
nation's food had
> come from the 1999 corn crop. And because
1999 had
> been a bumper year, there were more than a
billion
> bushels of unsold corn still sitting in
silos. No one knew
> how much of it was mixed with Starlink.
>
>
>
> Illinois farmer Howard Buffets (Warren's
son) says
> Starlink shows the difficulty of separating
subtly different
> products.
>
> How did this happen? Every farmer who had
bought
> Starlink signed a form agreeing to keep it
out of the
> human food supply, right? Well, not
exactly. Many of the
> 2,500 Starlink farmers appear to have been
clueless
> about it. Hundreds claimed their seed
salesmen never
> told them they were buying Starlink, and
certainly didn't
> pass on any precautions about how to plant
it. The head
> of the agriculture committee of the Iowa
House of
> Representatives, Ralph Klemme, says he
bought Starlink
> but was never told it was forbidden for use
in food.
> Thomas Miller, the Iowa Attorney General,
says "the vast
> majority" of farmers did not sign any forms
> acknowledging planting and marketing
limits. It was not
> until a few weeks after the Starlink news
broke that
> farmers who planted the seed received a
letter asking
> them to sign and return some forms; the
forms appear to
> have been backdated to before the spring
planting.
> Aventis executives vigorously deny having
anything to do
> with the letter. In a telephone interview,
Garst CEO
> Witherspoon said he would "prefer not to
get into that,"
> citing potential litigation.
>
> Witherspoon insists that Garst provided
information to all
> its salesmen about Starlink. Asked whether
Garst
> salesmen were diligent about having farmers
sign the
> EPA-required forms, Witherspoon was vague.
"The
> dealers would have started getting the
forms and would
> know we had them. We tried to get them to
dealers. We'd
> remind them to use them."
>
> It seems unlikely that Garst's farmer
salesmen would
> have knowingly deceived customers. The seed
business
> relies heavily on the trust that exists
when farmers sell
> seed to relatives and neighbors. Garst is
one of the
> oldest companies in the business; it began
in 1930 by
> marketing hybrid seeds developed by Henry
A. Wallace,
> the founder of Pioneer Hi-Bred. (Wallace
was later Vice
> President under Franklin Roosevelt.) Garst
was so well
> known that Soviet Premier Nikita Krushchev
visited its
> founder, Roswell Garst, on his Iowa farm in
1959. But the
> company ran into trouble in the early
1980s, when
> Pioneer severed its relationship with Garst
to market its
> own seed. Garst lost the bitter lawsuit
that ensued. The
> family sold the business to ICI, the
British chemical
> company, in 1985. (Du Pont bought Pioneer
in 1999.) ICI
> later spun off its U.S. seed business to
Zeneca, a British
> drug company. Garst is now a part of
Advanta, a joint
> venture between Zeneca and Royal
Vander-Have Group
> in the Netherlands. Ironically, Advanta
made headlines in
> Europe last year when canola seeds it had
sold there
> were found to contain small amounts of
genetically
> altered material forbidden by the EU. The
seeds, grown
> in Canada, may have been contaminated by
windblown
> pollen from other canola nearby.
>
> "I am outraged at Aventis," says Stephen
Johnson of the
> EPA. "This is enormously important
technology. We
> trusted Aventis to handle it properly, and
they didn't."
> Aventis eventually took responsibility for
the Starlink
> mess; the company is spending millions to
locate the
> rogue corn so that it can be put into
animal feed. Aventis
> executives say that they thought Garst was
spelling out
> the restrictions on Starlink to farmers,
but hint that they
> didn't monitor Garst carefully. Neil Harl,
the agricultural
> economist at Iowa State, says he doubts
Garst was
> motivated to be very explicit about how
Starlink had to be
> grown and sold. "What farmer would buy a
variety of
> seed if he was told he had to plant a
660foot buffer strip
> around it, and would have to go through all
sorts of
> special separation and storage after the
harvest?"
> Witherspoon disagrees, saying the company
sent 15
> mailings to Starlink farmers. As for the
"statistically
> significant" survey of farmer compliance
that Aventis had
> promised the EPA, the company appears to
have
> dropped the ball. Garst conducted the
survey, says an
> Aventis executive, but did it right after
the harvest, when
> most corn was still stored on farms.
>
> Both Garst and Aventis officials implied in
interviews that
> if they failed to live up to all their
agreements with the
> EPA, it was because they were convinced
Starlink would
> soon get full approval for use in food and
that the special
> conditions would be lifted. "Aventis was
working very
> hard on those approvals," says Witherspoon.
>
> If Starlink triggers hysteria about genetic
food in the U.S.,
> the world's biggest appetite for that
promising technology
> will dry up, and the science will be
retarded for years.
> Even after giving Aventis and Garst their
share of the
> blame, there's plenty more to go around.
Johnson, the
> EPA official, now concedes that a split
registration for
> Starlink, allowing it in feed but not food,
was a dumb
> idea. "It was the first and last time we
will allow that," he
> says. Critics point accusingly at the FDA,
which was
> supposed to enforce food standards
established by the
> EPA. Larry Bohlen at Friends of the Earth
says the FDA
> didn't even have a way of testing for
Starlink in food and
> that the agency moved slowly when news of
the
> contamination first came out. "Kraft ran
circles around the
> FDA. The day Kraft pulled its tacos off the
shelf, the FDA
> was faxing me to ask if I would send them
some of my
> taco shells. Kraft had already tested and
confirmed on
> multiple lots." An FDA spokeswoman declined
to
> comment on the agency's role in Starlink.
>
> To its belated credit, Aventis has been
aggressively
> trying to locate Starlink seed. It
requested Garst's list of
> Starlink customers and met with all of them
within days.
> Aventis is paying farmers up to 25 cents
for each bushel
> of Starlink seed fed to animals. When
grain-elevator
> owners discover that a batch of Starlink has
> contaminated a million-bushel silo, Aventis
negotiates
> compensation for their added efforts and
expense. The
> company has also paid for millions of test
kits used by
> farmers, food processors, and grain
handlers to identify
> traces of Starlink. Just how much is out
there is
> anybody's guess. Because many farmers
failed to plant
> buffer strips, pollen sometimes drifted
into neighbors'
> fields, causing that corn to test positive.
Moreover, some
> Garst seed varieties that weren't supposed
to contain
> Starlink turn out to have been
contaminated, the
> company now admits, and that adds to the
difficulty of
> finding it.
>
> Even though Aventis executives don't argue
with
> assertions that the debacle may cost the
company
> hundreds of millions of dollars, Wall
Street appears
> unfazed. Aventis ADRs climbed from $71 to
$77 between
> early September and late January. Some
farmers have
> fared well too. Even if they planned all
along to feed the
> Starlink they grew to their cattle, Aventis
is paying them a
> premium for it.
>
> But the reactions of people like Jerry Rowe
are more
> typical. Rowe manages the Farmers Grain
Cooperative,
> a four-million-bushel grain elevator in
Dalton City, Ill. He
> says Starlink has greatly complicated his
life. At peak
> times he unloads a truck every two minutes.
"The
> Starlink test takes five minutes per truck,
and I can't
> afford to slow down." And his sampling
probe could miss
> Starlink lurking in a far corner of a
truck. "Maybe I'll miss
> it coming in, but the customer finds it
when I'm shipping it
> out," says Rowe. Corn that Rowe could sell
for $2.14 a
> bushel to Archer Daniels Midland in nearby
Decatur
> might get rejected, forcing him to spend 20
cents a
> bushel to ship it to Cedar Rapids, where
the pay is just
> $2.06. Rowe also worries that if he finds
Starlink in his
> bins a year from now, Aventis won't
compensate him.
> Aventis claims that it will.
>
> The long-term consequences of Starlink seed
are hard to
> predict. No serious health problems have
emerged so
> far. About three dozen people complained to
the FDA
> about bad reactions to corn products in the
days after
> Starlink first made headlines. Many clearly
did not have
> allergic reactions, and virtually all the
rest had mild
> problems like itchy eyes or a tight throat.
A pediatric
> allergist from Duke University told a
scientific advisory
> panel convened by the EPA that unless
someone has an
> anaphylactic reaction to Starlink, he or
she does not
> have a food allergy. But the panel decided
that Starlink
> does indeed walk and talk like a potential
allergen, and
> advised the EPA to turn down a request by
Aventis that
> small amounts of it be allowed in the food
supply.
>
> Starlink has not triggered widespread
hysteria about
> genetically modified food in the U.S., to
the
> disappointment, no doubt, of some
environmental
> groups. But Johnson at the EPA still
worries that the
> episode may slow the acceptance of
genetically modified
> products. "I am outraged at Aventis," he
says. "This is
> enormously important technology. We trusted
Aventis to
> handle it properly, and they didn't."
>
> He is probably right to be concerned.
Pierre Deloffre,
> head of a large French vegetable-processing
company,
> told a seed trade convention in Chicago
last December
> that Europeans turned abruptly away from
genetically
> modified foods during the 1990s. Deloffre
blames
> government regulators and scientists who
failed to
> respond properly to Chernobyl, AIDS in the
blood supply,
> and mad cow disease for eroding Europeans'
confidence
> in technology. "Five years ago the first
boatloads of
> genetically modified soybeans arrived here
without the
> slightest reaction," says Deloffre. Now the
EU barely
> touches them.
>
> Although Europe hasn't imported much
American corn for
> years, Japan is a large customer. The
Japanese have
> been fairly tolerant of bioengineered food,
but they, too,
> are growing cautious. New rules that take
effect in Japan
> this spring will require labels on food to
state if it contains
> genetically modified ingredients. An
executive at ADM
> says orders from Japan for unmodified corn
and soy
> have already begun to climb in anticipation
of the new
> labels.
>
> Since it caused no serious illnesses,
Starlink will
> probably be a footnote in future agronomy
textbooks. In
> reality, though, this was a disturbingly
close brush with
> disaster. Starlink was probably circulating
in the food
> supply for a year before it was found. If
it had been slow
> acting but truly dangerous, like mad cow
disease, the
> damage could have been enormous. Critical
links in the
> food chain from Aventis and Garst to
thousands of small
> farmers-turned out to be either unconcerned
about or
> oblivious to what they were selling and
growing.
>
> If we're lucky, maybe Starlink will also be
a wake-up call,
> reminding us that tinkering with Mother
Nature is risky
> business -and that it's not just
white-coated lab
> technicians who must be careful. Solving
the problem of
> hunger and malnutrition may ultimately
depend not so
> much on science as on our faith in science
and all its
> stewards. And if you can't trust a farmer,
who can you
> trust?
>
>
> Organic Consumers Association -
> http://www.purefood.org
>
>
>
>
>
> MainPage
> http://www.rense.com
>
> ANOMALOUS IMAGES AND UFO FILES
> http://www.anomalous-images.com
>
>
> -> To unsubscribe send email to snetnews-unsubscribe@topica.com
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less.
> Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose.
> http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
>
--- Woodrow Anselen
--- troscorp@earthlink.net
--- EarthLink: It's your Internet.
-> To unsubscribe send email to snetnews-unsubscribe@topica.com
____________________________________________________________
T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less.
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose.
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
|
|
Disclaimer: The file contained in the
box above or displayed in a separate window from a link in the
box above is NOT owned nor implied to
be owned by BeYoND THe iLLuSioN. Most files at BeYoND THe
iLLuSioN are originally from public Bulletin Board Systems
(BBS) which were popular in the days before the Internet or
from gopher, web, and FTP sites from the early days of the
Internet which no longer exist today. Essentially, all files
were acquired from the public domain in one for or another.
However, there have been occasions when copyright protected
material has appeared on BeYoND THe iLLuSIoN without permission
of the copyright holder. In these instances, we have and will
continue to remove the copyright protected file as soon as it
is brought to our attention. This can now be done using our Report Copyright Material form. Fill
out the form, and the webmaster will be notified of the
situation.
There are also times when files found on BeYoND THe iLLuSioN
have a real home somewhere else on the Internet. In these
instances, we will gladly replace the file with a link to its
true home whenever it is brought to our attention. If you know
of the true home of any of these files, you can use our Report Original URL form to bring it yo our
attention.
|