From: "Terry W. Colvin" 
Subject: Re: IUFO: global spread of AIDS is reaching catastrophic dimensions
Date: 2 May 2000 18:17:28 -0400
To: iufo@topica.com, "forteana@primenet.com" 

->  IUFO  Mailing List

AIDS...UFO Connection
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 10:16:00 -0400

AIDS...And the UFO Connection: A Possible Plan for Genocide? 
by B.- W.- L.- (California)
This article is quoted from the March 1989 issue of *Flying Saucer Review*, 
Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 12-14 & 6. Note: An "*" indicates italics.
     Long ago I came to a whole lot of conclusions about the true
significance
of the "UFO Phenomenon" which it might not be prudent to voice. Subsequent 
events and revelations have only reinforced this feeling, and in a recent 
letter from a British reader who works in the Defence field (see pages 17/18
of FSR 31/4, "Food For Thought") certain important possibilities were hinted
at.
     The contribution from our Californian subscriber, the artist B.- W.-
L-, which I reproduce below, will be found to be in line with that same trend
of though, and I suggest that it deserves careful study, although I must add
that since I received it I have begun to see an entirely different possible
explanation than the one adopted by the writer, and one that is maybe slightly
less ominous for mankind as a whole. I must also add that I would never have
considered publishing this article had it not come to me with a personal
reference from one of FSR's most respected U.S. Consultants.
     So far as one can learn, it seems that the "official" view about the
origin of AIDS is that the disease has suddenly emerged from Central Africa,
after lying unknown there for who knows how long, and has then passed into
the U.S.A. and Western Europe on a large scale probably via Haiti -- at least
as some have suggested. Well, it is of course true that, after a century of 
exploration and research, there still remains much to be discovered in the
heart of the Dark Continent in all spheres, including the medical.
Nevertheless, I find it incomprehensible that so many Western doctors and 
nurses who have worked in Africa so extensively would not have come upon any
trace of it earlier, and, frankly, I rather doubt the "African Explanation",
though I admit that it is a very 'handy' one. And I am not entirely convinced
that our own Governments believe in it.(1) Alternatively, might it not in fact 
have been a particularly clever ruse on somebody's part to *elaborate* the 
disease *elsewhere*, and then to *implant* it in the highly suitable field
of Central Africa and let it burst upon the world as a new "African"
disease?
     As regards the theory that it was launched in order to wipe us out, I
don't quite "buy" it at present, because, surely, so many far, far easier 
methods could have been found by anybody desirous of eliminating us.
Moreover, if you are a normal human, with normal habits (i.e. habits provided
for by the Great Creative Powers that run this world) then it does not seem to
be all that easy to contract AIDS. Far more probable, in my view, would be the
explanation that, since there are Alien Powers of an intermediate level -- 
who are probably our *Owners* and would clearly regard us as *herds* to be
exploited, or as biological-banks or gene-pools, then they would of course
(like any sensible farmer or herdsman) be concerned to keep their cattle normal
and healthy and disease-free, and would therefore take effective steps to
eliminate any undesirable taints likely to impair the quality or quantity of the
genetic material available, and particularly so should they themselves depend in
some way on the latter for some part of their own well-being!(2) -- EDITOR
     *"Intellects, vast, cool, and unsympathetic, regarded our Earth with
envious eyes and, slowly but surely, they drew their plans against us."* -- 
H.G. Wells, "THE WAR OF THE WORLDS" (1898).(3)
     By way of introduction, may I state that I am a concerned citizen who
happens to be an artist and a printer. Over the years I have built up an 
extensive knowledge on the subject of UFOs, reading books and articles by 
such authors as Frank Edwards, Gordon Creighton, John G. Fuller, Jim and 
Coral Lorenzen, Ralph and Judy Blum, and many other private investigators.
     The gravity of the AIDS crisis makes it *imperative* that we consider
all possibilities as to its origin ... even if the evidence is vaguely 
circumstantial. If we are to find a cure for this "ANDROMEDA STRAIN"  -- 
then finding its *origin* could give our scientists the edge they need.
     What I may have discovered is a connection(4) between AIDS and the
animal mutilations of the 1970s[and beyond]. For it strikes me as a little 
more than coincidental that the nature of the mutilations has a parallel 
with the way in which AIDS is transmitted.
     We humans have short attention-spans. Thus, when events are separated
by large gaps in time, we have difficulty in visualizing what in this case 
could be a deadly scenario.
     Are we being victimized by hostile alien forces? Before you answer
*"No!"*, consider these facts:-
                              The Facts
     During the 1970s the world experienced a bizarre and gruesome
phenomenon commonly known as *"animal mutilations"*. In the United States alone,
some 10,000 cattle were butchered with such surgical precision that our veteri- 
narians were stunned and baffled by the method used. The mutilations 
stretched from Oregon to Tennessee ... one-third of the extent of the 
Continental United States.
*1. All slaughtered cattle were drained of blood.
  a. AIDS is a blood disease.
2. Many cows had their reproductive organs removed.
  a. AIDS is transmitted by sexual contact.
3. In many cases the entire anal canal was removed.
  a. AIDS first began to manifest in the "gay" community, and involved the
peculiarly absorptive properties of the anal canal with which so many of 
the "gays" are so preoccupied.(5) Other organs taken were eyeballs, 
tongues, heads, and large patches of epidermis.
4. The animal mutilations started in 1972 -- and diminished in 1978.
  a. The AIDS syndrome began in 1977 ... amounting to the five-year
incubation-period! (1972-1977.)[or 10-year (1972-1982)].*
     All of these surface details were widely published and are easily
verifiable. The mutilations were investigated at the highest levels. At 
one point the F.B.I. became involved, but nothing was reported to be 
resolved, the problem becoming a colossal embarrassment to the 
authorities. They simply hoped that it would go away. The ranchers, for 
their part, knew that something alien was descending on their cattle. 
They watched large glowing lights in the night sky ... then smaller 
lights descending to do their dirty work, as the coming of day would 
reveal.(6)
     Looking at the nature of the mutilations, one could surmise that
aliens were engaged in massive research into various ways of spreading 
the virus through human contact.
     Mark Feinberg of Stanford University says: *"AIDS is unlike any 
disease that is prevented by vaccination. It attacks the very antibody- 
producing machinery that a vaccine is supposed to stimulate." And he says 
further: "AIDS has mutant strains, an ever-changing genetic structure. 
It's like trying to hit a moving target".* (NEWSWEEK, November 24, 1986.)
                         Logistics
     If an invading armada wanted to decimate the human population, there
would be no need to transport massive war equipment across the depths of 
Space. There would be no need for blazing ray-guns or neutron bombs. A 
deadly genetic virus would do the job rather well, and leave the environ- 
ment intact.
     The mutilations did happen, and the reasons for them were never given
or explained by anyone. I submit that, if we continue on our present course 
of blind complacency and indifference in regard to UFO activity, there may 
be little salvation for the human population.
     It is my hope that those who are in authority will reopen the
mutilation investigation and, in this new light, look for other clues that might
put our scientists on the path to a solution. In my firm opinion, AIDS was
designed and calculated to invade the blood, lie dormant for a long period, so 
as to be passed on to others, and finally kill the host. While we are
preoccupied
with fighting(7) one another over issues of territory, race, and religion, we
may

ALL be victimized, AND POSSIBLY FOR JUST THOSE REASONS.
     Are we to learn nothing from the ranks of those with vision?
  A  Alien
  I  Induced
  D  Disease
  S  Syndrome

COMMENTS BY EDITOR, FSR (Gordon Creighton)
(1) We now have plenty of evidence that Governments know all about the 
facts, and have known for a long time. We know that it is not true that
the American authorities and the F.B.I. and the veterinarians are "baffled" 
by the mutilation phenomenon, because we now have plenty of evidence that 
they know all about it and have probably connived at it, being forced under 
duress to do so. We know that abundant testimony exists, from several
members of the public who have actually witnessed the cattle mutilations by the
small aliens known as *"the Greys"*, and there are rumours and reports to the
effect that a leading terrestrial government actually made some sort of
*deal* with these beings, a good many years ago, "permitting" them to engage in
the mutilations and to establish underground bases on our Planet, in return for 
technical and scientific information! If such reports are true, it is obvious
that such a "deal" can only have been made by a government because it was 
*under duress*, and had no other option.
(2) If there is truth in the persistent reports and rumours that the aliens 
are in serious biological trouble themselves and are in dire need of DNA or 
organs or other genetic material, then it should not be surprising if they 
decide to take what they want from us and from our herds of cattle. In this 
connection, be it noted that in February 1984 Dr James Womack of Texas A.&M.
University announced that his researches had shown (see his Report in the 
U.S. national journal *Genetic Maps*) that big chunks of cattle chromosomes 
are identical with large sections of human chromosomes. This means that 
cattle genes and human genes fall in the same sequence on some chromosomes. 
Said Dr Womack: *"We must have more in common (with cows) than previously 
believed. Humans carry 23 pairs of chromosomes which contain all the here- 
ditary factors, while cows have 30 pairs"*.
     Two years later (1986) it was also reported, from Texas Tech. 
University, that the blood of cattle can be used as an emergency substitute 
in blood transfusions, because the haemoglobin of cattle matches ours very 
closely. Obviously these new and quite unexpected discoveries by our 
scientists will have thrown a lot of light upon the cattle mutilations!
     At this point we come to the 64-billion-dollar question: *What are the
"Grey" Aliens actually doing with the sperm, and the ova, and the DNA and 
the various organs and body parts which they are clearly taking in such 
quantities from our cattle and from us.? Are they using the material in 
order to strengthen their own physical organisms? Or, far more sinister a 
possibility, are they already making biological robots? And if those bio- 
logical robots are already here among us, possibly in very large numbers, 
does it not constitute a major "Trojan Horse" situation -- an invasion from 
within?*
(3) And I draw the reader's attention to the intensely "interesting" fact 
that H.G. Wells wrote this famous best-seller in 1897 -- *precisely one year
after the massive "UFO visitation" of the U.S.A. in 1896!*
(4) What I have already said above should make it clear that, while I do not
necessarily share the view of B.- W.- L.- that AIDS was designed by them for
the express purpose of wiping us *all* out, I do agree with him that they 
might have engineered it. *But for their own benefit! Any farmer or herdsman
who deliberately introduced a killing disease into the animals on whom he is
dependent for a part of his own well-being would be a lunatic! But it would 
not be surprising if he did it in order to "clean" and "purify" his stock!* 
(5) An all-wise God, Nature, or Providence -- call it what you will (at any 
rate it wasn't Karl Marx!) -- has seen to it that the vaginal canal of 
females is exceedingly tough and resistant and can stand an enormous amount 
of buffeting and ill-treatment. The walls of the human anal canal however 
are thin and delicate, for that organ was designed -- also by that same 
all-seeing Power -- to serve as a vitally important *absorption area*. It 
should not be surprising therefore if creatures which do not conduct them- 
selves according to the rules laid down by the Creative Power of the 
Universe perish.
(6) As already stated above, it is not true that the authorities were so 
ignorant of the facts. In the near future we shall publish details of cases 
in which humans chanced upon the *"Greys"* and found them carrying out the 
animal mutilations.
(7) Mankind's own inherited capacity for internecine strife is all to evi- 
dent, one of our ancestors having been a particularly vicious African 
killer-ape, so the proclivity seems to be there in us, even without the 
"assistance" provided by the demons who get their kicks by egging us on. So 
aren't all these latest reports about "PEACE" breaking out everywhere on our
planet just a wee bit strange, and *out of character* for humans? Can the 
reason for all this be that our Governments are beginning to be more than a 
trifle worried about the presence of the "Aliens"? After slaying each other 
so joyously for eight years, the bloodthirsty Iranian Muslims and the blood-
thirsty Iraqi Muslims suddenly start talking about "peace". We are told 
that, after years and years in Africa, the 50,000 Cuban troops, who have no 
national justification for being there, are suddenly talking of going home 
soon. Even more astounding, the Russians say they are quitting Afghanistan! 
North Korea is said to be making some nicer noises in the direction of South
Korea. There is talk of improv[ing] the situation in Kampuchea[Cambodia]. 
And the Polisario freedom-fighters in the former Spanish colony in N.W. 
Africa are said to be patching things up with the Moroccans! Somehow, I just
don't believe it all. It sounds altogether too "unnatural"!
     However -- there's one exception at any rate. There's not a squeak yet 
about any of the I.R.A. wanting "peace" in Northern Ireland[this changed in 
1994]. They -- at any rate -- don't seem to be in the slightest bit 
perturbed by the UFO.
                              Some Last Thoughts
     While checking through this contribution again before sending it to the
printer, I perceive that quite a long period has elapsed since I received
B.- W.- L.-'s article, and also that, like so many other folk, I had started out
by assuming, in common with so many, That the *normal* part of mankind -- the
vast majority of us -- would not be in any great danger from AIDS, inasmuch as
it
was principally prevalent among the perverted classes and the drug-addicted
elements who are hell-bent on their own destruction anyway. Seen from a certain
angle, therefore, it looked as though AIDS might prove -- quite *literally!* --
a 
*"God-send"* to us, as it might at least solve two of mankind's greatest 
problems.
     But the many medical reports and articles published so far in 1988 have
now made it far more evident that a huge section of the populations of Central 
Africa is already AIDS-infected, and this as regards the normal,
heterosexual elements. In other words, *the women are already heavily infected*.
     *With regard to the actual origins* of these retroviruses, our
scientists had discovered, in the years between 1900 and 1970, retroviruses *in
many animal species*. But as late as 1975 or so, no infectious retrovirus had
yet been found in human beings, and most scientists felt fairly confident that
they *never* would be found! But, alas, by 1980, Dr Robert C Gallow had isolated
the
first human retrovirus -- human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTVL-1). It seems
that many apes and monkeys, such as, for example, the chimpanzee, the macaque,
and especially the African green monkey, do harbour viruses of this family.
Gallo's researches led him to include that HIV has already been infecting human
beings *"for more than 20 years but less than 100"*. In answer to the question:
"where was the HIV hiding during those years, until it suddenly burst upon us as
AIDS among young homosexual men in the U.S.A. in 1981?" Dr Gallo and his French 
fellow-discoverer Dr Luc Montagnier believe that it had simply been lying 
"doggo", maybe for many years, inside very small, isolated groups of humans
in Africa who had virtually no contact with the outside world. In this way, the
virus might have continued to be contained for decades. But when increased
external contact came -- BANG! -- and it "took off in a big way."
     *Here, then, in a nutshell, you have the official scientific
explanation. But are the scientists wrong? Or, alternatively, are they being
instructed to concoct theories which will serve to conceal the facts? "For more
than 20 years but less than 100" say Drs Gallo and Montagnier.* THE MASSIVE
ALIEN ACTIVITY HERE HAS LASTED ABOUT 40 YEARS -- WELL INSIDE THAT "20 to 100
YEARS'
FRAMEWORK.
     Let us not forget that the animal mutilations (10,000 of them) were a
FACT, but, as our writer says, they have abated from the very time when AIDS was 
starting. Is there any truth, then, in the link which B.- W.- L.- tries to 
establish between UFOs and AIDS? *I suggest that it "bears thinking about
..."*
     In the last analysis, naturally, all depends upon the *motivation and 
nature of the alien species now controlling us.* If indeed they mean us
well, then the cleansing power of AIDS might be a part of the *Grand Design*.
     Should the aims of the controllers be *sinister*, (and should there be
no other aliens around with more benevolent ways of thinking towards us), then 
truly one must admit that AIDS may be the Ultimate Weapon after all.
Certainly these two factors, the AIDS, and the massive climatic changes now
affecting the Earth (especially Africa) are going to carry off an enormous
harvest.
     In any case, quite apart from such questions as AIDS, there are a
discerning few in our world who perceive what the Signs of the Times are. In
other words, they *"know what time it is"!* There is a very great deal that 
could, and might, be said about that sort of question, but, alas, on the whole
it is not a question in which FSR readers show any great interest. It would
therefore not be right to say more, at least not at present.
     My own *personal opinion* is that we are all wasting our time in
chattering about "UFOs". Because "UFOs", whatever they are, are merely *"a 
symptom of the malady"*. "A symptom of the malady now affecting this Planet."
In all probability, that "symptom" is connected with the question of "WHAT TIME
IS IT FOR EACH AND EVERY ONE OF US"? Were we to discuss that sort of question,
we would of course cease to be a "UFO magazine". And I doubt whether we would
have more than fifty readers. -G.C.

---------------------------------
"Leonidas (Guy Pettingill)" wrote:
> 
> > I would suggest that people on the list mat be a bit more savvy than you
> > may give them credit for.  And may well have extended their research
> > beyond the sensationalism of '%100 fatal and contagious by more common
> > factors'.  Fact is AIDS is NOT that easy to transmit outside of infected
> > blood, dirty IV needle sharing and high risk sexual activity (which has
> > come to be understood as more of a constellation of factors accompanying
> > the high risk behaviour.)
> 
> You are correct but, we have countries that are being devastated by this
> disease just because of the factors that you describe. We can do better here
> simply by screening blood products but I think that  this will only slow the
> spread. My feeling is based on the number of people I know who have been
> infected and I am not in any of the risk groups nor have I ever been. I know
> that this is unscientific but I would be willing to bet that nearly everyone
> knows someone in the US that is positive  with HIV now. I believe that this
> type of disease will be the biggest challenge facing humans, outside of
> overpopulation.
> 
> >
> > Any search will provide a multitude of WELL researched, credible
> > MAINSTREAM medical reports and credible scientific studies to that effect.
> 
> Granted but how many people actually read any of this stuff? I never said
> that AIDS can be transmitted by common  means, say via mosquitoes as someone
> else suggested. I am open to the possibility that there might be vectors
> that we don't know about yet. Do you think that is too far out?
> 
> >
> > And I do not for a moment regard the declaration as a "silly
> proclamation".
> 
> Did I say that you did? What do you reguard it as?
> 
> >
> > Why bring gun control into this, unless in transparent effort to
> > trivialize and divert from the questions raised.
> 
> I used gun control as an example. If you are suggesting that there is some
> nefarious purpose to the announcement. Would you care to enlighten me on
> exactly what it is?
> 
> >
> > Not ALL people who raise FAIR questions are anti gun control  activists
> > or conspiracy freaks.
> 
> I never said that they were! But I am in continual wonder at the number of
> people who can read the second amendment and not understand what it means.
> 
>  What do you consider a "FAIR" question and what do you consider, unfair. Do
> you believe that this announcement is the harbinger of some sort jack-booted
> thuggary by the US government? Do you think your freedoms will be taken
> away?
> 
> G.P.
> >
> > Arlene

-- 
Terry W. Colvin, Sierra Vista, Arizona (USA)
< fortean1@frontiernet.net >
Home Page: < http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Stargate/8958/index.html >
Sites: Fortean Times * Northwest Mysteries * Mystic's Cyberpage *
   TLCB * U.S. Message Text Formatting (USMTF) Program

-> To unsubscribe send email to iufo-unsubscribe@topica.com
___________________________________________________________
T O P I C A  The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics