Area : I_UFO
Date : Oct 24 '95, 18:29
From : Paul West, 2:254/284.4
To   : All
Subj : Creating a paradise.


Hi

Here's a poem I just wrote, or rather, which I'm about to write.
Interpretations may differ. Explaination follows.

Will? - by Paul West
--------------------

Will will will?
It will, will it?
Will will? It Will?

Well, will will will will?
Would will will with will?
Willingly?

What will wills will to will?
Will will will will to will?
Or will willing will to will will will to will?

Would willing will will will's will with will?
What will will will will to will with will?
Will?

---------------------

Manage to comprehend what it's saying?  Bet ya don't.  The purpose of
me writing this is demonstrate how something can be one thing, and
many things, simultaneously, and that it depends on your subjective
view as to which you see. If you understood ANY of the poem, then it
is not becuase of what the poem is actually saying, but instead it is
because YOU have used symbols and imagination during your
interpretation. There is only one word there, `Will', and it has only
one meaning really. Any other meaning is totally subjective.

Looking at that poem, which I think is pretty cool, to be honest,
there is only really one word being discussed.  The word "will", yet
it has so many meanings.  It depends entirely on your viewpoint as to
what you'll see. Why?  Because you are CREATING the thing you are
perceiving.  Part of the thing you just read was created by your mind,
and it is that part which you `know', which you are seeing.  Thus, how
you interpret the poem depends entirely on your mind, what I've
brought to the creation, AND what you're bringing to it.  As far as
I'm concerned, that poem has one single objective reasoning, yet you
see more than what there is.  If you were able to see the objective
meaning straight away, you'd already know exactly what the poem means.

Anyway, in case you don't, let me explain.  Firstly, you have to
create. You have to create labels.  Each label still is the same as
all the others, `will', but means something different, it has been
CREATED as something different just like the universe contains form
but is composed of the same stuff.

For example.

>Will will will?
 1    2    3

1 - Will, as in `will it', or `might it', or `could it'.
2 - Will, as in YOUR will, your will power, your free will.
3 - Will, as in what YOUR will DOES, the application of will,
    comprising a substance I'm calling `will'.

This first line basically means "Will YOUR will `will' something to
happen?"

>It will, will it?
    1     2

1 - It will, as in `so matey, you think it will'
2 - Will it, as in `are you sure?'

That one's a bit easier, and just is asking confirmation of the
previous line.

>Will will? It Will?
 1    2        3

1 - Will, as in `will it', or `might it', or `could it'.
2 - Will, as in the substance - your will, the will.
3 - It will, as in questioning wether it will do that or not.

This means "Your `will' will do that, will it?"


Okay. Let me translate the poem.

 > Will will will?
Might your free-will `will' something to happen?
 > It will, will it?
Are you sure that it will?
 > Will will? It Will?
Might it? Yes?

 > Well, will will will will?
Well, might your free-will `will' someone else's free-will?
 > Would will will with will?
Would your free-will `will' someone else's free-will, using `will'?
 > Willingly?
Would it do it willingly?

 > What will wills will to will?
Which free-will causes will to `will'?
 > Will will will will to will?
Will your free-will `will' someone else's free-will to `will'?
 > Or will willing will to will will will to will?
Or will willing someone else's will to `will', make your will `will'?

 > Would willing will will will's will with will?
Would willing your free-will make another's will `will' with `will'?
 > What will will will will to will with will?
Which free-will will `will' someone else's free-will to `will' with `will'?
 > Will?
Your `will'?


Does that make it any clearer?  Probably not much.  Can you see how
hard it is to apply proper labels to something when its all made of
the same stuff? That's the exact same position that reality is in.  It
is all made of the same stuff - consciousness.  Yet within it,
creation allows you to perceive what you're creating, so you perceive
more than one `type' of will, just as you perceive more than one type
of energy form, or thought form.

I must admit even I had some problems trying to work out what this
poem meant, afterwards, even though I'd only just written it.  Why do
we even have labels when reality is all one thing?  We've become quite
good at applying labels because we don't recognise the wholeness of
everything.  If you'd look closer and see the wholeness, the oneness,
you'd have just as much problem trying to explain reality as anyone
else.

What is the point of this poem?  To demonstrate that reality is
totally subjective, and that it only becomes objective when you create
a label and share it with someone.  If I hadn't told you roughly what
the poem means you'd probably be pulling your hair out with the
possibilities, trying to make it fit into YOUR unerstanding of
language.  What I'm saying is that reality is 100% subjective, and
only becomes objective when you share what is OUTSIDE of you.  Inside,
all is one.  You only get to have a identity if something outside of
you gives you one.  Society labels you.  People label you.  Otherwise
they think they cannot know you.  Truth is, you can ONLY `know'
someone if you DON'T label them.  Respect your fellow man for what he
IS, not for what labels you identify him with.  You truly never can
know the person if you know only their externalisation of will.

The thing they are is just neutral, just a part of the whole
consciousness. It has no identity, it just `is'.  You want to get to
know someone you like the look of?  You'll only see a shadow of them
so long as you look at them from the outside.  You've gotta look from
inside, which is what love is for.  All of man's problems are on the
outside.  Do you think it is right to change the world from the
outside?  Do you think that you can stop the world from dying just by
stopping doing some of the outside things?  No. You have to stop
creating it from the INSIDE.  You want to live in a better world?
When will you ascend?

There will ALWAYS be a `better' state that the world could be in.
When will you ever accept it?  You only get to ascend when you totally
accept reality for what it is NOW, when you totally know it for the
state it is in NOW unjudgingly.  You want to make the world better,
accept the world. Through your acceptance you will stop associating
with labels and external views of what the world should be like.
Creation happens from within, from knowing, not from external changes.
You have to change inside if you want to change the world, it's all
just a collective thought form.  If you see the world as bad, you are
creating it as bad.  If you want to see the world well again, you have
to perceive it as well, becuase you are perceiving what your mind has
already created.

Seek salvation within, by accepting the outside for what it is.
Religion cannot take you all the way, because it is based on the
external.  You create `life' within, not without.  `Create' and
`Without' (empty) doesn't work together.  The longer you see bad in
the world, the longer you are perpetuating its presence.  Why do you
think I continue to state that lucifer doesn't exist?  To even think
that he does, to even explain what I'm explaining now, gives him
existence.  It creates him.  So I continue to always deny lucifer
existence, wether he does or not.  I simply cannot even say `no',
because I need to associate with lucifer in order to understand the
question and answer it.  All the time, if you want to deny lucifer
presence and existence, you have to simply `know' `it' and thus ignore
it. You shouldn't be striving to make the world a better place in the
future. When will you ever get to a state of satisfaction.  Never.
You will only be satisfied when you totally know your creation with
open arms, unjudgingly.  Accept reality as it is NOW, and you will be
in paradise.

For years people have been trying to make the world a better place,
because they perceive it to be wrong.  Simply perceiving it to be
wrong is admitting that you have created it as such.  You are not
accepting it.  You want the world to be a paradise?  Paradise doesn't
come in the form of beautiful flowers and an unpolluted ecosystem.
Paradise is what you accept reality to be.  If you accept reality as
anything less than paradise, that is what it will be, and will become,
as you are perpetuating the notion of it being less than perfect.  Is
it any wonder the world is going downhill when people are perceiving
it to be doing so?  Even me saying that the world is going downhill is
contributing to its destruction.  Sorry.

Paradise doesn't look pretty, it doesn't look all tropical and lush.
It doesn't matter what it looks like.  Paradise isn't a looking thing,
it is a perceiving thing.  Anywhere can be paradise, no matter how it
looks.  It's all up to you with your mind.  True, working on the
damage from the outside helps to eliviate the vision that the world is
in such a state, but if you then continue to perceive it as less-than-
perfect that is how it will stay. You'll be fighting a losing battle.
Mend the world from within before you go trying to mend it without.
Without what?  Without creation of further world-destroying thoughts.
Thoughts are what makes the world the place it is, not actions.  Human
actions are mild compared to the destruction which your mind can and
is doing.

You create your OWN paradise.  Some people see the world as a
beautiful place despite what it looks like.  It is.  Everything always
was and always is beautiful.  Then, if everyone was accepting the
world entirely for what it is, would that be it?  If you accepted a
world of polluted ocean, polluted air, and polluted life, to be a
perfect symbol of creation?  It is one, but could you accept that?
Accepting reality 100%, becoming a christ, puts you in control of your
creation, and halts any biased changes.  IOW, it stops you changing
reality positive or negative, it stops the action of karma being
accepted or create.  If you accept karma, it is because YOU created
it.  When you are in total acceptance of the world AS IT IS NOW, you
will see it as a paradise and you will not desire to make it
materially better.  It might be prosperous to go FURTHER than that and
re-mould the world into a paradise which you could consider
`beautiful' from a less-evolved standpoint, but that would breach your
acceptance.  In one way, God doesn't perform miracle, he can't really.
But in the whole view, he does.

The world full of pollution and death is no more or less a paradise
than a world of vibrant meadows, mountain-fresh air, and crystal blue
waters. Trying to make the world a better place materially will never
make it a better place in your mind.  If it does, that is materialism,
and that's what delays your progress to knowing otherwise.  Then you
could ask, what made the planet to start with?  We did.  We're still
within our less-than-accepted creation.  If the whole world were to
accept reality totally, right now, the planet wouldn't return to
health.  It is always healthy, it is always `right'.  Same as life -
life is always right.  Man is a creator, you make your own paradise.
If your view of paradise is a place of perfect cleanliness and health,
then perhaps it is going to take you longer to create that paradise,
take longer for you to accept reality as you want it.  You are
entitled to accept reality and which way you want to, but if your view
of paradise is a perfectly healthy world, it's going to take the
sacrifice and prolonging of your attainment of perceived paradise.

Personally I'd like to see the world back to health, wiped free of all
the wrong I've done in the past, because only then could I properly
accept the world as being my creation.  But I could also choose to
accept it as it is, and ascend now.  The question is, do you want to
sacrifice your own ascension to try and guide material reality towards
something more conductive to other's ascending also?  Will you go
quickly, accepting reality as it is now, or will you stay awhile and
get everyone else to the same status.  Would you /really/ be seeing
YOUR creation if people still existed who didn't see their creations?
As a WHOLE, WE must see creation as a single God, that we are.  I
believe that is reason enough to get the world to a state of material
acceptance, but you must keep one thing in mind.  When will YOU be
satisfied?

Acceptance also includes accepting the state other people are in, so
would you be in paradise if you hadn't accepted the world as being
`good enough' for everyone else? No. You only 100% accept when you
accept everything, bar nothing. I suppose it's nature's course to lead
us into a gradual awakening which will allow our attitudes to repair
the damage we've done. But don't forget that we are pretty
insignificant minds compared to the planetary mind. The mind if Gaia
is so much more powerful than all us humans together, so even any
amount of damage we do to the planet isn't really going to make much
of a difference, in relation to what the planet perceives to be okay.
Anyway, the planet goes through cycles on its own, despite what us
humans get up to. It destroys parts of itself and then is reborn as a
healthy environemnt again. So are you really saving the world? Can you
EVER be saving it? No. There is no `saving', or `dying'. Everything
always `is' right. Right?

God looked at his creation and saw that it was good. ;)

Regards,
Paul.

Fidonet 2:251/30.15   SearchNet 114:3/0.4   PsychoNet 1080:108/0.4
Internet MrWest@15.Shining.Conqueror.Co.Uk  Mercury 240:190/16.15
---
 * Origin:  (2:254/284.4)