This area is for information only, and should not be considered as medical advice. It is supplied so that you can make an informed decision. Please consult with your health practitioner before considering any therapy or therapy protocol.

NEW...Oral HGH Spray...You Really Can Grow Young Again!

OxyFile #11

Reprinted with kind permission from Nexus Magazine

Oxygen Therapy - The Empire Strikes Back

From Nexus Magazine - December 93 - January 94
Volume 2, Number 17

Edited by Ruth Parnell from the transcript of a taped radio 
interview conducted in mid-1993 by Gary Null of WBAI, a 
public supported radio station in New York.  505 Eighth 
Avenue, 19th Floor, New York, NY, USA. Ph: (212) 279-0707


The Australian media recently spearheaded the international 
assault on ozone therapy. Utilising a range of Orwellian 
tape-editing tricks mixed with half-truths, the media down-
under have ensured that AIDS patients will continue to die 
in ever increasing numbers!  Meanwhile, those who have 
experienced ozone treatments for cancer and AIDS are 
lobbying to continue ozone therapy -- as the treatment of 
their choice!

"Basil Wainwright has categorically invented a process to 
purify whole donor blood in the bag, and his invention of 
polyatomic apheresis ozone technology has created the most 
significant break-through in the treatment of AIDS and 
degenerative diseases found anywhere in the world to date." 
(Richard Bernard - Polyatomic Apheresis Inc.)

GN = Gary Null
SAT = Sue Ann Taylor
BW = Basil Wainwright

GN: This programme is Natural Living, and I'm Gary Null of 
WBAI, a public-supported radio station. Tonight I'll be 
talking to Sue Ann Taylor, an investigative journalist, and 
Basil Wainwright, a scientist and inventor of a particular 
ozone machine. Why is he in the Metropolitan Correction 
Center in Miami--the jail? Why hasn't he had a trial in 
three years? Why does the government not want his story to 
get out? More on that later.

Is HIV the cause of AIDS? HIV has never been found in any 
scientific studies anywhere in the world to be the sole 
cause of AIDS. No one can prove it. It is speculation. It is 
political and economic. The man who said in 1984 that HIV 
was the probable cause of AIDS (instantly it became dogma 
that it was)--did he also inform the public he was the 
primary beneficiary of a test for HIV, that he owns the 
patent and that millions of dollars have gone to him and his 
associates? No.

Did the press vigorously explore all the allegations of 
fraud and corruption? No. The alternative press did. We're 
the ones that brought you that information. They tell you 
don't challenge orthodoxy. We challenge you not to believe 
that but rather to believe the experience of those who are 
the ultimate authorities: the patients who are alive and 
well, having had the opportunity to intelligently review the 
best of both and see what works, and that's what we bring 
you.

You've heard previously from patients successfully treated 
using non-toxic therapies, you've heard from the physicians 
who've treated them. Now today, in this segment, Sue Ann 
Taylor, investigative journalist, welcome to our programme.

SAT: Hello!

GN: Sue, you recently returned from the Philippines where 
you observed and recorded the effects of ozone treatment and 
a polyatomic apheresis therapy on a group of HIV-positive 
and AIDS patients. Would you give us the background of this 
and why it is so important that the people hear this story?

SAT: Well, I was researching for a documentary that I had 
been working on, called Living Proof--People Walking Away 
From AIDS Healthy, because I was finding more and more 
evidence that there were things that were in fact working 
for some AIDS cases and/or HIV-positive cases. In doing that 
research I came upon ozone therapy, and I also came upon all 
the controversy that surrounds it. So when I was offered the 
opportunity to actually watch a trial happen first hand, in 
the Philippines, I jumped at the chance.

I went to the Philippines and I was stunned with what I saw, 
because I was expecting the entire thing to take place in a 
sort of wing of a hospital, or something that looked a 
little bit more like what I expected medicine to look like. 
It was actually a clinic that was set up rather ad hoc to 
provide space to do justice to this trial, so I started out 
a little on the sceptical side, not knowing what I was 
getting into.

There were 19 HIV-positive people there, five of whom had 
full-blown AIDS. Over the course of about three weeks I 
watched the patients, or participants as they preferred to 
be called--six of whom were in pretty bad shape--I watched 
them go through some pretty remarkable transformations and I 
saw it happen before my very own eyes. There's no amount of 
journalists or medical people who can tell me that what I 
saw I didn't see. I saw people who were unable to walk, be 
able to walk again. I saw people who were very, very ill 
just get considerably better, and all of the treatment was 
cut short by a raid by the government.

The Philippines government came in and shut down the entire 
operation, and only about one-third of the prescribed amount 
of treatment had been accomplished. It was a trial, so 
remember there wasn't an absolute number on how much 
treatment they were going to need--that was part of what 
they were there to establish--but one-third of what they 
were expecting would be close to the magic number of hours 
on the machine, had been accomplished, and in that period of 
time remarkable reversals in these people's conditions were 
evident.

GN: Alright, describe the clinic.

SAT: The [Cebu] clinic itself was an upscale home in the 
Philippines. An upscale home in the Philippines looks kind 
of like an upscale home in America. It was a very large 
home, two storey, fairly large lot, and behind the home they 
had built grass hut kind of things, but it wasn't as crude 
as that makes it sound; it really had a vacation resort feel 
to it. It was not really unacceptable--and by Philippines 
standards it was just fine. I had an opportunity to go to 
one of the Philippines hospitals, and our cleanliness within 
the clinic beat the cleanliness of the Philippines hospitals 
that I visited. So, what I had to do was readjust my western 
benchmarks to a third world's benchmarks, and I learnt a lot 
in the process, educating all the Filipino staff who were 
excellent--I would pit their training against any training 
of any nursing staff anywhere in the world; their knowledge 
was excellent. But some of the things we take for granted, 
like refrigeration and insect control, they just have really 
come to learn to live with those things, so we had to 
educate those people as to what western standards would be. 
The clinic was, by our own standards, crude but it was, you 
know, acceptable also. The materials were all new; it's 
just, again, it didn't meet my preliminary expectations.

GN: Who was working there?

SAT: Working there were three parties, actually. There was a 
group from Australia--the clinic was actually owned by a 
couple named Bob and Rosanna Graham. The second group was 
PAI, the polyatomic apheresis unit group, and all they did 
was supply the equipment and people to train the Philippine 
staff to use the equipment; and the third group was the 
Philippine staff which consisted of two Philippine doctors 
and 11 nurses.

GN: And who were the patients?

SAT: The patients were 20 Australians, 19 with HIV, one with 
multiple cancers.

GN: Is it illegal to enter the Philippines if you are an 
HIV-positive person?

SAT: My understanding is that it is illegal to go in HIV-
positive, but Immigration does not question you; there is no 
testing and I don't know that the patients realised that it 
was illegal.

GN: Could you tell us some of the success stories of the 
patients?

SAT: The most dramatic success story was a man named Paul. 
Paul is 42 years old, he has been HIV-positive since 1984, 
has full-blown AIDS and Kaposi's sarcoma. The lesions, the 
Kaposi's sarcoma lesions on the bottom of his feet were so 
great when he left for the Philippines that he couldn't 
walk. He was in slippers for over a year. He could not wear 
shoes. He gingerly walked on the outsides of his feet and it 
was very difficult for him to get around at all. After 11 
hours of treatment on the machine, Paul's lesions went away. 
He was able to wear leather shoes and, most importantly to 
Paul, he was off morphine for the first time in four years. 
Prior to his going to the Philippines, the cancer hospital 
had told him that he had reached the maximum amount of 
radiation that he could receive safely, and he would have to 
simply continue to increase his morphine to deal with his 
increasing pain. And Paul believed that he experienced just 
miraculous treatment, that in 11 hours of that treatment the 
lesions on his feet went away and he could wear shoes and 
walk normally again.

GN: Let's now describe what the treatment consisted of.

SAT: Certainly. The polyatomic apheresis looks like the 
following: a patient sits in a chair that looks a little 
like a dentist's chair. It's a comfortable chair. There are 
needles, intravenous needles inserted in both of their arms. 
The blood coming out of the left arm is pulled through a 
pump that is somehow in synch with the heart rate, and a 
circuit of blood is created between the left arm coming out 
and the right arm coming in. The blood goes through a series 
of tubes, goes down through a cascade tube where it is met 
with ozone under pressure, and at that point that's where 
the viral kill happens. The blood continues down through an 
escape tube, through a filter, back into their right arm. 
What you see visually is the blood exiting the left arm is a 
very black colour; it is BLACK. It goes down through this 
cascade tube, which is a wide-bore cascade tube, about an 
inch in diameter, and it goes back into the arm, the right 
arm, a bright cherry-red colour. It comes out looking 
alarmingly different--this is with the HIV patients--
alarmingly different than you would expect.

Now, the first patient I saw on the machine was a person 
without HIV. She was a normal person who had an infected 
foot, and her blood came out looking like yours and mine 
would, and went back in only slightly differently than it 
came out; so what I witnessed was that the HIV patients' 
blood was considerably blacker than a normal person's and 
went back considerably lighter. That's, in a nutshell, what 
it is.

GN: Alright, now, what other parts of the therapy were 
included with this ozone treatment, and how does this ozone 
treatment differ from, let's say, one which would be done in 
New York where you pull out about, oh, a half a pint of 
blood, ozonate it and put it back in the arm over about a 15 
to 20 minute period?

SAT: Okay, I've never witnessed any of the other treatments 
that you're talking about. The only two ozone treatments 
that I've seen actually operate are the polyatomic apheresis 
and, using the same equipment, a process called rectal 
insufflation where the ozone gas is put in through a 
catheter into the rectum, which becomes an ozone enema, so 
to speak. Those two were used at the clinic and in 
conjunction with one another. Some of the participants in 
the study had experienced that treatment that you are 
talking about and had some success with it. What they 
believe from their own experience, what they told me, is 
that it was the difference between a Volkswagen and a Rolls 
Royce, from what they felt with the treatment you're talking 
about getting in New York versus what they got in the 
Philippines.

GN: So, far more productive in the Philippines?

SAT: Correct.

GN: Now, what happened to these 20 patients? Where are they 
at now and have there been any additional protocols for 
these people to follow?

SAT: Okay. The turning point of everything was on March 19. 
The youngest participant was a 23-year-old woman named Jodi, 
and she had full-blown AIDS. It was a real tragedy because 
she really kind of represented all of our daughters, and her 
courage was phenomenal. She died in the clinic and that's 
when things started to tumble very quickly. She died from a 
series of complications. I'm not a medical expert but I 
believe she received two insufflations too close together 
and her body had trouble coping with the amount of ozone 
that she had taken in. She also received those against 
doctors' orders, so I guess it would have to be chalked up 
to human error rather than anything to do with the 
equipment. She received the ozone via the rectal 
insufflation.

GN: You mean the Philippine doctors had suggested she not 
take those?

SAT: Actually, it was the American doctor, the expert on the 
ozone, who had said this girl shouldn't have another until 
she recovers a little bit. She had remarkable success on the 
equipment, though. When I first arrived I was afraid Jodi 
was not going to make it until the equipment arrived. There 
were all kinds of customs hang-ups that prevented the 
equipment from getting into the country and getting set up 
on time. So the patients arrived ahead of the equipment, 
which was a real management error because it just added too 
much stress to the patients.

GN: By the way, who raided the clinic?

SAT: It was raided by the Department of Immigration.

GM: Was there any evidence the FDA had been involved in the 
raid?

SAT: There was not any evidence that the FDA had been 
involved; but what I was told was that the story really got 
underway when Australia's version of A Current Affair did a 
scathing story on the clinic and what the patients were 
about to experience, just as they were getting on the plane. 
I was told by another journalist in Australia who I trust, 
that ACA is the one who went in to the Department of 
Immigration and tipped them off; so I believe that there was 
something operating there. I was also told that the 
producers were directed by their upper management to do a 
'chuck job' on the ozone therapy. An no matter what they 
were told, no matter how much positive information they were 
given, it never aired; and I watched this happen time after 
time.

GN: So, in other words, there was a gross bias in the media, 
from your interpretation, to prevent positive stories about 
the success of ozone from getting back to the general 
population?

SAT: It's not even a question of interpretation. I watched 
it happen; I watched the participants give interviews; I 
gave interviews myself. We would turn on the TV and we would 
be shocked at what actually would show up. Paul, whom I was 
telling you about, would tell his entire story; he would 
show his feet, all of those things; and he made a comment in 
one of the television interviews were he said, After I got 
going I could just feel in my heart that this was working. 
That little snippet is the only thing that they would use, 
and then they would cut to the doctor saying, Well, you 
know, there's a certain amount of mind over matter, and all 
that kind of stuff. So they were completely dismissing the 
science of it and trying to make it sound like their 
improvements were all in their own minds; but 15 patients 
had improved T-cell counts, one as high as a 70% increase.

GN: We are talking with Sue Ann Taylor about one particular 
type of therapy and one clinical experience that was 
interrupted in the Philippines. A group of 19 individuals 
with AIDS and ARC underwent a particular type of ozone 
treatment. As you have heard Sue Ann Taylor say, remarkable 
results were shown in the majority of patients. 
Unfortunately, the clinic was raided and closed down and the 
participants went back to Australia.

I would like to shift gears, however, and bring in another 
individual to share a different perspective on this, and one 
that we haven't talked about in the past. Basil Wainwright, 
welcome to our programme.

BW: Thank you very much, Gary. I must congratulate you on 
running a super programme and a very courageous one too.

GN: Basil, you are now incarcerated in Florida?

BW: That's right, so if any of your listeners hear any 
background effects, I must apologise for that. I am 
currently incarcerated down here in Miami.

GN: From what I understand, you are a scientist and your are 
the inventor of this polyatomic machine, this ozone machine, 
and that you have been incarcerated without trial for three 
years. Is that correct?

BW: Yes, I'm now well into my third year without trial and 
some seven violations of my basic human rights.

GN: What are those violations?

BW: Well, there's the 4th amendment and the 5th amendment, 
the 6th amendment has been violated, and the 8th, and 14th. 
So...

GN: What has happened to your attorney filing proper motions 
to get a fair and speedy trial? That's one of the 
constitutional provisions for people who are incarcerated. I 
haven't heard of people waiting three years except this 
particular political detainee who was here in New York, the 
IRA supporter who was held for some seven years.

BW: That is absolutely right. Well, it all started that--
really, I suppose I should give you and your listeners a 
brief synopsis. I was working with Dr. Viebahn in Germany 
and I was brought into this project along with Medizone, and 
then got very much involved in the process. And I was 
somewhat intrigued to find that nobody had really done any 
specific testing, i.e., looking at the cytotoxic levels or, 
that is, the concentration of ozone, looking at the specific 
atomic structures of that, and also the contacting time; so 
there were an awful lot of areas that particularly 
interested me. I worked with the University of Medicine and 
Dentistry and also the Mt. Sinai Hospital with Dr. Weinburg 
and with Dr. Michael Carpendale, and started to get very, 
very involved in the course.

It was very evident there were some phenomenal results being 
seen in the AIDS area and I started to look at it more in-
depth. There were several controversies going on as to 
whether it was a function of free radical reaction or 
oxidation--but of course both of those functions occur 
extensively--and also this ionisation; and I wanted to 
determine the specific parameters of that, because when 
people refer to ozone you might just as well refer to a 
vehicle being involved in a collision because you're not 
really defining the atomic structure of ozone which can be 
multifold. There can be many aggregate combinations of 
molecules which can have very specifically different 
responses, and I wanted to determine this.

GN: Since 1985 you have been working with some German 
doctors including Dr. Viebahn that you talked about. Now, 
you had a way of determining that the ozone being used back 
then was not as effective as the way you could create a 
better ozone; they were using 02 but you also saw 03 and 04.

BW: Yes.

GN: And you also were looking at two major factors: the 
concentration in relationship to agglomerate measurements, 
and oxidation; and then you were looking at the viral 
inactivation?

BW: Yes.

GN: Now tell us about what you found with what you created 
concerning viral inactivation.

BW: Well, of course, I think it's very important for your 
listeners to know that the reason scientists refer to 
retroviruses' inactivation as opposed to being killed is 
because normal micro-organisms have metabolic mechanisms, 
whereas a retrovirus could almost be considered a piece of 
genetic material drifting around in the bloodstream. And, 
so, it's rather difficult to kill a non-living thing, hence 
scientists refer to inactivation. We looked at these various 
techniques and procedures and I suppose what really kicked 
it off was our study which we did with Biotest down here in 
Miami, where--having determined that the German process 
worked but indeed wouldn't be dramatically effective because 
they were not treating high enough volumes of blood--they'd 
also determined that once someone had been taken back to 
negative using polyatomic oxygen or ozone, they indeed 
remained negative. I think there is only one case of Horst 
Kief's that actually went back to positive, so that was 
rather unique because all the doctors were saying, Okay, so 
what? You get somebody to negative, but in a couple of 
months' time they're going to go back to positive. Well, 
that fact was proven not to be the case, which I think even 
surprised the Germans. And it might well be that the immune 
system kicks back in, and when we say negative we're looking 
a nucleic acid response or PCR work to determine that; but 
certainly the patients were not going back to positive--that 
was very interesting.

So we though, okay, if these patients are going to use 
autohemotherapy which you referred to earlier, Gary, where 
you take out half a pint of blood, treat it with ozone, and 
then reinfuse it back into the patient, that was taking 
typically 11 months, of course combined with a very rigid 
nutritional control as well. But using that process it was 
very evident that it's like chipping away at a mountain with 
an ice pick when you're looking at the view of the pandemic 
facing mankind; and it became very apparent in 1987 that the 
best way to go was with dialysis or a dialysis-type 
procedure. So I worked with Cobe and other dialysis 
equipment and in fact filed my first dialysis patients using 
ozone in 1988. But, however, using ordinary dialysis 
equipment which is a hollow fibre membrane, we discovered 
there was too much homolysis occurring as a result of that; 
also, the thing that we refer to as mechanical shear. The 
very fact of pumping the blood round outside the body can 
cause all sorts of trauma to cells--there are thermal 
reactions, there are pressure zones, the pumping head itself 
can actually crush cells-so we had to look at a number of 
factors. And then, when we did more research, we found that 
04 in particular had some very unique responses. It has a 
phenomenal amount of electrons; as a matter of interest in 
04 you have 40 electrons, and that makes it a very powerful 
negative ionising platform drifting around in your 
bloodstream. It also was far more stable than 03 which again 
was completely the reverse of what everyone was projecting.

It was very evident that 03 had a better oxidative effect, 
and that was very effective in eliminating infected cells, 
but 04 had the ability because of its ionisation to break 
down, we believe, the RNA, and of course uracil, which is a 
very important sugar combination--the 5-carbon sugar in the 
virus RNA--was actually being broken down. Well, when we 
actually achieved this, we did our first study down at 
Biotest Laboratories here in Miami--hence my incarceration 
down here. We did this study and as far as I know, for the 
first time in history, using apheresis we successfully 
converted HIV-positive to negative, and we could do this 
time and time again using PCR. That's the reason we came 
here, actually, because Biotest Laboratories in conjunction 
with Miami University had this latest state-of-the-art 
equipment; and from that very moment the FDA whichhunt 
started.

We tried to keep a relatively low profile but of course the 
word soon got around the system, and then one night I came 
home and the SWAT team descended, guns drawn, and eight of 
them sort of crashed in the front door. I was arrested and 
charged with practising medicine without a licence, which of 
course is complete nonsense. But the SWAT team, instead of 
looking for anything that might indeed have been relevant to 
my practising medicine without a licence, all they did was 
dig out all my patent specifications, technical data and 
intellectual property rights. So they came with a very 
specific directive from the FDA, to seize all my 
intellectual property rights. From there I was sort of 
thrown in a state prison; mechanisms graunched on. 
Eventually I had charges from the FDA which boil down to 
sending and selling ozone generators from interstate-
interstate trading laws, etc. Unfortunately, a couple of 
months after I was in prison, I detected a very severe heart 
condition. In fact, if this radio show had been yesterday I 
doubt very much if I could have done it. But nonetheless 
they detected I had a very severe heart condition, and it's 
progressed to a point now where I'm collapsing and having 
blackouts and stuff, but still hanging in there. I've just 
recently done a technical paper.

Well, from that episode this series of things went on, and 
as you quite rightly say--and I certainly won't bore your 
listeners with the phenomenal list of violations against me-
-I'm now into my third year; come October I'll be commencing 
my fourth year without any trial. I've just recently been 
appointed some new attorney who is hopeful of trying to get 
me bond. In fact, Dr. Michael Carpendale and other doctors 
very courageously were flying into Florida for a major 
hearing in front of the judge. Everything was scheduled but 
at the very last moment the FDA stepped in again and the 
hearing was cancelled, and my research team had to 
frantically phone around and cancel everyone coming in. I 
did get bond, much to the amazement of the FDA, which was 
really a administrative error, and I was out for a few 
months. During that time we managed to get a number of 
apheresis systems put together and out into studies.

Most of the studies which were conducted in and around the 
United States of course have already had the FDA SWAT teams 
descend on them, close them down and seize equipment. And 
we've had things reported like seven p24 antigen negatives, 
a couple of PCR negatives, but at no time have we ever been 
able to get into the real completion of a study. In every 
case, I think the doctors would tell you they've seen 
absolutely dramatic results, and that's not from me because 
this information has been fed back to us. They of course are 
very concerned that they're not in a position to pursue 
this, and the process does really show some pretty dramatic 
potential--that's exactly what Dr. Carpendale is saying--and 
the only way we are ever going to get this out there is if 
the AIDS groups get up and demand polyatomic apheresis so 
that we can get these studies up and running. We've got a 
group working with two very, very prominent stars that are 
hopeful of applying the sufficient pressure to be able to 
get this achieved.

During our studies we managed to determine that protein 
aspects in the blood, in other words, high protein levels 
would have an inhibiting effect. The normal procedure that 
has been adopted by the Germans, i.e., introducing 
antioxidants--which is very popular over here too--was 
negating the effects of ozone. Everyone in the United States 
can enjoy the wonderful efficacy of ozone; there is nothing 
against the law that you can't use it, and there are several 
ways of applying it. In our protocols, prior to treatment 
the patients will be receiving no antioxidants so that we 
get the maximum oxidative effect from the 03 component which 
we use 2% by weight, and 6% by weight of 04; and we have a 
pretty rigid nutritional programme too.

GN: So let me see if I can put this into perspective. Basil 
Wainwright is now in a jail in Florida for developing a 
special form of ozone machine that puts an 04 into the body. 
There are a number of patients, estimated as high as 200, 
who have undergone this polyatomic apheresis treatment so 
far. These have included HIV, environmental and degenerative 
diseases, approximately 30 persons with AIDS. Of those 30 
people, all show dramatic improvement, seven are p24 antigen 
negative, and two are PCR negative, meaning there is no HIV 
viral DNA found in their bodies, and the p24 means there is 
no active replication--all replication of the HIV is done. 
For the effort, you have been put in prison without trial. 
When the doctors did come to testify on your behalf, the FDA 
saw that the hearings were postponed. On a technical glitch, 
you were allowed out, and then, when they found out the 
technical glitch they put you back in; and you have been in 
violation of several due processes including a speedy trial. 
Why weren't the other doctors put on trial or arrested? Why 
were you the only person involved in this?

BW: Well, because I was the primary motivating force and the 
one that indeed held the patents in the United States office 
for polyatomic apheresis, which is quite unique. The only 
reason that I can think of is that I enjoyed the energy in 
working in the process. We have a wonderful team, they're 
all terribly dedicated to helping people, and we would like 
to think we are motivated in attempting to do God's work. 
Sue Ann and everyone else who have been involved have 
expressed love and compassion to all these patients, so it's 
been more than just a research project for me. I thoroughly 
enjoyed working with the patients. Of course, the 
pharmaceutical companies cannot file a patent on ozone, and 
you can only file patents on the intellectual property 
rights or the designs of the delivery mechanisms to the 
patient; and being as we have those, I suppose the best 
thing they could do and their only reaction was to throw me 
in prison, hoping that it would completely bring everything 
to a halt. It hasn't done that.

There's been a dedicated bunch of people out there; they 
definitely need more support. We would certainly provide 
equipment for AIDS groups in the United States if they would 
only get up and demand polyatomic apheresis and demand 
studies which they could do. We would be only too pleased to 
provide the equipment and, indeed, a number of very top 
doctors are prepared to come along and offer their services 
and monitor and support these test studies. You undoubtedly 
know that Ed McCabe has been doing some tremendous work in 
trying to open people's horizons on these issues, and Ed of 
course has been very supportive and he's become very 
supportive because he's been seeing the successes. 
Unfortunately, a lot of the doctors that have been involved 
in the research have had terrible pressure applied to them; 
in fact, their very jobs and livelihoods have been 
threatened by the FDA, which is very, very sad. I must admit 
when I first came to the States in 1987 on this particular 
project, the people told me this sort of thing existed in 
the United States and I thought it was all James Bond stuff, 
but of course I soon learnt to the contrary that indeed it 
was fact, and here I am. All I want to do in fact is get out 
here and research and work for the betterment of mankind and 
just simply conduct God's work. In fact, I've just finished 
two scientific papers whilst I've been incarcerated, and 
I've been working very, very hard.

A lot of good things: we've got a Middle East project which 
has been confirmed which will be up and running very soon; 
the Canadian government with NATO of course, as you've 
probably read, indicated great interest. Well, they've 
actually approached us and we've had talks with them about 
structuring a very special process which we've developed. 
It's from the blood bag to the patient, so for the armed 
forces, if they get injured out in the field and they're 
having delivery or transfusion of a unit of blood, there's 
this process we've developed which goes in series or in line 
with the IV to the patient, which actually purifies the 
blood with polyatomic structures before it goes into the 
wounded soldier. So, despite my various bouts of illnesses 
and I must admit it's been a bit touch and go at times, I've 
certainly been keeping myself active, Gary, and as I said 
I've certainly been following your programme with intent and 
your work with intent, and I hope your listeners out there 
realise what a super person you are and how you're 
projecting this work and making this awareness to the people 
out there.

GN: Thank you Basil Wainwright, and let's hope for the best 
and that justice will be served by being fair and by seeing 
that your machine is tested. I want to thank you also for 
being on today, Sue Ann Taylor. Any closing thought for us?

SAT: Well, the closing thought that I have is, after the 
raid the mayor of the city gave the Department of Health the 
opportunity that if they wanted the study to continue, he 
would make space available in a hospital and make the 
patients the guests of the city. For them to turn down that 
offer and shut it down without looking at the patient's 
records, of which the blood tests all showed improvements, 
or watching a demonstration--that's when I started to 
believe that there was some level of a conspiracy happening 
right before my eyes, because they had made up their minds 
in the face of an offer from the mayor and said let's finish 
it right here. The only other point that I wanted to make, 
that I found alarming, is that people who have the ability 
to make those decisions were that closed-minded about the 
patients' pleas that this could save our lives, that they 
shut the door in their faces.

GN: Sue Ann Taylor, you learned a good lesson, and that 
lesson unfortunately is a bitter one: not always do the 
patients count when there is a political or economic agenda 
ahead of their interest.  Thank you very much. I am Gary 
Null; the programme is Natural Living.


NEWS UPDATE -- 29TH OCTOBER 1993

-Under a new agreement between the USA and Mexico, the FBI 
has been conducting armed raids of ozone clinics inside 
Mexico.

-NEXUS has learned that Basil Wainwright is being held in a 
20-man cell currently holding 41 people. He has had 2 heart 
attacks plus 4 major blackouts in the last 6 weeks, and has 
been hospitalised 19 times since his incarceration. It was 
discovered two months ago that his medication for 
Parkinson's disease had been altered so that he was 
receiving the maximum, and often lethal, dosage of the drug 
Simatrol and its generic, Amantadine.

-In both Australia and New Zealand, as well as the USA, the 
health authorities have been conducting crackdowns and 
closures of businesses involved with oxygen therapies.

-NEXUS has been contacted by scores of readers who have 
reported excellent results from their experience with oxygen 
therapy.

For more information on the Polyatomic Apheresis unit:

POLYATOMIC APHERESIS INC.
6278 North Federal Highway, Suite 410
For Lauderdale, FL 33308, USA.
Phone (305) 942-8976; Fax: (305) 942-8482


From Nexus Letters to the editor...
Nexus February - March 1984
Volume 2, Number 18.

Re: Ozone Therapy vs AIDS

Dear Duncan

The report in your last edition in regard to Sue Ann Taylor 
and Basil Wainwright was reasonably accurate. There are a 
couple of corrections, one being that Jodi did not die 
because of human error; she died of AIDS and the side-
effects of that disease. Jodi was taken to my in-laws' place 
for the cremation arrangements.

In regard to the financial problems that we had when A 
Current Affair ran their story, the bank closed our 
accounts, including a $50,000 line of credit, and posted a 
cheque to us made out to Cebu Ozone Treatment Centre. The 
cheque could not be cashed because we could not open an 
account at any other bank. We finally got the cheque re-
written and payable to one of the directors. As for the 
$50,000 line of credit, a caveat was enacted on the property 
and it is only next month that we will be able to go to 
court to have it removed.

My wife flew home on the same plane with the patients. What 
the press stated was a lie--that my wife and myself fled the 
Philippines long before these events happened.  We stated 
this during my TV interview, but it was never shown and the 
press never printed it.

We have the Polyatomic Apheresis unit ready in Australia. We 
offer it on loan to any group or individual doctors who will 
operate this on clinical trial basis to save lives. What we 
have seen with this equipment indicates that it may be the 
answer for AIDS victims and cancer sufferers, but we will 
never know unless trials are conducted and completed. Many 
great forces are at work to make sure that this technology 
will ever serve mankind.

Robert Graham
PO Box 61
Carlton North, Vic 3054
Fax: (03) 336-4467

Nexus Magazine is available by subscription by calling 815-
253-6464.  ($25 per year USA within USA - 6 issues, or $30 
USA for Canadian subscribers.)