Transcribed from a international shortwave broadcast on WWCR in June 1993.

THE HOUR OF THE TIME
with Bill Cooper

CAJI
Box 1420
Sholo, Arizona 85901

Occult hotline 310-281-8222

========================================================================

We are living in the last days of freedom for the average man--property
forfeiture for speeches, writings, and assembly. The Crime Control Act
of 1993 is aimed at me and many others who would dare wake you up, stir
you to action, who would dare tell you the truth about what's happening
in this world. The Crime Control Act of 1993 redefines illegal search
and seizure while eliminating an innocent citizen's civil redress and
suits against government officials and agents.

Title 7 Section 2337 (again that's Title 7 Section 2337) incorporated or
provisions of proposed SB 265 titled "Terrorism, Death Penalty Act of
1991" and Senator Biden's SB 266 "Comprehensive Counter Terrorism Act of
1991,"--both bills contain the language which can charge law abiding
citizens of being agents or affording support to terrorist
organizations.

Consider this, folks: the property forfeiture effects on organizations
and individuals when speeches, writings, and assemblies mentioned in SB
265 are combined with the forfeiture provisions of Biden's SB 266, now
incorporated in the Crime Control Act of 1993. Any individual or
organization in the United States who had or should have had knowledge
that an associate might commit a terrorist act can have their property
seized. Written like federal drug forfeiture laws, a citizen who allowed
their home to be used for an assembly would start out guilty, having to
prove they did not have knowledge of the unlawful methods of the
organization or individuals they allowed to use their property.

Politically active organizations and labor unions are especially
vulnerable to the Crime Control Act of 1993 provisions, which they
define bodily acts as "terrorist acts." A fist fight at a demonstration
or picket line would qualify. The physical act need not cause bodily
harm as its provisions refer to "involving any violent act." What this
means is folks, is if you hold a meeting at your home or place of
business where people speak politically against something or politically
for something, and then any individual who was at that meeting goes out
and commits any violent act, you're in big trouble. You're in big
trouble.

According to these bills, on this radio show, if I talk to you and
inspire you to action--and I have never ever called for violence of any
kind or advocated violence of any kind, on the contrary I have stated
repeatedly that the purpose of trying to wake you sheeple up is to
prevent the violence that is coming, is to prevent it. As a whole
people, we can act now legally and lawfully within the system to stop
all that is coming. You know under these bills, folks, if anyone of us,
me or anyone else who has a radio program--and tries to stir you to
political action, if anyone of you go out and commit a violent act, it
is possible under these laws that I or anyone else who is performing the
functions that I am performing could be charged as a terrorist, as an
accomplice to that act.

These bills are aimed directly at the heart of the Constitution and the
Bill of Rights. I don't even know why they keep on trying to do this
stuff. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights are dead anyway. Waco
proved that. Why do they keep this stuff up? Why do I even care? Why do
you care? Why am I doing this show? What makes me think that anything is
going to change? Well, I have to do it simply because it's required,
it's required by the rules by which I live my life. And the rules by
which I live my life is that I must do the right thing irregardless of
what the rest of you do, irregardless of whether anybody listens to me
or not. I must do what I know is right. So I must continue. I wish more
people went by that rule. We wouldn't have all these problems, would we?

S8, the Crime Control Act of 1993, forfeiture provisions which seem
aimed at public dissent are written like RICO laws taking on the added
prospect of political property forfeiture. Broadly written, intent to
commit terrorist acts is defined "appear to be intended (1) to
intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (2) to enforce the policy of
a government by intimidation or coercion." That means any radio show.
That means any television show. That means any public speech. That means
any public demonstration. That means any march in Washington.

You people better wake up. The secret societies, the Freemasons, the
Socialists are in total control and that's where this stuff is coming
from. They intend to put you under their heel and smash you into the
dirt. They won't do that to me. I'd rather die first, and probably will.

It would appear, folks, that provisions contained in Senator Biden's,
remember that name, Senator Biden's proposed Senate Bill 266 now
included in the Crime Control Act of 1993 target any group of persons
which would dare demonstrate for or against any issue.

Any picket line which is allowed to have blocked public access could
qualify to intimidate or coerce a civilian population. Should violence
result for any reason at a public assembly, the property forfeiture
provisions of the Crime Control Act of 1993 may be triggered causing
forfeiture of attending demonstrators' homes used for meetings and the
vehicles they used for transportation to the event.

Demonstrators and/or pickets who left messages on a member or
organization computer bulletin board system could cause the forfeiture
of the system and all its records. The fact the system operator had no
knowledge of any planned violence will not prevent property forfeiture
of organization and member assets.

You better be listening to me. You had better be listening to me. You
better understand what I am telling you tonight. According to these
laws--these bills, they're not law yet--you can stop them. You can stop
them. Conspiracy is enough and the provisions of the Crime Control Act
of 1993, property forfeiture, arrest, huge fines, and prison sentences
can result from "activities which appear to be intended toward
violence." Distributing political action flyers could qualify.

The Crime Control Act of 1993 terrorist provisions when first examined
are misleading, for they give the reader the impression they are after
agents of a foreign power wishing to do Americans harm. But the "Trojan
horse" in the Crime Control Act of 1993 is this: anyone in the United
States committing an undefined violent act or attending an assembly can
be charged with terrorism. If they defend it under Section 2333 of Title
7, terrorist acts and/or conspiracy seeks to discover from the
Department of Justice the evidence against him, the attorney for the
government may object on the ground that compliance will interfere with
a criminal investigation or prosecution of the incident or a national
security operation related to the incident which is the subject of civil
litigation.

Example: government civil forfeiture--expected. Defense against
government charges may be difficult where citizens have no access to
knowing of the alleged evidence against them or the right to cross
examine government secret witnesses.

Everything that our forefathers fled Europe to get away from and
everything that we fought against in World War II is coming true before
our very eyes. It's all coming back to us because we've been lazy,
apathetic, and stupid. Stupid sheeple, despicable, stupid sheeple. And
if that makes you angry, it only proves that you are one.

Secret trials, sealed warrants, secret witnesses. Going to prison
because you spoke up against something. Or you held a sign and marched
on a picket line. This is America? No, folks. This is Hitler's dream of
the future world. Socialism is Nazism. Socialism is Fascism. If you are a
socialist, you are a traitor. You are the scum of the earth. And I don't
care whether you like it or not. That's the truth. Secret witnesses,
secret trials, protection of jurors and witnesses in capital cases.

Chapter 113B Section 138 states that the list of veniremen and witnesses
need not be furnished to capital offense defendants should the court
find by a preponderance of the evidence that providing the list may
jeopardize the life or safety of any person. And who decides that? Well,
they do, of course.

Title 7 Section 2337 states the Crime Control Act of 1993 eliminates
civil suits against the United States and foreign governments by persons
injured resulting from government agents in pursuit of prevention of
terrorist acts. If they raid your home because they made a stupid
mistake and kill your entire family, you cannot sue the United States
government or foreign governments.

Title 7 Section 711 - Sentencing Guidelines Increased for Terrorist
Crimes. The United States sentencing commission shall have the power to
provide an increase in the base offense level for any felony committed
in the United States that involves or is intended to promote
international terrorism.

Participation by political activists in lawful speeches, writings, and
public assemblies may be used as evidence by government to show that a
political participant was aware of the unlawful methods of the
individual or organization they are alleged to have afforded support.
One person's violent unlawful act at an assembly may be enough for the
government to allege the assembly appears to be intended toward violence
or activities which could intimidate or coerce a civilian population.

Under current drug forfeiture laws, innocent citizens have been
implicated by informants who will often testify to anything to mitigate
their own arrest. This folks, has resulted in innocent citizens being
arrested and killed by drug agents, forfeiture of all of their property
and financial ruination for that person and their whole family.

Under proposed provisions of the Crime Control Act of 1993, special
breaks are afforded informants, even against the death penalty. The
government will have no difficulty creating informants, creating
informants to cause the incarceration of any citizen considered a threat
to ones political agenda.

Have you got the message yet out there? Are you listening? Do you care?
Or do you think they're just going to use this against some more wackos
like the people in WACO texas or the Weaver family in Idaho? Or maybe
you're like the Mexicans and think that the guys in the Alamo were a
bunch of kooks. In London our forefathers were insane radical kooks.
You'd better wake up. You'd better wake up.

Disproportionate zero tolerance laws have served as precedents for
expanding forfeiture. Since 1984, forfeiture laws have been operating on
the erroneous contingent that property can possess intent to commit
crime. Let me read that again for you so that you don't mistake what I
just said. Since 1984, forfeiture laws have been operating on the
erroneous contingent that property can possess intent to commit crime.

Innocent owners can have their property seized prior to trial on mere
suspicion. Starting out guilty, the owner having to prove they did not
have reason to know that their property was being used to facilitate a
forfeitable offense, and in many cases being completely innocent, their
property having been used for nothing but in the case of hydroponics.

Many hydroponics dealers have had all of their equipment and inventory
confiscated on the grounds that it could be used to grow marijuana. Did
you know this was taking place, folks? Did you know that many
hydroponics businesses have been put out of business and all their
assets, property and inventory has been seized on the grounds that
someone could buy hydroponics equipment and grow marijuana? You didn't
know that, did you? And the government is not about to let you know it
either. Nope. The government need only show the property owner was
negligent in making his property available for illegal drug activity to
cause its forfeiture. What is negligent? Selling hydroponic equipment to
someone who is growing marijuana. How are you supposed to know what that
person is growing? In some cases, just selling it, and I'm only using
that as an example, folks. There are many, many, many other equally as
good or better examples.

The forfeiture scam--tenants arrested on real property when offered a
sentencing deal by a prosecutor or immunity from further prosecution
often reply in testimony, "that had the real property owner been
vigilant he or she could have discovered drug activity taking place on
their property." Government has used against real property owners in
civil forfeiture actions, the fact that a property owner had reported to
police that a tenant was dealing drugs at their property, to show an
owner had prior knowledge of the activity. And their property was
confiscated anyway, even though the property owner acted correctly by
calling the police. By calling the police they proved that they had
knowledge and thus lost their property.

Elderly citizens afraid to face machine guns and other threats by drug
dealers are especially vulnerable to having their homes and rental
property seized. Elderly property owners often in bad health are easy
prey for police forfeiture squads. Did you know that if you own a house
and rent it out to someone, and they're dealing in drugs or growing
marijuana in the closet or something like that, you can lose your home,
your property, even though you didn't even know what they were doing?

The Crime Control Act of 1993 will allow government to use against its
citizens illegally seized evidence. Searches, wiretaps and seizures that
result in obtaining evidence from an invalid warrant, but were carried
out in reasonable reliance on a warrant issued by a detached and neutral
magistrate, found to be invalid based on misleading information or
reckless disregard of the truth, are why instances override
constitutional Fourth Amendment protection against illegal search and
seizure.

S8, the Crime Control Act of 1993, amends the exclusionary rule to add
Section 3509 - Admissibility Of Evidence Obtained By Search Or Seizure:
(A) evidence obtained by objectively reasonable search or seizure; (B)
evidence not excludable by statute or rule sets the groundwork for
government forfeiture squads to at random invade innocent owners' homes
and businesses with a minimum of probable cause or no probable cause.
Government need only assert that "a search and seizure was carried out
in circumstances justifying an objectively reasonable belief that it was
in conformity with the Fourth Amendment."

Informants now being paid by government 25% of net proceeds realized
from forfeited assets in drug related seizures can earn similar amounts
causing forfeiture of citizens' homes they alleged to have been used by
an owner for discussion of attending assemblies which the informant
believed "appeared to be intended for violence or to intimidate or
coerce a civilian population." The Crime Control Act of 1993 S8. The
Crime Control Act of 1993 S8. Informants and law enforcement agencies
addressing prevention of terrorists acts are to be funded by forfeiture
and fines collected from terrorists and/or persons alleged to have
afforded terrorists material support. All citizens exercising their
constitutional right to free expression and association be targeted by
government agents who know their jobs are dependent on property
seizures, fines and arrests. I guarantee you, folks, that they will.

Have you been listening during this hour? Have you been listening,
Church Universal and Triumphant? Have you been listening, citizens of
the United States of America? Have you been listening, people who are
concerned about your childrens' future, your grandchildrens' future? And
if you're selfish, how about your own future? How about your own future?
Do you really care? Are you going to do something? Are you going to stop
these things from happening? Are you going to stop these bills? The
Crime Control Act of 1993 S8. Are you going to insist that Title 7
Section 2337 be repealed? Are you going to do that? How about Chapter
113B Section 138? How about Senator Biden's SB 266? Senator Biden's SB
266? How about Senator Biden and the rest of the traitors in congress?
What are you going to do about it, if anything? If anything?

Now if you're one of the people out there who just tuned in or maybe
haven't been listening to this program and you really don't know what's
going on, you need to order my book, BEHOLD A PALE HORSE. BEHOLD A PALE
HORSE is 500 pages of the most well-documented, suppressed information
ever printed in the history of the world and it's been the underground
best seller for 2 years in a row. By underground means it's been banned,
and I literally mean banned from major book chains and book stores. To
order send $30 to CAJI, Box 1420, Sholo, AZ 85901.