From: Franklin Wayne Poley 
Subject: SNET: Balkans-The Serb Side of the Story.
Date: 11 Apr 1999 14:33:17 -0400
To: EthnicConflicts@onelist.com


->  SNETNEWS  Mailing List

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 02:06:32 -0400
From: John V. Wilmerding 
To: CERJ_Commentaries@cerj.org
Cc: Gary Shapiro 
Subject: The Balkans: A Controversial Account

Here's an account on Bosnia and Yugoslavia by someone who was there in the
early nineties and has some different perspectives to offer.

Since anything that seems remotely to sympathize with or support the Serbs
is controversial at the moment, I decided to have the account read and
critiqued by a good friend of mine who does neutral conflict resolution
work in the region, Gary Shapiro of Conflict Resolution Catalysts in
Montpelier, Vermont, USA.  First I'm posting Gary's comments -- because
they serve as a good introduction -- then the controversial account, which
is written by CERJ correspondent and prison historian Joel GAzis-SAx:

On Sat, 10 Apr 1999, Gary Shapiro at Conflict Resolution Catalysts
 commented:

Dear John:

I just read Joel Gazis-Sax' piece, and overall I think it is very good.  I
can relate to all of what he says, because I had similar experiences when I
was in the Balkans.

Joel is articulating another side of the complex Balkans situation.  It is
a perspective that is quite real (as are other perspectives) but very
unpopular at the time, and it remains almost taboo even today.

Those who tried to express the concerns, needs, and sufferings of the Serbs
were heavily criticized and sometimes ostracized.  I know this personally.

There are many "truths" and realities in the Balkans, depending on one's
background and vantage point.  While it was easier and more satisfying for
many people to believe in simplistic formulations of good guys vs. bad
guys, or aggressor vs. victims, this was also very dangerous because it
only fed the fear, hatred, and separation that kept the conflict going.

While I might not necessarily emphasize all the same things Joel does or
draw all the same conclusions, I think he's done a real service to shed
light on things that are not easy to talk about.  I especially appreciate
his insistence that we should not favor one side over the other but rather
help people on all sides.  That's what CRC tried to do, and it wasn't easy!

My only real objection to his piece is the inclusion of some things that
seem too highly personal (e.g. being diagnosed with major depression).

His piece is definitely not a propaganda piece.  I recommend that it be posted.

Gary

On Fri, 9 Apr 1999, Joel GAzis-SAx  posted the following
account of conflict in the Balkans:

Dear John:

Thank you for your publication of the 'IGC top-ten censored stories'.  To
the item about Bosnia, I say it is about time that we looked critically at
manipulations of the truth which were prevalent from 1991 to 1995.

As I mentioned in an earlier statement which I sent to you, I was in former
Yugoslavia in 1992.  The week the TIME Magazine cover came out, I was in
Serbia.  I arrived in Hungary to see this on the newstand.  I immediately
called my wife and assured her that the Serbs had not been picking my
toenails out.

During the time I was in Serbia, I met with local peace activists and
representatives of the Yugoslav national government.  I knowingly broke the
law (I tell friends sometimes that I am an unconvicted felon because of my
violation of the embargo) so that I might find out what was happening in
Serbia.  I did not go as a patsy and I continue to object to many actions
taken by the Milosevic government, especially the ethnic cleansing of
Kosovo.  While I was there, I publically confronted members of Milosevic's
party about their continuing support of violent opposition in Bosnia.  I
advocated the cause of Serbian war resisters, not because I opposed the
Serbian government, but because I support all cases of war resistance.  And
I made that plain.

I admit many failings.  Sometimes I promised to deliver more than I could.
I failed to learn the language as well as I could.  And in 1994, I dropped
out completely with little explanation -- except to some very close friends
in the movement -- of my reasons.

They are:

1.)  I was diagnosed with major depression.  Bay area activists who worked
with me supported my decision and carried on the relief work which I had
urged others to begin.  (I do not take credit for anything other than part
of the inspiration for these fine programs.  I am sure that without me,
these people of conscience would have acted anyways.)  My close friends
knew I had to take care of myself.  This was the most important reason for
my retirement.  But it was aggravated by other factors.  These comprise my
critique of the peace movement's response to the ongoing Balkan crisis.

2.)  From 1992 to 1993, I was pnbalkans.  I felt pressured by people with
IGC and within the peace movement to take stands contrary to my avowed
pacifism.  I did not do so, but I felt emotionally weakened by their lack
of support for some basic principles of respect for human rights, in
particular:

* Support for Bosnian Muslim conscientious objectors.  While I was in
Croatia, the Croatian government undertook a program to return Bosnian male
refugees to Bosnia for service in the army.  Many of these men did not wish
to fight.  Their wishes were ignored.  Members of the PeaceNet staff told
me that they felt that the action was defensible.

* Integrity of information.  The same public relations people who
manufactured the incubator baby story also served the Bosnian government.
PeaceNet, I felt, did little to protect voices for neutral reporting.

* Firm rejection of the absolutist, anti-Serbian line.    The hypocrisy
shown by many activists, at PeaceNet as well as elsewhere at the time, is
well summed up by the remark one Serbian activist made in my presence.  He
said "We have been struggling with our government to end the killing of
Croats and Bosnians.  You respond by telling us and the whole world that
the solution is to kill us.  Whatever happened to peace?" I say "Exactly."

* Fair and impartial addressing of human rights violations.  The movement
failed to adequately address other human rights violations committed by the
Bosnian and Croatian government, particularly the position of Serbs, the
destruction of Serbian property, the denial of rights of conscientious
objectors, repression of the opposition press, and acts by the Croatian
government to ethnically cleanse itself of native-born Muslims.

Members of the PeaceNet staff undercut me as I weakly attempted to apply
these principles.  (Let me now thank George Gundry for his support.)  I
will acknowledge that at that time, I was feeling depressed.  It does not
erase the fact, however, that voices within PeaceNet tried to play to a
popular audience of feminists and anti- Serb opposition who wanted military
intervention against the Serbs. [For my position on the rape issue, please
see #4 below.]

3.)  The tendency to reject out of hand any Serbian claims of human rights
violations or atrocity or manipulation of the media by Balkan activists.

I know for a fact that in Croatia, Serbian homes were dynamited, either by
local zealots or the military.  The explosions were often explained by the
government radio as Serbian shellings.  The leading opposition magazine in
Croatia was suppressed by the Government, which held a monopoly on newstands.

Coupled with this was the ridiculing of Serbian voices for change,
particularly by Zagreb-based activists.

4.)  The most serious accusation being made in the early 1990s was, as you
may recall, that of rape as part of the ethnic cleansing campaign.  First,
I do not doubt that rape was being carried out in a systematic matter by
Serbian partisans in Bosnia.  And I do not doubt that Croatian and Bosnian
soliders also engaged in the rape of Serbian women.  Some of my fellow
activists too easily dismissed the claims of Serbian women. I say shame,
shame on them.  As a pacifist, I am on the side of all victims of war.

Second, many activists bought the hyperbole manufactured by the Croatian
and Bosnian war propaganda machines, stating erroneously that rape was a
new war crime.  It was not.  I have found it being used in several past
wars.  The Yugoslav conflict has finally awakened us to the fact that rape
is a war crime, a crime against humanity that deserves our attention. But
we must also recognize that it has been used by Balkan governments to
promote war, the injury of human beings.  Without public outcry, many of
the witnesses who came forth to testify to rape would have been merely
returned to refugee camps, their use by the Croatian and Bosnian
governments at an end. Some Croatian activists did speak up against this
misuse of victims in 1993.  I thank George Gundry, again, for helping bring
that statement to the attention of the peace movement.

5.)  The failure of most Balkan activists to visit Serbia.  The Serbian
Government, I will note, has been dogmatic, obstructionist, and repressive
towards Croats, Muslims, Magyars, and Serbs who have dared to confront it.
In 1992, however, I noted that there were voices of opposition in Serbia,
in contrast to the fear of their governments evinced by many Croatian
activists.  I saw them for myself.

6.)  I was confronted by many Balkan activists who outright denied the
existence of a Serbian peace movement!   These tended to be informal
operatives of the Bosnian and Croatian government.  Opposition viewpoints
were often not given time for rebuttal or for presentation of their side.
These would often mark any Serbian claims as "suspect" while accepting
Croatian and Bosnian accounts uncritically!

7.)  Many forums served only to showcase bitter dissention and to put
members of the Balkan community on the spot. People came to watch the
Serbian, Croat, and Bosnian participants "fight"; they left with little
hope of a solution other than military intervention.  Later experience led
me to suspect organizers of these affairs to be in complete, uncritical
sympathy with the Croatian and Bosnian governments.

8.)  Shortly after my return from former Yugoslavia, members of the local
Croat community, who knew a surprising amount about my work in former
Yugoslavia, met with me and tried to convince me that I had been
brainwashed.  In particular, they marked activists in the city of Osijek,
Croatia as being "liars".  To what degree, I ask, were members of the
Croatian peace movement responsible for this contact?  How did they know
things about me that I did not publish on the Net?

9.)  Centralization of the electronic peace process in Zagreb.  A key
listserver, Zamir-L, is located in Croatia.  The European- based activists
who set up this situation have failed to appreciate that Croatia is not
neutral ground.  This, as many conflict resolution and negotiation experts
will point out, is psychologically important.  (At this point, neither is
most of Western Europe or the United States or Russia.)

10.)  Members of the peace movement failed to speak to the fact that the
disputed cities of Sarajevo and Mostar had been, before the war, the site
of the final assembly lines for the Yugoslav arms business.  Serbs, Croats,
and Muslims, it could be argued, were fighting for control of an economic
future based on the export of human suffering. This fact, interestingly
enough, was well-covered in the anti-peace, arms trade press.  This, I
feel, has been insufficiently investigated by the peace movement.

11.)  Activists too often bought into the media depiction of the conflict
as something which "has been going on for six hundred years." I feel that
this is a form of racial hatred.  The present residents of former
Yugoslavia, be they Serb or Croat or Muslim or Kosovar or Maynar or
Makedonian are not responsible for the acts of their ancestors.  Nor do
these acts allow any of them an excuse for inaction or for war.  The people
responsible for what is happening now in Yugoslavia are the people who are
alive today, who have in their lifetimes developed views which lead to them
to violent conflict involving injury, dislocation, rape, and the taking of
the lives of others.  We have given the Yugoslavs a worthless gift when we
attempt to "historically appraise" the situation, the gift of hopelessness.
 The peace movement must seek out the seeds of hope and bring about
everyone's full awareness of the present.

12.)  The worst mistake made by activists has been the uncritical belief in
the cause of nationalist movements. Too many have failed to investigate
stories which have appeared in the press and rejected outright any claims
of atrocity by Croats, Muslims, and Kosovars.  We have also, too often,
accepted claims of atrocity against the Serbs ane even United Nations
peacekeepers without further investigation.  It is a shoddy Peace indeed
which is based on passions reached without crosschecks and further
investigation. It is our job to reach out to all the victims of war,
whether they be subjected to death by ethnic cleansing or bombing.

I think many things contributed to this state of affairs including the
overworking of Balkan activists who faced the problem of assisting
refugees, the overworking of Western activists who were handling too many
wars at the same time on too little money, and the astute manipulation of
the mediathe peace movement, and the women's movement by public relations
agents in the employ of Balkan governments.  These red flags were evident
to me in 1992 and I did speak up to them.

I have never stood with any of the governments of former Yugoslavia, except
that of Makedonia which broke with Yugoslavia when the Yugoslav dream of
ethnic harmony was destroyed by the Serbs, the Slovenes, the Croats, the
Bosnians, and, perhaps, some outside powers such as Europa and the United
States.  (More than any other government, the Makedonia has sought to make
peace with its neighbors and protect the rights and dignity of all its
ethnic groups.)  I stand and remain now on the side of the civilians, the
people of all nationalities who have been made to suffer because of the
hubris of nationalist politicians.  During my 1992 travels, I often met
with common people in war zones who blamed the conflict not only on the
"madman in Beograd", but also the madmen in Zagreb and Sarajevo.

I applaud that IGC is now willing to question the stories that were
circulated in 1992.  I was told in 1993 that this particular cover story
might have been manufactured.  I did not feel that I had the support then
to call for an investigation.  The climate inside IGC and the associated
networks at the time was decidedly pro-Croat and pro-Bosnian. (One IGC/APC
employee informed me that I was "outvoted" in my calls against military
intervention.)  Now that the Kosovo conflict has yielded an American
intervention, I applaud signs of change.

In October, 1992 I wrote:

"Many Croat sympathizers and the world press want inhuman Serbs.  The
noblest and most dangerous response to this war that any peace activist --
be he or she pacifist or anti-militarist by inclination -- can make is to
challenge this myth.  This is not to deny Serbian attacks on Vukovar and
Sarajevo:  rather it is to reject simplifications and to affirm the
complexity of the situation.  It is to insist on peaceful solutions instead
of military ones.  Zagreb has been a place of pilgrimage for the Western
peace movement.  Beograd sees nearly no one.  Our vision cannot help but be
distorted by one-sided "peace tours".  As Americans, as Europeans, as
Asians or Africans we must have the courage to visit Serbia, to engage her
people, to challenge her politicians -- both the good and the bad -- to
support those  laboring for reconciliation, and to do all that we can to
seek a peace that will come through means other than genocide."

I hope and pray that we might renew this struggle, on behalf on true peace
for everyone in the Balkans, Serb, Croat, Muslim, Slovene, Makedonian, and
Kosovar alike.

> According to the Institute for Global Communications (IGC), these are among
> the top twenty-five "under-reported" (censored) news stories of 1998.  You
> can add to these various other stories that CERJ has reported, including
> the massive US-funded military escalation of repressive activities in
> Colombia, and the narrow defeat in the US Congress of legislation that
> would have had the effect of forcing all of the US States to try children
> accused of crimes as adults in criminal courts. -- John Wilmerding, CERJ
>
> ACCORDING TO IGC, THE TOP 10 CENSORED OR UNDER-REPORTED JUSTICE-RELATED
> STORIES OF 1998 ARE:

> 7. U. S. MEDIA PROMOTES BIASED COVERAGE ON BOSNIA -- Sources: CAQ
> "Misinformation: TV Coverage of a Bosnian Camp", Fall 1998, No. 65 by
> Thomas Deichmann, and CAQ "Seeing Yugoslavia Through A Dark Glass", Fall
> 1998, No. 65 by Diana Johnstone.  A visit to the camps of Omarska and
> Trnopolje by a British team from Independent Television (ITN) on August 5,
> 1992 gave rise to the image of the Serbs as the new Nazis of the Balkans.
> A widely published photo taken by ITN pictured an emaciated Muslin behind
> barbed wire with comrades imprisoned behind him.  ITN's photo was not,
> however, as accurate as it seemed.  The men in the photo were not standing
> behind barbed wire.  In fact the Hague Tribunal confirmed that there was no
> barbed wire surrounding the Belesn 92 at Trnopolje.  The emaciated Muslim
> shown with his shirt off was in fact a very ill man selected to be featured
> in the photo.  Trnopolje was not a concentration camp, it was a refugee and
> transit center.  Many Muslims traveled there for protection and could leave
> whenever they wished.

Joel GAzis-SAx http://www.alsirat.com http://www.notfrisco.com

Politics are usually the executive expression of human immaturity. -- Vera
Brittain

--
To subscribe to the CERJ E-Mail distribution list, simply send
an E-mail message to . Please include your name
and your state, province, or country of residence.  Thank you!
--------------------------------------------------------------
John Wilmerding, Gen'l Secretary |  E-Mail:    
=================================|  Web:   http://www.cerj.org
*CERJ* International Secretariat |  ICQ:    "CERJ" at 18723495
---------------------------------+============================
Campaign     |  217 High Street  |   For        |      A
for          |  Brattleboro, VT  |   Justice    |      AR
Equity-      |  05301-3018  USA  |   that       |      ART
Restorative  |  Telephone & FAX  |   Restores   |     EAR
Justice      |  [802]  254-2826  |   Equity     |    HEAR
=================================================    HEART
Work together to reinvent justice using methods |     EARTH
that are fair; which conserve, restore and even |    HEARTH
create harmony, equity and good will in society | >>>|CERJ|<<<
==============================================================
We are the prisoners of the prisoners we have taken - J. Clegg
You must *be* the change you wish to see in the world - Gandhi



-> Send "subscribe   snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
->  Posted by: Franklin Wayne Poley